Tweet
This whole affair is shambolic.
I eventually received a copy of the court order for interim NMO back in late January. The court could not even remember the date that was agreed in the meeting for the full contested hearing. Why would they simply not listen to the audio they would/should have recorded?
Last week, I received an amended court order with a new court date and the interim NMO period cut by 6 months. It seems to me that the justice system is a joke. So poorly organised and as a litigant-in-person still I do not know whether I am coming or going.
The new order does clearly set out dates for filing information to the court. It only gives me 14 days to reply to the allegations against me then gives my sibling another period to respond to that but doesn't get me any further right to respond.
I also told the magistrates that I would very possibly want witnesses and they asked how many. At the time, I could only say, "Well it depends on what the actual allegations are!" because the statement my sibling filed was incoherent and complete nonsense. In it is an admission that they suffered hallucinations due to a particular prescribed drug they take (or when they fail to take it).
Any advice on this post or 12th January post would still be very much appreciated.
I eventually received a copy of the court order for interim NMO back in late January. The court could not even remember the date that was agreed in the meeting for the full contested hearing. Why would they simply not listen to the audio they would/should have recorded?
Last week, I received an amended court order with a new court date and the interim NMO period cut by 6 months. It seems to me that the justice system is a joke. So poorly organised and as a litigant-in-person still I do not know whether I am coming or going.
The new order does clearly set out dates for filing information to the court. It only gives me 14 days to reply to the allegations against me then gives my sibling another period to respond to that but doesn't get me any further right to respond.
I also told the magistrates that I would very possibly want witnesses and they asked how many. At the time, I could only say, "Well it depends on what the actual allegations are!" because the statement my sibling filed was incoherent and complete nonsense. In it is an admission that they suffered hallucinations due to a particular prescribed drug they take (or when they fail to take it).
Any advice on this post or 12th January post would still be very much appreciated.
Comment