We have just had gate posts installed in our driveway in preparation for a gate. The neighbours have rather testily turned up and claimed the land that one of the posts is in belongs to them. This land is an approximate 12" wide x 10m long strip of soil at the base of the wall that separates our property from theirs. Not under any circumstances would you presume this land belonged to the other property. Given the narrowness of the strip, Land Registry plans are useless as although they currently show it as ours, once scaled up the dividing line itself is more than a metre wide so too wide for this strip to be clearly defined.
We have told the gate people to pause the construction of the gate while we resolve this. In theory, it is not impossible for us to move the post but it would leave a gap down the side through which the dog could escape, somewhat defeating the object of putting the gate in, as well as having an additional cost to re-siting the post. However, there is an obvious principle in play here. In essence, someone has just claimed that a bit of land, albeit small, belongs to them. They claim to have evidence of this but given that these are both 19th century buildings, I don't hold out a lot of hope for clarity to this level of precision. Also, presumably I would be able to deny access to this strip of land on the grounds that they would have to come onto my land to tend to it?
What I don't want to do is go down a legal route that will cost a sizeable sum and may still rule against us. But I also don't want someone to just claim some land of mine as theirs without recourse. Upon whom is the burden of proof?
We have told the gate people to pause the construction of the gate while we resolve this. In theory, it is not impossible for us to move the post but it would leave a gap down the side through which the dog could escape, somewhat defeating the object of putting the gate in, as well as having an additional cost to re-siting the post. However, there is an obvious principle in play here. In essence, someone has just claimed that a bit of land, albeit small, belongs to them. They claim to have evidence of this but given that these are both 19th century buildings, I don't hold out a lot of hope for clarity to this level of precision. Also, presumably I would be able to deny access to this strip of land on the grounds that they would have to come onto my land to tend to it?
What I don't want to do is go down a legal route that will cost a sizeable sum and may still rule against us. But I also don't want someone to just claim some land of mine as theirs without recourse. Upon whom is the burden of proof?
Comment