Private tenants can use human rights to prevent s21 (Pt 2)

[Guest]

Re: Private tenants can use human rights to prevent s21 (Pt 2)

Costs of civil litigation
Further to reading an interesting blog entry on civil litigation and costs today
When does tortuous behaviour become torture?
This is the link between civil litigation, and human rights.
If the authorities do not help, damages can be claimed under HRA 1998.

[Eloise01]

Re: Private tenants can use human rights to prevent s21 (Pt 2)

When does tortuous behaviour become torture?

Around about your thirteenth post...

[Guest]

Re: Private tenants can use human rights to prevent s21 (Pt 2)

Deleted.

[Guest]

Re: Private tenants can use human rights to prevent s21 (Pt 2)

Today I closed my legal aid claim.
The assistance was just making more work for me.
I should have the transcript within a week.

[Guest]

Re: Private tenants can use human rights to prevent s21 (Pt 2)

Human right to a fair and public trial, and paperwork
After being told some time ago by the current court that, quote:
"There is no way you will get a fair and public trial" - (per Human Rights Act 1998)
Today I asked the court on record if they would be giving me a fair and public trial, etc.
The answer, though recorded, was somewhat unclear, and will be needing further clarification.
I will be submitting a request re. length of hearing, and serving notice that I want to summons witnesses.
I went through the court documents and discovered I never received the original claim (N11B).
The court have been asked to send this to me, along with N5B.
I never copied and kept N5B as Shelter had told me there was "no defence" (except extension for hardship).

I discovered the CJ was missing the evidence, claim for costs and Question 3 of the Application Notice. Possibly others.
This is because the DJ handed them back to me at the end of the trial.
They will be sent to CJ imminently.

[Guest]

Re: Private tenants can use human rights to prevent s21 (Pt 2)

Grow Heathrow judgement
This will be ready at any time during the coming months due to the unavailability of a judge.

Government won't even let the homeless use abandoned commercial buildings!!!!!
Further comments from the Grow Heathrow website:
"Imran Malk’s legal team insisted in the Royal Courts of Justice on 15 January: “If the landowner wants to leave the land vacant, they’re entitled to.” Threats of eviction come amid a desperate government crackdown on squatting. 24 MPs signed a parliamentary petition in January that would criminalise Grow Heathrow. It threatens to criminalise all homeless people who are forced to live in empty abandoned commercial buildings amid housing and economic crises, by making it illegal to squat commercial buildings. Recent research found that 40% of all single homeless people have depended on squatting to have a roof over their head as they sleep"

If these comments are precise, this is a NATIONAL DISGRACE.
I refer not to the treatment of Grow Heathrow here, in focus, but the TREATMENT OF THE HOMELESS.
1 MILLION HOMELESS!!!
PLEASE SIGN MY PETITION: here

[Guest]

Re: Private tenants can use human rights to prevent s21 (Pt 2)

Legal advice
Today I heard from my previous legal advisor regarding my changing my mind about legal assistance.
I have communicated back with the party.
I am aware of the importance of this case.
The human rights violations have been covered in a far more extensive fashion than any case I am aware of.
Currently, all so-called 'mandatory possession proceedings' in this country are conducted unlawfully to my awareness.

My opinions
I am entitled to my opinions, and have a human right to express myself.
Ownership/whatever of Legal Beagles notwithstanding.

The very poor treatment of tenants and the homeless WILL END.
We each have a personal duty of care to them, and now is the time to act.

[Guest]

Re: Private tenants can use human rights to prevent s21 (Pt 2)

Upon further consideration of the treatment of the homeless
Protective Costs Order

I will now be requesting the judge to release full transcripts of both my hearings without delay.
These will be analysed to demonstrate the REPEATED HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS they contain.
I have already told the courts the case is in the public interests.
Now I may need to push for the protective costs order.
(I will need to find out exactly what the implications are.... )
(I have great faith in my friends here at Legal Beagles and PCO was applied for on one's advice).

Update: 30,000-50,000 affected: PCO awarded, CA.

