Hi,
My deceased fathers house was auctioned recently and I have been in contact via email with the solicitor handling the administration of the estate. I had no idea that the house was being auctioned as it was being handled by my brother (with whom I have a complicated relationship). The solicitor informed me that 'There is a restriction on the property title which stipulates that two proprietors are required to dispose of the property' and I was asked to provide them with ID, bank details etc. I am aware that my brother was sent an AS1 form to sign and return.
However, today I received an email from the solicitor informing me that 'I have had confirmation from the Land Registry that they are unable to assent the property into both your name and (brothers name) – therefore, the sale will be proceeding with (brother) as the Personal Representative of the estate of the late (fathers name). Then goes on to tell me that my assistance is no longer needed.
I feel like I have been completely cut out of the picture and I am wondering why the property can't be in two names. If the total amount of the proceeds from the sale go directly to my brother, I will get absolutely nothing.
If anyone has any advice on where I stand or if I have any come back to this I would be most grateful.
Thanks in advance.
Barry
My deceased fathers house was auctioned recently and I have been in contact via email with the solicitor handling the administration of the estate. I had no idea that the house was being auctioned as it was being handled by my brother (with whom I have a complicated relationship). The solicitor informed me that 'There is a restriction on the property title which stipulates that two proprietors are required to dispose of the property' and I was asked to provide them with ID, bank details etc. I am aware that my brother was sent an AS1 form to sign and return.
However, today I received an email from the solicitor informing me that 'I have had confirmation from the Land Registry that they are unable to assent the property into both your name and (brothers name) – therefore, the sale will be proceeding with (brother) as the Personal Representative of the estate of the late (fathers name). Then goes on to tell me that my assistance is no longer needed.
I feel like I have been completely cut out of the picture and I am wondering why the property can't be in two names. If the total amount of the proceeds from the sale go directly to my brother, I will get absolutely nothing.
If anyone has any advice on where I stand or if I have any come back to this I would be most grateful.
Thanks in advance.
Barry



Comment