• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Incredible view of High Court judge in £75 Council Tax costs

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Amethyst
    replied
    Re: Incredible view of High Court judge in £75 Council Tax costs

    No I saw it was interesting, and a sound judgment (IMV) but wasn't sure what the 'incredible' bit was...and in what context ( good incredible or bad incredible etc ?) sorry was just asking.xx

    Leave a comment:


  • Crazy council
    replied
    Re: Incredible view of High Court judge in £75 Council Tax costs

    Hi

    , my interest is nealry all councils hid things in the charging figures , mine and outlawlgos council, hide mistakes and false accounts and charge the people that get LOs for the time/admin costs.

    I have 100 customers, I take LO action against 15 of them ( and it costs me ) , afterwards, i find that i should have really only taken action against 4. so

    I charge the 4 for all the time and costs it took me to correct the other 11. Even if the other 11 was entryly my fault

    This is how to hide figures from the externally audited SCR rate and manipluate the accuracy figures

    Leave a comment:


  • charitynjw
    replied
    Re: Incredible view of High Court judge in £75 Council Tax costs

    Apologies - I reread the case & my post was incorrect.

    I give up!

    c

    (Crossed posts with Crazy council, lol)

    Leave a comment:


  • Crazy council
    replied
    Re: Incredible view of High Court judge in £75 Council Tax costs

    Hi

    its interesting becaue of the questions the judge answers

    1. Question 1
      "Were we correct to find that the application for the liability order was valid when the summons included a request for costs?"


    1. Question 2
      "Were we correct in finding the Appellant liable on the basis of the evidence we heard and the certificate produced by the Council"


    1. Question 3
      "Were we right to conclude the costs reasonably incurred in this case amounted to £75"


    The answer to Question all is "Yes"

    and also, its quite helpfull for what am doing to have a judge make some form of judgement against the costs of LO, becuase that meens someone can check what he rules there, and mesure that against other coucils, Mine and @outlawlgo s council are terrible at these costs and just make them up

    Leave a comment:


  • Amethyst
    replied
    Re: Incredible view of High Court judge in £75 Council Tax costs

    Why 'incredible' outlawgo ?

    ( do you know what happened with costs btw ?)

    Leave a comment:

View our Terms and Conditions

LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
Working...
X