[PlanB]

Re: Private tenants can use human rights to prevent s21 (Pt 2)

Government won't even let the homeless use abandoned commercial buildings!!!!!
Further comments from the Grow Heathrow website:
"Imran Malk’s legal team insisted in the Royal Courts of Justice on 15 January: “If the landowner wants to leave the land vacant, they’re entitled to.” Threats of eviction come amid a desperate government crackdown on squatting. 24 MPs signed a parliamentary petition in January that would criminalise Grow Heathrow. It threatens to criminalise all homeless people who are forced to live in empty abandoned commercial buildings amid housing and economic crises, by making it illegal to squat commercial buildings. Recent research found that 40% of all single homeless people have depended on squatting to have a roof over their head as they sleep"

If these comments are precise, this is a NATIONAL DISGRACE.
I refer not to the treatment of Grow Heathrow here, in focus, but the TREATMENT OF THE HOMELESS.
1 MILLION HOMELESS!!!
PLEASE SIGN MY PETITION: here

I've signed your petition because I feel passionately about the plight of the homeless and I wasn't aware of the intention to make squatting in commercial buildings a criminal offence. In 1974 I was one of the protestors who occupied Centre Point in London which was a symbol of greed when it had been left empty for years by a property speculator - and I would do it again tomorrow if I had to eace:

http://www.20thcenturylondon.org.uk/mol-hg2643-54

[UnitedFront]

Re: Private tenants can use human rights to prevent s21 (Pt 2)

Before I write this post, I must say categorically that I will not comment on anything regarding the main topic of the thread.

I will say, however, that I agree with you regarding squatting. I am dead set against making it an offence to squat commercial buildings.

I was also dead set against making it illegal to squat residential buildings. There were already laws in place that allowed the police to remove squatters from residential buildings, immediately and without a warrant, if there was a displaced occupier or intended occupier - as is so often the cases, unfortunately, the police didn't have a God damn clue what the law actually said. They therefore told everyone it was a civil matter only, even though there was jurisdiction for the police to act.

[PlanB]

Re: Private tenants can use human rights to prevent s21 (Pt 2)

I will say, however, that I agree with you regarding squatting. I am dead set against making it an offence to squat commercial buildings.

I was also dead set against making it illegal to squat residential buildings.

Leaving properties empty when so many people are homeless through no fault of their own is a disgrace so I hope this website which produces the Squatters Handbook helps anyone needing a roof over their head:

https://network23.org/ass/

NB Local Authorities are the worst offenders for sitting on empty property due to their utter incompetence :rant:

[PlanB]

Re: Private tenants can use human rights to prevent s21 (Pt 2)

Grow Heathrow judgement This will be ready at any time during the coming months due to the unavailability of a judge.

The Heathrow Squatters judgement hasn't happened yet :bored: but the COA has dismissed the Johnson & Ors v Old appeal where the tenant argued that rent paid in advance was in fact a "deposit" which should be placed in a Government backed scheme and failure to do this should prevent the Landlord using section 21 to end the tenancy.

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2013/415.html

I know CP would be interested to know this outcome even if it's bad news for tenants. She was looking for any relevance in this case for her own problem.

[justanother]

Re: Private tenants can use human rights to prevent s21 (Pt 2)

I know CP would be interested to know this outcome even if it's bad news for tenants. She was looking for any relevance in this case for her own problem.

OP's 2 month absence from the forums suggests she was either trolling the whole time or, more likely, has found herself on the wrong end of a High Court enforcement officer executing a possession order.

[FlamingParrot]

Re: Private tenants can use human rights to prevent s21 (Pt 2)

OP's 2 month absence from the forums suggests she was either trolling the whole time or, more likely, has found herself on the wrong end of a High Court enforcement officer executing a possession order.

Maybe, but that wouldn't stop her from reading these posts on her mobile phone, or finding a WiFi spot to connect with her tablet or laptop. :nerd: :nerd: :nerd:

[wales01man]

Re: Private tenants can use human rights to prevent s21 (Pt 2)

AS a clairvoyant she dont need to access the forum she sees all before her?