Originally posted by labman
View Post
Parking Eye
Collapse
Loading...
This thread is closed.
X
X
-
Re: Parking Eye
I disagree, she has appealed and identified herself as the driver. It now has nothing to do with the RK (her employer)
-
Guest repliedRe: Parking Eye
I agree Michael. However, this is one of the very rare exceptions where only she can measure her employer's attitude towards this. Sometimes in this situation, sadly it is best to pay - better than jeopardising their job. If she has understanding employers, ignore and there will be no problem.Originally posted by 1048glen View PostOk, so i had a penalty charge from these people, and after reading this thread i am ignoring them, however my friends mumhas also recently had a letter, unfortunatly it was on her company car and her employers initially received the notice which they passed onto her. Not knowing what i know from reading various threads, she followed their appeals procedure, so i guess what i need to know now is what she should do? Has she already, by appealing admitted that she was the driver and therefore pay the charge?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Parking Eye
No, since it is a company car, under Protection of Freedom Act, they would have been able to chase the RK ie the company who may have paid up and charged her for it. Now she has told them who the driver is, they can only chase her..... and she can carry on ignoring.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Parking Eye
Ok, so i had a penalty charge from these people, and after reading this thread i am ignoring them, however my friends mumhas also recently had a letter, unfortunatly it was on her company car and her employers initially received the notice which they passed onto her. Not knowing what i know from reading various threads, she followed their appeals procedure, so i guess what i need to know now is what she should do? Has she already, by appealing admitted that she was the driver and therefore pay the charge?
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: Parking Eye
Yes, I know perfectly well, that's precisely why I have recommended so many people do not pay these fines over the years.Originally posted by The Debt Star View PostDown to 9, one's gone out to lunch early.
Lab, 60% pay up because of the official looking documentation of course. Which makes very good confetti in the shredder din't ya know.
- 1 thank
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: Parking Eye
Originally posted by ploddertom View Postps we are up to 14 guests at present
Down to 9, one's gone out to lunch early.
Lab, 60% pay up because of the official looking documentation of course. Which makes very good confetti in the shredder din't ya know.
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: Parking Eye
I agree PT, as it costs £27 a shot for every appeal upheld in their favour then which will be 99% of them. They will feel that in their fat wallets, though sadly the fact remains 60% pay up anyway. If only we could wave a wand and empower them (I hate that word! lol) over this issue.
- 1 thank
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Parking Eye
And how many times have we seen the situation where someone has been accused of staying for 8+ hours because they conveniently lost the pics in between.Originally posted by wales01man View PostOne couuld also ask if the car park had other cameras that could prove the aledged offender actuakky parked for a period of time ,surely they cannot claim a bean off someone who only drove in and out of a car park one or more times, i have often driven into retail car parks driven out without parking and returned later
I still advocate everyone should choose to go to POPLA before ignoring.
ps we are up to 14 guests at present
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: Parking Eye
Fook me, 10 Guests are back again!
Don't the staff at Parkign Eye have anything better to do? Like develop some photos of my R reg Ford Sierra leaving Starbucks in Dagenham last November? LOLLast edited by The Debt Star; 24th January 2013, 09:45:AM. Reason: Actually make that my 1982 C reg Sierra
Leave a comment:
-
Guest replied
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: Parking Eye
The alleged offender can ask to see stills (that's all they get) for which they are charged between £10-£25.Originally posted by wales01man View PostQuestion,If this parking company has photos of the car entering at a time and leaving after the so called allowed parking period could the alleged offender not ask to see the unedited CC TV footage to check that the car did not leave earlier and return earlier ?
One couuld also ask if the car park had other cameras that could prove the aledged offender actuakky parked for a period of time ,surely they cannot claim a bean off someone who only drove in and out of a car park one or more times, i have often driven into retail car parks driven out without parking and returned later
However, there's no point as it just gives some credence - much better to totally ignore.
And Hi to the guests! Welcome to LB! :-)
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: Parking Eye
Now there's a thought. If we all drove in and out of their carparks all day, every day in our hundreds and thousands their admin would go through the roofOriginally posted by wales01man View PostQuestion,If this parking company has photos of the car entering at a time and leaving after the so called allowed parking period could the alleged offender not ask to see the unedited CC TV footage to check that the car did not leave earlier and return earlier ?
One couuld also ask if the car park had other cameras that could prove the aledged offender actuakky parked for a period of time ,surely they cannot claim a bean off someone who only drove in and out of a car park one or more times, i have often driven into retail car parks driven out without parking and returned later
Hello 10 "Guests" BTW (Parking Eyes - PMSL)
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Parking Eye
Question,If this parking company has photos of the car entering at a time and leaving after the so called allowed parking period could the alleged offender not ask to see the unedited CC TV footage to check that the car did not leave earlier and return earlier ?
One couuld also ask if the car park had other cameras that could prove the aledged offender actuakky parked for a period of time ,surely they cannot claim a bean off someone who only drove in and out of a car park one or more times, i have often driven into retail car parks driven out without parking and returned later
- 1 thank
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Parking Eye
Mine is due to paid by tomorrow. Good luck Parking Eye I will NOT BE PAYING.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Parking Eye
God they are really annoying arent they. I already got a 'reminder' this weekend. Before the date of the 22nd of the reduced pay. Pests
Leave a comment:
View our Terms and Conditions
LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.
If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.
If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
Leave a comment: