I am in dispute with our freeholder over a service charge on a long leasehold property. The SC was put in dispute in July 2007 and the freeholder bought a legal action against me in 2008, which I defended. The freeholder had not and still does not comply with the statutory requirements for SC demands. Further there has been no consultation on major works in the whole 9 years the ll has owned the property. There has been expenditure which is not in accordance with the lease. The freeholder has passed a compensation payment to one of the lessees back to the lessees through the SC!!!!
When I defended the 2008 case the freeholder withdrew citing 'procedural inadequacies in the invoices' - part of my defence. The freeholder has now started a new claim in a different Court.
Can anyone advise on the wording of a defence of a vexatious claim and a request to have the claim struck out? Is it necessary or desirable to include, in the initial response/defence, copies of the letter showing they withdrew from the previous case? Any other evidence I should include?
Thanks for any help...
When I defended the 2008 case the freeholder withdrew citing 'procedural inadequacies in the invoices' - part of my defence. The freeholder has now started a new claim in a different Court.
Can anyone advise on the wording of a defence of a vexatious claim and a request to have the claim struck out? Is it necessary or desirable to include, in the initial response/defence, copies of the letter showing they withdrew from the previous case? Any other evidence I should include?
Thanks for any help...
Comment