I work for a local authority (B) and my substantive post has been deleted, however I was able to secure a secondment to another authority (W) until 22 April and B continue to be my employer invoicing W for my salary. W agreed to extend this secondment to the 22 October and issued a renewed secondment agreement to this effect. I have both email and verbal agreements from B and W that all parties are happy with the extension, however I am the only one who has signed to date.
At my 1-2-1 today W encouraged me to sign the agreement and not to wait for B to do so which I duly did. At the end of the meeting I informed W that I am 12 wks pg with twins. I am beginning to show, there is a limit to how many jumpers I can wear in a hot office and I don't want to continue lying about medical appts.
W was nice and congratulated me but said that he would now seek HR advice to retract my secondment agreement and just extend it to June when I go on maternity leave and not Oct. He said he does not want me on maternity leave whilst working for them due to budgetary implications. He suggested we both seek HR advice from our respective people.
i have mentioned that employment law protects discrimination against pregnancy and the limiting of opportunities or unfair treatment due to the condition. Also, that he 'needed' me until Oct at the start of the meeting and now he wanted to limit my time with the organisation!. He said that a secondment agreement is not the same as an employment contract and hence did not apply in this situation. The maternity leave was for B to sort out and the fact that I had no substantive post to return to may affect my eligibility for maternity pu.
I have sent an urgent email to HR at B to check all this out but have not heard back yet. I also called ACAS and they confirmed my brief reading that I cannot be discriminated against.
my questions are:
- is a secondment agreement covered by employment law as an employment contract would and hence W cannot just reissue the agreement due to me being pregnant?
- given that the only reason I am employed by B is because of the secondment and all parties had agreed to extend to Oct mean that B are liable for me until then even if W does not want me beyond June now?
Help!!!
At my 1-2-1 today W encouraged me to sign the agreement and not to wait for B to do so which I duly did. At the end of the meeting I informed W that I am 12 wks pg with twins. I am beginning to show, there is a limit to how many jumpers I can wear in a hot office and I don't want to continue lying about medical appts.
W was nice and congratulated me but said that he would now seek HR advice to retract my secondment agreement and just extend it to June when I go on maternity leave and not Oct. He said he does not want me on maternity leave whilst working for them due to budgetary implications. He suggested we both seek HR advice from our respective people.
i have mentioned that employment law protects discrimination against pregnancy and the limiting of opportunities or unfair treatment due to the condition. Also, that he 'needed' me until Oct at the start of the meeting and now he wanted to limit my time with the organisation!. He said that a secondment agreement is not the same as an employment contract and hence did not apply in this situation. The maternity leave was for B to sort out and the fact that I had no substantive post to return to may affect my eligibility for maternity pu.
I have sent an urgent email to HR at B to check all this out but have not heard back yet. I also called ACAS and they confirmed my brief reading that I cannot be discriminated against.
my questions are:
- is a secondment agreement covered by employment law as an employment contract would and hence W cannot just reissue the agreement due to me being pregnant?
- given that the only reason I am employed by B is because of the secondment and all parties had agreed to extend to Oct mean that B are liable for me until then even if W does not want me beyond June now?
Help!!!
Comment