• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

**WON!!** Britpark PCN invalid?

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Britpark PCN invalid?

    You concur with their statement that they are not relying on POFA but query why they are trying to claim from the keeper when they should be contacting the driver, who was not the registered keeper.

    Foot, Shoot methinks.

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Britpark PCN invalid?

      I don't know enough about the law underpinning this/or their actions to say i concur, but if i did, then yes - you are right.
      what i can say with certainty is the BPA is explicit in what timeline should be followed (see my post of app E above) - "You must deliver letter to keeper with 14 DAYS after the issue event occured" - their emphasis in bold, my own underlined. My understanding is that the relevant legislation is equally explicit, so now don't know whether Britpark are "gaming the rules" or ....

      So, question is - anything to add to the POPLA appeal based on viewing their case file, or just sit it out and wait now?

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: Britpark PCN invalid?

        You have 2 options.

        1. Do nothing and win.

        2. Respond to the evidence and point out the rather alarming stupidity of the letter, and win.

        If you were able to bet on the result it would look like the match was fixed so you'd win !

        M1

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: Britpark PCN invalid?

          Hmmmm tricky
          "Although scalar fields are Lorentz scalars, they may transform nontrivially under other symmetries, such as flavour or isospin. For example, the pion is invariant under the restricted Lorentz group, but is an isospin triplet (meaning it transforms like a three component vector under the SU(2) isospin symmetry). Furthermore, it picks up a negative phase under parity inversion, so it transforms nontrivially under the full Lorentz group; such particles are called pseudoscalar rather than scalar. Most mesons are pseudoscalar particles." (finally explained to a captivated Celestine by Professor Brian Cox on Wednesday 27th June 2012 )

          I am proud to have co-founded LegalBeagles in 2007

          If we have helped you we'd appreciate it if you can leave a review on our Trust Pilot page

          If you wish to book an appointment with me to discuss your credit agreement, please email kate@legalbeaglesgroup. com

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: Britpark PCN invalid?

            Originally posted by Celestine View Post
            Hmmmm tricky
            They'd have been better conceding and saving £27.

            M1

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: Britpark PCN invalid?

              ok - I'm currently considering my best route to victory :-), but as a person who puts great value on doing the least possible....

              many thanks.

              p.s. is £27 their cost of using POPLA (win or lose)?

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: Britpark PCN invalid?

                Correct.

                M1

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: Britpark PCN invalid?

                  Originally posted by UncleMax View Post
                  what i can say with certainty is the BPA is explicit in what timeline should be followed (see my post of app E above) - "You must deliver letter to keeper with 14 DAYS after the issue event occured"
                  The 14 days is a requirement of POFA, nothing to do with the BPA, that they must adhere to to hold the keeper liable. They haven't followed the requirements of POFA, they have stated they are not following POFA therefore they cannot hold the keeper liable.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: Britpark PCN invalid?

                    Originally posted by ostell View Post
                    The 14 days is a requirement of POFA, nothing to do with the BPA, that they must adhere to to hold the keeper liable. They haven't followed the requirements of POFA, they have stated they are not following POFA therefore they cannot hold the keeper liable.
                    Indeed however it is in the COP at 21.7

                    Not making use of Keeper Liability provisions
                    21.6 To give drivers early notice of your claim, you should
                    apply to the DVLA for the keeper details promptly.
                    Usually this would be applying to the DVLA no more
                    than 28 days after the unauthorised parking event.
                    21.7 You must post the parking charge notice to the keeper
                    as soon as possible. Your target is to send the parking
                    charge notice to the keeper of the vehicle no more than
                    14 days after receiving the keeper data from the DVLA.
                    21.8 Your letter to the keeper should point out the details of
                    the unauthorised parking event and ask for payment or
                    request details of the driver. If you are not making use
                    of the keeper liability provisions of POFA or you are
                    unable to achieve the deadlines specified therein, your
                    letter must not reference POFA or state that the keeper
                    is liable.

                    M1

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: Britpark PCN invalid?

                      Ok. one observation - in their statement, they make no reference to when the keeper data was received from DVLA. this could be relevant, or not + depends how they define "target".
                      p.s. will def. wait for POPLA appeal before considering any sort of celebration....

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Re: Britpark PCN invalid?

                        Originally posted by UncleMax View Post
                        Ok. one observation - in their statement, they make no reference to when the keeper data was received from DVLA. this could be relevant, or not + depends how they define "target".
                        p.s. will def. wait for POPLA appeal before considering any sort of celebration....
                        Don't worry about any conversation about x,y or z you have won, it's just not official yet.

                        M1

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Re: Britpark PCN invalid?

                          A bit of a wait from POPLA - but we won! Time for a Guinness i reckon!! #stpatricksday

                          Now debating whether to refer this decision to the BPA - i reckon it could be anything up to a level 5 sanction for BritPark
                          http://www.britishparking.co.uk/writ..._Sanctions.pdf

                          Thank you all for your help on this - much appreciated.
                          Attached Files

                          Comment

                          View our Terms and Conditions

                          LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                          If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                          If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
                          Working...
                          X