Loading...
-
CAVEAT LECTOR
This is only my opinion - "Opinions are made to be changed --or how is truth to be got at?" (Byron)
You and I do not see things as they are. We see things as we are.
Cohen, Herb
There is danger when a man throws his tongue into high gear before he
gets his brain a-going.
Phelps, C. C.
"They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance!"
The last words of John SedgwickTags: None -
Re: A CLAIMANT CAN SUE AN UNNAMED DRIVER - Court of Appeal - New case (May 2017)
From what ive read it seems a sensible decision.I work for Roach Pittis Solicitors. I give my free time available to helping other on the forum and would be happy to try and assist informally where needed. Any posts I make on LegalBeagles are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as legal advice. Any advice I provide is without liability.
If you need to contact me please email me on Pt@roachpittis.co.uk .
I have been involved in leading consumer credit and data protection cases including Harrison v Link Financial Limited (High Court), Grace v Blackhorse (Court of Appeal) and also Kotecha v Phoenix Recoveries (Court of Appeal) along with a number of other reported cases and often blog about all things consumer law orientated.
You can also follow my blog on consumer credit here. -
Re: A CLAIMANT CAN SUE AN UNNAMED DRIVER - Court of Appeal - New case (May 2017)
Good afternoon, PT.Originally posted by pt2537 View Post
Parking management companies often use spurious cases to hoodwink people into believing that 'one size fits all' (Beavis, Elliott v Loake etc.) in order to persue PCNs.
This could well be another one they'll try to use.CAVEAT LECTOR
This is only my opinion - "Opinions are made to be changed --or how is truth to be got at?" (Byron)
You and I do not see things as they are. We see things as we are.
Cohen, Herb
There is danger when a man throws his tongue into high gear before he
gets his brain a-going.
Phelps, C. C.
"They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance!"
The last words of John SedgwickComment
-
Re: A CLAIMANT CAN SUE AN UNNAMED DRIVER - Court of Appeal - New case (May 2017)
I do doubt it, this case is quite different to a private parking case. Its clearly distinguishable on its facts.I work for Roach Pittis Solicitors. I give my free time available to helping other on the forum and would be happy to try and assist informally where needed. Any posts I make on LegalBeagles are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as legal advice. Any advice I provide is without liability.
If you need to contact me please email me on Pt@roachpittis.co.uk .
I have been involved in leading consumer credit and data protection cases including Harrison v Link Financial Limited (High Court), Grace v Blackhorse (Court of Appeal) and also Kotecha v Phoenix Recoveries (Court of Appeal) along with a number of other reported cases and often blog about all things consumer law orientated.
You can also follow my blog on consumer credit here.Comment
-
Re: A CLAIMANT CAN SUE AN UNNAMED DRIVER - Court of Appeal - New case (May 2017)
Originally posted by pt2537 View Post
So is E v L.....doesn't stop them trying! (Chancers!)CAVEAT LECTOR
This is only my opinion - "Opinions are made to be changed --or how is truth to be got at?" (Byron)
You and I do not see things as they are. We see things as we are.
Cohen, Herb
There is danger when a man throws his tongue into high gear before he
gets his brain a-going.
Phelps, C. C.
"They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance!"
The last words of John SedgwickComment
Tweet
Comment