Parking Eye PCN - Wansbeck General Hospital

[bluebottle]

Re: Parking Eye PCN - Wansbeck General Hospital

Photos of a vehicle entering and leaving a car park do not constitute evidence of a parking infringement. A PPC would have to produce photographic evidence of a vehicle actually parked in the car park. The problem with digital photos is the ease with which they can be manipulated and time codings burned onto the shots changed, which happened in one case, some years ago, and which resulted in an employee of a private company acting for a local authority being jailed for Perverting the Course of Justice.

I would ask Parking Eye for photographic evidence of your car, actually parked in the car park. If they can't or won't, I would treat their claims and demands as suspect.

[labman]

Re: Parking Eye PCN - Wansbeck General Hospital

There's little point BB. It's easier to just get the POPLA code, appeal to them and win. Anything done directly with Parking Eye will just be rejected. :beagle:

[Van Horne]

Re: Parking Eye PCN - Wansbeck General Hospital

OK, so yesterday I sent off an email to Parking Eye, as suggested above, and this morning I received a reply telling me that "as a gesture of goodwill" they're cancelling the charge! They didn't give a reason, but basically said that if I use the car park again, to make sure I read the signs, which is fair enough.

Just want to say a big thanks to everyone who has replied and offered advice. I said it would be appreciated, and it is. Keep up the good work guys! :thumb:

[labman]

Re: Parking Eye PCN - Wansbeck General Hospital

Good result - well done!