• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Parking Eye

Collapse
Loading...
This thread is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Justinian
    replied
    Re: Parking Eye

    I managed to find their business address: it's

    Parking Eye
    40 Eaton Avenue, Buckshaw Village
    Chorley
    Lancashire
    PR7 7NA

    01772885800

    I suggest recipients of their (fake) PCNs and (illegal) threats contact Parking Eye and say that they intend to visit PE to discuss their (illegal) activities.

    Anyone that takes up this suggestion: please post your findings..

    Leave a comment:


  • wales01man
    replied
    Re: Parking Eye

    I agree with Bluebottle but must say there was supposed to be proper regulation problem came when you look into it the regulators came from the same banks,companies as those they regulated before they became regulators and after that they went back to same all corrupt remember dont S--t on your own door step?
    AS always money rules the LIBOR crooks did it for one reason Money and the top bank bosses took the bonuses from profits created by fraud
    Last edited by wales01man; 5th July 2012, 06:46:AM. Reason: spelling

    Leave a comment:


  • bluebottle
    replied
    Re: Parking Eye

    No. It's a hangover from the free-for-all get-rich-quick mentality of the 1980s and the failure of the Thatcher, Major, Blair and Brown governments to effectively regulate. Instead, they deregulated. Now you know why we're in the financial mess we're all in. Lack of proper and effective regulation.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nikolai
    replied
    Re: Parking Eye

    The world has gone mad. Whatever happened to treating other people reasonably and fairly - as you would expect to be treated yourself? It seems the policy now is do unto others before they do unto you. Disgraceful!

    Leave a comment:


  • bluebottle
    replied
    Re: Parking Eye

    Civil penalties that are not permitted by legislation - PCNs issued by local authorities excepted - are not enforceable, despite what Private Parking Companies (PPCs) claim. They tend to be very creative in what they say to obtain money from unwary motorists. If a PPC operates a Pay & Display car park, the only charges they can legitimately recover from an errant motorist is the parking fee for any period of time a motorist has overstayed. Consumer Protection Law does not allow penalties to be imposed in a consumer contract, as a number of PPCs have found to their cost.

    Leave a comment:


  • bluebottle
    replied
    Re: Parking Eye

    Morrisons use a number of PPCs including Parking Eye and Town & City Parking. One T&CP employee in a branch near to where I live told me the firm had told them to tell motorists the car park was owned by the local authority. I contacted the local authority and, surprise, surprise, the car park wasn't owned by the local authority. One day, when the police were called to intervene in a potential Breach of the Peace involving a T&CP employee and an irate motorist, yours truly butted in and let the police officers know exactly who owned the car park. They had some very strong words with said T&CP employee about what they had said to the motorist.

    As Labman, Clever Clogs and other posters have said, PCNs issued by PPCs are very difficult, if not, impossible to enforce. Cases have been reported on the LB forums and the media illustrating just how difficult it is to enforce what is, essentially, a speculative invoice. Parking Eye have had part of a claim disallowed by a County Court Judge which left them out of pocket to the tune of around £5,000, OPC and its directors were fined £30,000 by a Magistrates Court and Vehicle Control Services had a claim struck-out and had to pay costs to the motorist they tried to sue.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Re: Parking Eye

    It is an invoice basically saying if you don't pay they will take you through the county court. The chances of them doing this are very remote, and if they did, the chances of them winning are even more remote.

    Google it and you'll find loads. The advice of this site is to ignore everything, though you will read other opinions around the internet.

    Leave a comment:


  • wales01man
    replied
    Re: Parking Eye

    PLease people dont slag this firm off might get their solicitors to send a letter
    LOL LOL LOL LOL

    Leave a comment:


  • michael
    replied
    Re: Parking Eye

    Don't expect that your appeal will make the slightest difference - the threat-o-grams will keep rolling in. The main thing is to ignore them from now on and don't pay them a penny.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nightmare2
    replied
    Re: Parking Eye

    Sunderland Eye Infirmary 19/06/2012 - mid-afternoon - I took my daughter to the hospital, parked my car and then bought a parking ticket for £2.00 in respect of 1-2 hours parking after 47 minutes I left the parking area with my daughter and car.
    On the 27/06/2012 I recieved a Parking Charge Notice to Owner issued by ParkingEye for £40 (£60 if I didn't pay within the next 13 days) - I will write to them now and demand to see the parking machine payroll for the time period that I paid - I'm beginning to think that Parking Eye has reached a new all time low, I assume that this is just a speculative invoice?

    Anyone else had the same experience ?


    Noghtmare2
    Sunderland

    Leave a comment:


  • parkingwhat
    replied
    Re: Parking Eye

    just got 2 more letters same day final notice and saying about court debt collectors without actually saying it properly

    just shows to me i have already said in my last letter show me what proof i need or take me to court.......lol

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Re: Parking Eye

    Originally posted by Doggielinda View Post
    I too have suffered Parking charge notices from Parkingeye. I did send a written appeal to them but just received a standard letter from them on the day that my options of paying only £50 ran out.. All points I raised were of course ignored. I have now entered the £80 period (plus of course their £30 admin fee) Am I still entitled to ignore this charge notice. I am disabled and was not even aware that this Morrisons car park had changed their policies and any notification they had on display was not obvious. and so I sent a copy of my letter to the manager of the store in Bognor, West Sussex. I have not received a reply from them of course. I was in the carpark for less than an hour and had my disabled badge on display which entitles me to up to 3hours free parking.
    Firstly, this is not a fine and could only be enforced by suing you.

    Secondly, the best way to make this go away would probably be to tell the Chief Executive of Morrisons Stores about it - dalton.philips@morrisonsplc.co.uk


    Once acquainted with the facts - such as Parking Eye ignoring that you are a driver with disabilities - he may wish to give Parking Eye an appropriate ticking off, if not an even more appropriate kicking.

    Leave a comment:


  • ploddertom
    replied
    Re: Parking Eye

    Originally posted by Doggielinda View Post
    I too have suffered Parking charge notices from Parkingeye. I did send a written appeal to them but just received a standard letter from them on the day that my options of paying only £50 ran out.. All points I raised were of course ignored. I have now entered the £80 period (plus of course their £30 admin fee) Am I still entitled to ignore this charge notice. I am disabled and was not even aware that this Morrisons car park had changed their policies and any notification they had on display was not obvious. and so I sent a copy of my letter to the manager of the store in Bognor, West Sussex. I have not received a reply from them of course. I was in the carpark for less than an hour and had my disabled badge on display which entitles me to up to 3hours free parking.
    You may get further letters from them uttering all sorts of might be's, may be's etc, including from Debt Collectors & Solicitors. Have the courage & ignore them. Even if they do issue any proceedings there are those versed in defending in full and Parking Eye lose. All you have is a speculative invoice - it is not a fine.

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggielinda
    replied
    Re: Parking Eye

    I too have suffered Parking charge notices from Parkingeye. I did send a written appeal to them but just received a standard letter from them on the day that my options of paying only £50 ran out.. All points I raised were of course ignored. I have now entered the £80 period (plus of course their £30 admin fee) Am I still entitled to ignore this charge notice. I am disabled and was not even aware that this Morrisons car park had changed their policies and any notification they had on display was not obvious. and so I sent a copy of my letter to the manager of the store in Bognor, West Sussex. I have not received a reply from them of course. I was in the carpark for less than an hour and had my disabled badge on display which entitles me to up to 3hours free parking.

    Leave a comment:


  • funkyphantom
    replied
    Re: Parking Eye

    Woo hook got letter number 4 the other day!!

    Leave a comment:

View our Terms and Conditions

LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
Working...
X