Is your "law team" a firm of solicitors?
Injury claim but who is liable??
Collapse
Loading...
X
-
Lawyer (solicitor) - retired from practice, now supervising solicitor in a university law clinic. I do not advise by private message.
Litigants in Person should download and read the Judiciary's handbook for litigants in person: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/..._in_Person.pdf
- 1 thank
-
Originally posted by atticus View PostIs your "law team" a firm of solicitors?
We provide legal services to members throughout Britain, working with selected specialist panel firm partners to provide local and specialist support for employment and personal injury claims where needed.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dslippy View PostYou have to question the apparent wisdom of a law firm proposing action on that basis.Last edited by swiss20001; 4th April 2023, 10:13:AM.
Comment
-
That sounds like a trade union, not a "law team". Perhaps you could ask them to refer you to one of their panel law firms.Lawyer (solicitor) - retired from practice, now supervising solicitor in a university law clinic. I do not advise by private message.
Litigants in Person should download and read the Judiciary's handbook for litigants in person: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/..._in_Person.pdf
- 1 thank
Comment
-
Originally posted by atticus View PostThat sounds like a trade union, not a "law team". Perhaps you could ask them to refer you to one of their panel law firms.
Comment
-
The links go to "UnionLine", claiming to be an SRA regulated law firmLawyer (solicitor) - retired from practice, now supervising solicitor in a university law clinic. I do not advise by private message.
Litigants in Person should download and read the Judiciary's handbook for litigants in person: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/..._in_Person.pdf
- 1 thank
Comment
-
Originally posted by swiss20001 View Post
As I've previously stated, I know very little about the law but this approach seems incredibly labour intensive and time consuming with the prospect of no end result. I know this is a free service for me, through my union, but I'm wondering if I'd get a more efficient service from a no win no fee solicitor? My point being a percentage of my compensation being better than no compensation at all.
Comment
-
The law firm is registered with the SRA as Trade Union Legal LLP known as UnionLine and from the website they provide legal advice to union members also working with a number of panel law firms.
My view is making claims against multiple parties seems a bit wasteful of resources and effort and it does seem a bit like they cannot work out who may potentially be responsible. My concern about that approach is that if they are unsure about who is responsible then potentially their arguments against any rebuttal that the other party is not responsible may not be as strong as if they were certain of who could be pursued for this claim. On the other hand, if there is a degree of uncertainty and the initial approach by UnionLine is forceful enough then one of the parties may agree it is their responsibility.
Sorry not to be more specific and it is only my view.
If you would like a one-to-one expert consultation with me on your employment issue than I can be contacted by emailing admin@legalbeaglesgroup.com
I do not provide advice by PM although I may on occasion ask you to send me documents this way but any related advice will be provided back on your thread.
I do my best to provide good practical advice, however I do so without liability.
If you have any doubts then do please seek professional legal advice.
You can’t always stop the waves but you can learn to surf.
You are braver than you believe, smarter than you think and stronger than you seem.
If we have helped you we'd appreciate it if you can leave a review on our Trust Pilot page
Comment
-
Originally posted by ULA View PostThe law firm is registered with the SRA as Trade Union Legal LLP known as UnionLine and from the website they provide legal advice to union members also working with a number of panel law firms.
My view is making claims against multiple parties seems a bit wasteful of resources and effort and it does seem a bit like they cannot work out who may potentially be responsible. My concern about that approach is that if they are unsure about who is responsible then potentially their arguments against any rebuttal that the other party is not responsible may not be as strong as if they were certain of who could be pursued for this claim. On the other hand, if there is a degree of uncertainty and the initial approach by UnionLine is forceful enough then one of the parties may agree it is their responsibility.
Sorry not to be more specific and it is only my view.
Comment
View our Terms and Conditions
LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.
If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.
If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Court Claim ?
Guides and LettersSHORTCUTS
Pre-Action Letters
First Steps
Check dates
Income/Expenditure
Acknowledge Claim
CCA Request
CPR 31.14 Request
Subject Access Request Letter
Example Defence
Set Aside Application
Witness Statements
Directions Questionnaire
Statute Barred Letter
Voluntary Termination: Letter Templates
A guide to voluntary termination: Your rights
Loading...
Loading...
Comment