Question about enforcement

[Daryl32]

I won a case by default -judgment entered for a modest amount couple of hundred 3 weeks ago.
Defendant filed a defence but sent to the wrong email address.
They made an application stating had spoken to MCOL and been told claim would be reinstated and they'd get a refund of the application fee. But sent this to the wrong email as well.
I have waited three weeks, now told them they mucked up sending everything to the wrong email address and that they would have to pay the fee themselves and I am enforcing the judgment as in any case they are now out of time re: Denton.
They have pulled the same bullheaded attitude as they have all along - "we are in the right and will fight any enforcement".
As it stands they are defo in the wrong and I am now minded to go ahead with enforcement on that basis as there is no talking to them.
Thoughts?

[Daryl32]

Anybody?

[R0b]

Hello

Have they made a further application at all or communicated with the court in relation to sending the application to the wrong email address? Of course you can take enforcement action but they can then make another application and if it gets set aside, you will have to revert any enforcement carried out with any associated costs in relation to the enforcement at your expense, unless you can convince the court to reimburse you for the cost incurred in enforcement action, assuming you can't get the court to agree the judgment should stand.

[Daryl32]

Ignore this.

[Daryl32]

Hello

Have they made a further application at all or communicated with the court in relation to sending the application to the wrong email address? Of course you can take enforcement action but they can then make another application and if it gets set aside, you will have to revert any enforcement carried out with any associated costs in relation to the enforcement at your expense, unless you can convince the court to reimburse you for the cost incurred in enforcement action, assuming you can't get the court to agree the judgment should stand.

They have not. Why?

[R0b]

I was wondering, because if they did then I would tell you to not waste your time taking any enforcement action. Otherwise what I said previously still stands.