• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.
  • If you need direct help with your employment issue you can contact us at admin@legalbeaglesgroup.com for further assistance. This will give you access to “off-forum” support on a one-to- one basis from an experienced employment law expert for which we would welcome that you make a donation to help towards their time spent assisting on your matter. You can do this by clicking on the donate button in the box below.

CRB Disclosure

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Re: CRB Disclosure

    Originally posted by smileyculture View Post
    Why does no one argue what discrimination really means?
    At the end of the day Smiley, if you feel that strongly about it, then only you can do that. Why don't you?

    We've all tried to give you the benefit of our experiences here. I believe they would find a totally different reason for having dismissed you, and be successful in doing so. However, it would be for you to prove the dismissal had been discriminatory. :beagle:

    Comment


    • #32
      Re: CRB Disclosure

      I am employed by a school and am currently looking at the relevant part of my application form for a new post which states that 'Jobs in schools are exempt from the provisions of Section 4(2) of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974. You must therefore declare any convictions, bind-overs, cautions or reprimands and give details of the offences'.

      'If there are any convictions, they have to be documented in a sealed envelope which has to be sent with the job application and to the referees if you are selected for interview'.

      Whilst applying for my current post, I noticed that pages 5-11 were concerned with Recruitment Monitoring. My CRB took about 6 weeks to clear which I believe is fairly prompt.

      Apologies for going off topic.
      Last edited by ruthie59; 11th August 2013, 14:19:PM. Reason: Language

      Comment


      • #33
        Re: CRB Disclosure

        Not off topic at all Ruthie, it's good to have your input. :tinysmile_grin_t: I think you're right. From the bit I've done in education, it's normal for what you have described or similar to be required. There was a time when CRB checks were taking a whole term to come back. :beagle:

        Comment


        • #34
          Re: CRB Disclosure

          Good posts again, labman, I am aiming to. It stands out that so many people are reading the meaning of the act wrong. I have even heard that if you get over two and a half years, you can never be rehabilitated, amazing if you think about it. All it refers to is, that you have to disclose if you have previous convictions, spent or unspent. I have even been told that some HR think you cannot work in a school with a criminal record, sad but true. I also see wales view but there is a recent case where damages and costs were awarded , over 450K and because they didn't get the job. Will keep posted on this one,thanks all

          Comment


          • #35
            Re: CRB Disclosure

            I honestly wish you luck with this. I have employed people with a criminal record which had to be disclosed, and those that know me will know how relevant that is to your position.

            It is a shame that those who have genuinely changed their ways have it held against them for good when it is no longer relevant to their position.

            Comment


            • #36
              Re: CRB Disclosure

              Couldn't agree more, Labman.Sometimes I think we're in a no-win situation. Please keep us informed and all the best.

              Comment


              • #37
                Re: CRB Disclosure

                Originally posted by smileyculture View Post
                The reason given for the dismissal was a long time coming and it stated that the offence was different from what I had stated. This then raises questions as to who is telling the truth. If I did not disclose it, how could I then tell them something different? The answer lies in another added offence that did not appear on the CRB.
                "stated that the offence was different from what I had stated". If they themselves have said that in writing, and you can demonstrate that what you had told them is true, then if you're fighting your ex-employer you may be going after the wrong target. You might consider using your ex-employer's own evidence to stuff the Home Office for the same damages in the recently consolidated intentional economic tort procurement of breach of contract - if you're a LIP, you might run it as a small claim to secure your costs position at the price of limiting damages to 10k. What baffles me however is what you mean by "The answer lies in another added offence that did not appear on the CRB". Please explain?

                all just words, not legal advice

                Comment


                • #38
                  Re: CRB Disclosure

                  Originally posted by bluebottle View Post
                  You are aware that Capita runs the Criminal Records Bureau on behalf of the Home Office? With Capita's reputation for cocking things up, they have made grave errors in the past that have wrecked people's lives and then refused to accept responsibility, even though they have been clearly shown to be at fault. Do not rule-out Capita having made errors. Check.
                  CRB was always going to cock it up with or without Capita's generous assistance.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Re: CRB Disclosure

                    Originally posted by bluebottle View Post
                    Screening would have been better carried out by the Criminal Records Office (CRO) which is staffed by publicly-accountable civil servants, not outsourced to a private-sector company with a history of incompetence.
                    I hope you're not talking about ACRO, the ACPO Criminal Records Office? That's a private-sector company with... ok, I'll let you connect the dots.

                    Edit: This is what the police think of their own bosses:

                    "20 THINGS YOU WON’T HEAR FROM ACPO...
                    ...
                    9. We’ve all been fiddling crime statistics & detections for so long; we’ve forgotten how to
                    do it legitimately..."

                    p27 of http://www.theftprotect.co.uk/librar...20Officers.pdf

                    And that was in 2010...

                    Regrettably it's the 5 million fiddled fantasy crimes (Home Office's own statistics) that go into CRB enhanced disclosures...

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Re: CRB Disclosure

                      Originally posted by smileyculture View Post
                      That is not how I see discrimination, the wording clearly does not include protected characters, it says, all registered bodies must treat DBS applicants who have a criminal record fairly and do not discriminate because of a conviction or other information revealed. Why does no one argue what discrimination really means?
                      Because it's all just fluffy words, the DBS doesn't bother investigating or enforcing it anyway, not their remit and well outside whatever competence they might proved to have. (I'd love to be proved wrong!)

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Re: CRB Disclosure

                        I think proving you wrong on that point ,would be near impossible. In answer to an earlier question, a conviction that I declared was not included on the CRB, the HR then made the excuse that I misled them, which I clearly did not. I will be looking into the point you made, thanks.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Re: CRB Disclosure

                          CRB is now DBS.

                          https://www.gov.uk/government/organi...arring-service
                          CAVEAT LECTOR

                          This is only my opinion - "Opinions are made to be changed --or how is truth to be got at?" (Byron)

                          You and I do not see things as they are. We see things as we are.
                          Cohen, Herb


                          There is danger when a man throws his tongue into high gear before he
                          gets his brain a-going.
                          Phelps, C. C.


                          "They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance!"
                          The last words of John Sedgwick

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Re: CRB Disclosure

                            Originally posted by charitynjw View Post
                            Shades of Romeo and Juliet, "A rose by any other name ......."

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Re: CRB Disclosure

                              Originally posted by labman View Post
                              Shades of Romeo and Juliet, "A rose by any other name ......."
                              So young, yet so cynical!



                              CAVEAT LECTOR

                              This is only my opinion - "Opinions are made to be changed --or how is truth to be got at?" (Byron)

                              You and I do not see things as they are. We see things as we are.
                              Cohen, Herb


                              There is danger when a man throws his tongue into high gear before he
                              gets his brain a-going.
                              Phelps, C. C.


                              "They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance!"
                              The last words of John Sedgwick

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Re: CRB Disclosure

                                Mr Knopfler I think from 'Brothers in Arms' ? Excellent music!

                                Comment

                                View our Terms and Conditions

                                LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                                If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                                If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.

                                Announcement

                                Collapse

                                Welcome to LegalBeagles


                                Donate with PayPal button

                                LegalBeagles is a free forum, founded in May 2007, providing legal guidance and support to consumers and SME's across a range of legal areas.

                                See more
                                See less

                                Court Claim ?

                                Guides and Letters
                                Loading...



                                Search and Compare fixed fee legal services and find a solicitor near you.

                                Find a Law Firm


                                Working...
                                X