Originally posted by atticus
View Post
Minster Baywatch PCN
Collapse
Loading...
X
-
Are you saying that the Notice to Keeper was not sent to the registered keeper of the vehicle, that is to say the person registered at DVLA as being the keeper?Lawyer (solicitor) - retired from practice, now supervising solicitor in a university law clinic. I do not advise by private message.
Litigants in Person should download and read the Judiciary's handbook for litigants in person: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/..._in_Person.pdf
Comment
-
Originally posted by atticus View PostAre you saying that the Notice to Keeper was not sent to the registered keeper of the vehicle, that is to say the person registered at DVLA as being the keeper?
The Company Secretary
My Partner's Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
Postcode
He's not the company secretary as he does not have a company.
Comment
-
So after all that it was sent to the keeper and not a company.Lawyer (solicitor) - retired from practice, now supervising solicitor in a university law clinic. I do not advise by private message.
Litigants in Person should download and read the Judiciary's handbook for litigants in person: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/..._in_Person.pdf
Comment
-
So it was sent to the correct person
The PCN does not state "a specified period of parking" but only the times the vehicle was recorded as entering and leaving the park.
You can use the following as a template:
I have just received your Notice to Keeper xxxxx for vehicle VRM xxxx
You have failed to comply with the requirements of Schedule 4 of The Protection Of Freedoms Act 2012 namely,
!)
2)
as prescribed by section 9 (4) of the Act. You cannot, therefore, transfer liability for the alleged charge from the driver at the time to me, the keeper.
There is no legal requirement to name the driver at the time and I will not be doing so.
Any further communication with me on this matter, apart from confirmation of no further action and my details being removed from your records, will be considered vexatious and harassment. This includes communication from any Debt Collection companies you care to instruct.
Yours etc
first class post with free certificate of posting from a post office
They will likely reject your appeal and you will then be able to take it to PoPLA.
Comment
-
Originally posted by des8 View PostSo it was sent to the correct person
The PCN does not state "a specified period of parking" but only the times the vehicle was recorded as entering and leaving the park.
You can use the following as a template:
I have just received your Notice to Keeper xxxxx for vehicle VRM xxxx
You have failed to comply with the requirements of Schedule 4 of The Protection Of Freedoms Act 2012 namely,
!)
2)
as prescribed by section 9 (4) of the Act. You cannot, therefore, transfer liability for the alleged charge from the driver at the time to me, the keeper.
There is no legal requirement to name the driver at the time and I will not be doing so.
Any further communication with me on this matter, apart from confirmation of no further action and my details being removed from your records, will be considered vexatious and harassment. This includes communication from any Debt Collection companies you care to instruct.
Yours etc
first class post with free certificate of posting from a post office
They will likely reject your appeal and you will then be able to take it to PoPLA.
Comment
-
Don't forget to fill in the gaps!Lawyer (solicitor) - retired from practice, now supervising solicitor in a university law clinic. I do not advise by private message.
Litigants in Person should download and read the Judiciary's handbook for litigants in person: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/..._in_Person.pdf
Comment
-
Originally posted by atticus View PostDon't forget to fill in the gaps!
On the subject of the address, my partner would have binned the letter believing it was junk mail. He discards anything that isn't addressed correctly, but his son was visiting due to ill health, and he opened it. What would happen if he did discard it?
Comment
-
Your husband would probably have received a reminder.
If that was ignored then either debt collector's letter or court papers (i think they instruct Gladstones to act on their behalf)
Of course if the appeals fail they might well proceed to court.
Comment
-
Originally posted by des8 View PostYour husband would probably have received a reminder.
If that was ignored then either debt collector's letter or court papers (i think they instruct Gladstones to act on their behalf)
Of course if the appeals fail they might well proceed to court.
My partner contacted the top person at the National Trust, and one of her mignons replied. They said to contact the Gloucestershire Wildlife Trust as the NT is only a partner at the site. He contacted GWT and received what amounted to a scripted response. I suggest the complaints on Trip Advisor have meant they get lots of e-mails regarding Minster Baywatch. They replied and said they do not intervene in parking disputes.
I have learned they only take the ticket fees, and any penalties go direct to Minster Baywatch. We have told both the NT and GWT we will not return to the site and will go out of our way to warn friends and family.
Thank you again
Comment
-
Hi,
I apologise for the lack of activity, we all caught Covid, and it hit my partner hard. He has not recovered correctly yet.
The reply from MB arrived on 19/10/22, and I have tried to post images suitably redacted.
They seem to have ignored the premise of the appeal; namely, they failed to comply with POFA 2012 as advised by des8 and say the vehicle contravened the terms and conditions of parking. They have quoted https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2015-0116.html
I am not legally trained, but I am unsure if POFA was involved. Beavis appears to be the driver, whereas we don't know who the driver was, and the failure to comply with POFA 2012 means the liability cannot be transferred to the keeper.
Comment
-
Originally posted by des8 View PostSo appeal to POPLA.
It is free to you (but not the parking company!)
If you don't agree with the POPLA outcome, you can let it go to court.
The company has to abide by the POPLA decision
Thank you again.
Comment
-
A good place to start is the Popla page: https://appealform.popla.co.uk/#/StartAppeal/Index
Do not identify the driver, and besides including the points already mentioned include anything else you can think of.
Your appeal basically is that their failure to comply exactly with the Schedule 4 of PoFA 2012 means they cannot pass liability on to the registered keeper
Good luck
Comment
View our Terms and Conditions
LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.
If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.
If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Court Claim ?
Guides and LettersSHORTCUTS
Pre-Action Letters
First Steps
Check dates
Income/Expenditure
Acknowledge Claim
CCA Request
CPR 31.14 Request
Subject Access Request Letter
Example Defence
Set Aside Application
Witness Statements
Directions Questionnaire
Statute Barred Letter
Voluntary Termination: Letter Templates
A guide to voluntary termination: Your rights
Loading...
Loading...
Comment