Tweet
Re: Wrongly handled?
I return to my post where I suggested she become a 'whistleblower.' She may then regain some element of trustworthiness with the company on who she is reliant for a reference; she will morally go a way to righting her wrongdoing and she will save us, the public, a few pennies by stopping this sort of practice in at least one store, and possibly a chain of stores.
The rest I think she needs to put down to experience. I agree with you entirely about the 'Private and Confidential' bit, but I wonder if whoever made the announcement was daft enough to actually name your SD, or just say, 'We have had an incident come to light recently where x, y and z happened resulting in the suspension of two members of staff in one of our stores ............' I suspect that would be more the truth unless they are really foolhardy. People are then left to draw their own conclusions, correct or otherwise.
I return to my post where I suggested she become a 'whistleblower.' She may then regain some element of trustworthiness with the company on who she is reliant for a reference; she will morally go a way to righting her wrongdoing and she will save us, the public, a few pennies by stopping this sort of practice in at least one store, and possibly a chain of stores.
The rest I think she needs to put down to experience. I agree with you entirely about the 'Private and Confidential' bit, but I wonder if whoever made the announcement was daft enough to actually name your SD, or just say, 'We have had an incident come to light recently where x, y and z happened resulting in the suspension of two members of staff in one of our stores ............' I suspect that would be more the truth unless they are really foolhardy. People are then left to draw their own conclusions, correct or otherwise.
(that's a 'twink', not a blink!)
Comment