• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Mis‑Metering, Suspected Leak, Unnecessary Pipe Replacement

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Mis‑Metering, Suspected Leak, Unnecessary Pipe Replacement

    I recently switched from an unmetered (rateable value) supply to a metered supply with Severn Trent. Three months later, I received a very high bill, so I followed their leak‑diagnosis steps.



    1. Initial Leak Diagnosis

    - My external meter (in the pavement) showed high usage and the leak indicator was spinning.

    - I isolated my internal stop tap, but the meter still advanced.

    - Severn Trent’s billing team told me this indicated a leak on my private supply pipe.

    - Based on this, I contacted a Severn Trent–approved WIAPS plumber.



    2. Plumber’s Assessment

    - Plumber attended and said he could hear a “small leak” on my old lead supply pipe.

    - He recommended a full replacement of the 23m supply line.

    - I agreed, assuming the diagnosis was correct.



    3. Pipe Replacement & Discovery of a Shared Supply

    - The plumber replaced the entire supply line.

    - As they were backfilling, a neighbour a few doors down reported their water had gone off.

    - It turned out the supply was shared between several houses.

    - My old lead pipe was not leaking.

    - The plumber had to dig again, reconnect the shared supply, and cap off my old pipe.



    4. The Real Problem Identified

    - The reason the leak indicator was spinning was because Severn Trent had installed my meter on a shared supply, even though the other houses all have internal meters.

    - So my meter was measuring everyone’s usage, not just mine.

    - This made it look like I had a leak when I didn’t.



    5. Severn Trent’s Response So Far

    - Over the phone, Severn Trent have already admitted the meter appears to be incorrectly fitted.

    - An engineer is visiting to formally confirm this.

    - They have temporarily reduced my direct debit.

    - They have said I can apply for a free lead‑replacement connection (which would put me on my own supply).



    6. Current Situation

    - I now have a brand‑new 32mm MDPE supply pipe that I didn’t actually need.

    - The plumber has issued the invoice and needs to return to expose the connection again so Severn Trent can connect the new line.

    - I’m unsure who is liable for the cost:

    - Severn Trent (for mis‑metering and causing the false diagnosis)

    - The plumber (for not identifying the shared supply)

    - Or me (for acting on incorrect information)



    7. What I’m Trying to Decide

    - Should I pay the plumber in full?

    - Should I wait for Severn Trent’s formal findings?

    - Should I challenge the plumber for misdiagnosis?

    - Should I ask Severn Trent for compensation for unnecessary work?
    Tags: None

View our Terms and Conditions

LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
Working...
X