Can an order to sell still be made by a debtor if ownershiphas changed??
Collapse
Loading...
X
-
This person has sued you and obtained judgement. He has obtained a charging order.
If there is no equity in the property available to pay this person than you should collate evidence to show this.Lawyer (solicitor) - retired from practice, now supervising solicitor in a university law clinic. I do not advise by private message.
Guides and handbooks for Litigants in Person - :
https://legalbeagles.info/forums/for...60#post1701560
- 1 thank
Comment
-
Hi atticusOriginally posted by atticus View PostThis person has sued you and obtained judgement. He has obtained a charging order.
If there is no equity in the property available to pay this person than you should collate evidence to show this.
Thank you for your reply.
Today I have received the attached letter, as you will see, the person is informing me that he intends to apply to the court for sale of the land and he is suggesting three sales agents. Do I have to agree to a sales agent before it even goes to court? Isn't he being presumptuous in just assuming that he will be granted the order? As I have stated in previous posts, there is no equity in the property, as even if the court disregards the fact that the land is now owned by my Partner and puts it back to being in my name, the mortgage company would still have first call on any monies due from the sale and there would no money left after the mortgage company have been paid off.
Thank you for any help/advice that you can give me.
Attached Files
Comment
-
You are being offered a choice: (1) agree with their suggestions, or (2) court. Nothing presumptuous about that.
Have you collated evidence that there is no equity in the property to pay this person, as I previously advised?Lawyer (solicitor) - retired from practice, now supervising solicitor in a university law clinic. I do not advise by private message.
Guides and handbooks for Litigants in Person - :
https://legalbeagles.info/forums/for...60#post1701560
Comment
-
Hi atticus
Thank you for your reply, but I'm afraid that isn't how I read that letter? The letter states that he is now going to apply to the Court for sale of the land, he isn't giving me a choice to whether to agree to his suggestions or to go to Court, he is stating that he is applying to Court for the sale of the land, and suggesting prospective selling agents? As I understand it, it isn't a given that he will be granted the order for the land to be sold, so I feel he is being presumptuous in asking for my suggestions for selling agents?Originally posted by atticus View PostYou are being offered a choice: (1) agree with their suggestions, or (2) court. Nothing presumptuous about that.
Have you collated evidence that there is no equity in the property to pay this person, as I previously advised?
Yes, i have collated evidence that there is no equity in the property as you suggested, thank you.
Comment
-
Hi atticus
Today I have received Court Papers but they name my Partner as First Defendant when his name isn't even on the Court Order as he had no part in the procedures. Is this right?
Also, the Court is to be listed at Leeds Business Courts, I am not able to walk and this is very difficult for me to get to, am I able to change the Court please? If so, how do I do this?
Comment
-
Is your partner the person into whose name the property has been transferred? If yes, then your partner is a person who needs to be served, for the reason that the claimant is seeking an order that affects him or her.
You need to contact the court about venue and other arrangements.Lawyer (solicitor) - retired from practice, now supervising solicitor in a university law clinic. I do not advise by private message.
Guides and handbooks for Litigants in Person - :
https://legalbeagles.info/forums/for...60#post1701560
Comment
-
Hi atticusOriginally posted by atticus View PostIs your partner the person into whose name the property has been transferred? If yes, then your partner is a person who needs to be served, for the reason that the claimant is seeking an order that affects him or her.
You need to contact the court about venue and other arrangements.
Thank you for your reply. Yes, my Partner is the person whose name the property has been transferred to. can I please ask, as my Partner is now named as the 1st defendant, shouldn't he have the chance to put forward his own defence?
I have applied for the Government Initiative Breathing Space to allow me time to sort out my Late Mother's Will in which I have been left some money, and also to see if my illness makes me fit the criteria for which my Life policy was taken out to be paid out before my death, both of these things would give me some money to pay towards the claim, but my response to his application for a court order to sell my property needs to be in for this Friday, should I just complete my response and submit it for Friday, or do I notify the Claimant that I have applied for Breathing Space and I have to wait to see if I have been granted it?
Comment
-
Your partner can respond. Does he/she have a defence to put forward?
As to the urgency, I observe that your received the court papers 2 weeks ago. And yes, tell the applicant.Lawyer (solicitor) - retired from practice, now supervising solicitor in a university law clinic. I do not advise by private message.
Guides and handbooks for Litigants in Person - :
https://legalbeagles.info/forums/for...60#post1701560
Comment
View our Terms and Conditions
LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.
If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.
If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.


Comment