• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Faulty used car purchased but from garage not local. SOGA Enquiry.

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Faulty used car purchased but from garage not local. SOGA Enquiry.

    Hi. I recently purchased a used car from a garage some 85 miles from my home address. Within a couple of weeks I noticed a knocking and some steering issues.


    It's a Volvo v70 d5 2005 with 220,000 on the clock.


    I had the car inspected by an independent garage and also tasked a main dealer specific to the vehicle to carry or a full check.


    They confirmed the following.
    NSF lower ball joint incorrectly fitted and stub axle damaged in process
    Failing lower gearbox engine mount (causing knocking)
    PAS fluid leaking severely from steering rack
    Air con condenser corroded and damaged.
    Brake fluid thick and black
    Left and right CV boot leaking.


    The mot does state play in steering rack inner joints but does not mention a massive leak it also states NSF suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated.


    Am on a losing streak as a result of what is mentioned on the mot or does the fact that they faults have been subject to professional scrutiny enable to me to make a claim against garage as they are blatantly a fault with the car. The main dealer stated that the NSF ball joint issue makes the car unsafe to drive and with he PAS leak, I have to keep topping up the PAS fluid once a week.


    I wrote to the garage under SOGA and received a fairly polite reply, he stated he was not there to "maintain my car". I have pointed out that I just want the car to be roadworthy and asks him at minimum to finance the repair costs for steering rack, the ball joint and the engine mount.


    He wrote back and said that under SOGA he is entitled to first inspect the car. However, he is miles away so do I have to travel to him or can he be compelled to attend to the car where it is. Especially as a main dealer has said it is unsafe to drive as a result of the ball joint and I have sent him close up photographs too.


    Can I push for costs based upon the evidence I already have and the safety issues surrounding these faults or am I going to have to drive the car all the way back to him.


    Am I able to be told who it is that will be inspecting the car if I end up taking it there.


    Your collective advice would be much appreciated.


    Ludlum
    Tags: None

  • #2
    Re: Faulty used car purchased but from garage not local. SOGA Enquiry.

    http://sogahub.tradingstandards.gov.uk/sogaataglance

    http://sogahub.tradingstandards.gov....ecklist-12-13/
    CAVEAT LECTOR

    This is only my opinion - "Opinions are made to be changed --or how is truth to be got at?" (Byron)

    You and I do not see things as they are. We see things as we are.
    Cohen, Herb


    There is danger when a man throws his tongue into high gear before he
    gets his brain a-going.
    Phelps, C. C.


    "They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance!"
    The last words of John Sedgwick

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Faulty used car purchased but from garage not local. SOGA Enquiry.

      The Supply of Goods & Services Act 1982 permits the consumer to recover consequential loss from the supplier of the goods or services. The garage is right in that it has to inspect the items highlighted. Just out of curiosity, did the car have a brand new MOT certificate when you purchased it?
      Life is a journey on which we all travel, sometimes together, but never alone.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Faulty used car purchased but from garage not local. SOGA Enquiry.

        Originally posted by bluebottle View Post
        The Supply of Goods & Services Act 1982 permits the consumer to recover consequential loss from the supplier of the goods or services. The garage is right in that it has to inspect the items highlighted. Just out of curiosity, did the car have a brand new MOT certificate when you purchased it?
        And, more to the point, who tested the jalopy or who had it tested?

        I'd suggest checking the MOT status (link), checking the MOT history (link) and perhaps contacting VOSA.(link).

        Comment

        View our Terms and Conditions

        LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

        If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


        If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
        Working...
        X