Parking Control Management/Gladstones Court Claim

[TikiJnr]

Re: Parking Control Management/Gladstones Court Claim

And do I state again I was not the driver or swerve that altogether and just put my vehicle was parked

[mystery1]

Re: Parking Control Management/Gladstones Court Claim

Yeah, the more obvious it is the better. Makes a better case for unreasonable behaviour when it comes to costs.

M1

[TikiJnr]

Re: Parking Control Management/Gladstones Court Claim

Okay I'll crack on with it now and upload is asap. I really thought I was waiting to respond to something. Gutted =(

[TikiJnr]

Re: Parking Control Management/Gladstones Court Claim

Where they've put the defence and then current debt, do I use those headings? If so what do I put? Or do I turn the defence to the POC?

[TikiJnr]

Re: Parking Control Management/Gladstones Court Claim

And can I refer to their witness statement at all or is that not allowed? Like I have to almost ignore that I've seen it whilst doing my own. Thanks for this

[mystery1]

Re: Parking Control Management/Gladstones Court Claim

Nothing between number 2 and the statement of truth. You replace that with your own witness evidence.

So start with (tidy up the language etc this is just a rough idea)

I got a court claim.

I sent a letter/email. Exhibit 1639875234807236

They replied. exhibit 1639875234807237

I phoned them. Exhibit 1639875234807238

blah blah blah

Now in reality that's really all we need for the pleaded case. However you may wish to include things about the circumstances of the parking, which as non driver you would likely not know about (so none), getting a notice through the post, I WASN'T THE DRIVER, etc. I went to the site and pictured the signs etc etc (only the truth ) No legal argument etc

You can refer to their witness statement and rebut anything. So for example, they said your car was black but it's white. " In the witness statement of Bullshitter 1 they state i own a Black car, i actually own a white car. Exhibit 1639875234807239 (your v5)

M1

[TikiJnr]

Re: Parking Control Management/Gladstones Court Claim

So I don't need to comment on the POC or respond to any BS in their statement? So I've done the facts and the agreement is that it? If so then I'm done.

[mystery1]

Re: Parking Control Management/Gladstones Court Claim

No because the exhibits are clear and your witness statement is evidence. Your oral or written argument will attack their evidence and CPR failures. Although the bs you can where appropriate.

M1

[TikiJnr]

Re: Parking Control Management/Gladstones Court Claim

Sorry we crossed posts on that last one. I'm going to have a little attack on their witness statement. I think my evidence is really strong without their BS POC. I'll attempt to post it up myself once it's done. Don't hold your breath with my computer ability though!

[TikiJnr]

Re: Parking Control Management/Gladstones Court Claim

The signage map included in their witness statement, can I put it is not relevant as it is not placed on site to show which bays are which? Or is that upto the judge to decide?

[mystery1]

Re: Parking Control Management/Gladstones Court Claim

How do you mean ?

M1

[TikiJnr]

Re: Parking Control Management/Gladstones Court Claim

They've included like a little computer drawn map in their witness statement showing which bays they patrol. Which is all well and good but on site there are sainsbury ones everywhere including at the entrance and directly in front of where the car was parked. So this signage map doesn't help you on site to distinguish that these bays are not sainsbury bays.

[mystery1]

Re: Parking Control Management/Gladstones Court Claim

Kind of. Ignore the map but put in that there are multiple operators on the same, or apparently the same, site and how you discovered it so that in your legal argument (do be done later) you can have evidence to back up your attack on the plan. If you see what i mean.

M1

[TikiJnr]

Re: Parking Control Management/Gladstones Court Claim

I've stated multiple operators but don't understand the rest of what you mean. Shall I post up what I've done because I think I might be talking crap now =/ not sure what the legal argument bit is =/

[mystery1]

Re: Parking Control Management/Gladstones Court Claim

Prior to court (written argument) or on the day (oral argument) you present your case. This in theory, ties your defence and evidence together.

For example,

The case was you were in a car park and contracted to park and were due £100 because you farted.

Your defence is you weren't there so you owe nothing.

Your witness statement says you were on holiday in Africa at the time it couldn't be you. Your exhibit is your ticket, travel itinerary.

Your legal argument is i wasn't there here's my proof as per Beavis, no contract no penalty, tell them to go forth and multiply.

Basically.

M1