Part 18 Request - some clarification

[yellowplum]

I have issued a claim form against a company for damage to my vehicle. The claim was issued on 23 May 2012 and served 25 May 2012, the Defendant filed an acknowledgement of service on 30 May 2012 meaning they had the full 28 days ending 22 June 2012.

Meanwhile the Defendant appointed a solicitor and I received an acknowledgement around 1 June 2012. On the 15 June 2012 I received a further letter from the solicitor advising hat they wanted further information on the claim and requested a Part 18 request, also informing me that they had only just received the claim form from their client.

They specifically request further information on two questions (I know and have read that part 18 is a fishing expedition to see how strong or weak your case can be) but I just wanted to clarify before sending anything back to them what I should do and how I should do it.

I have attached a copy of the Part 18 request. This has not gone in front of a judge and has come directly from the solicitor.

I have an idea of what to reply with, but I just wanted a view/opinion and some clarity over the part 18 rules. I attach the original claim form and the part 18 request.Document_Redacted.pdf

Thanks

[mystery1]

Re: Part 18 Request - some clarification

http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/pro...ules/pd_part18

http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/pro...l/rules/part18


You could also search bailii.org for part 18 and see what case law springs up.

M1