• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.
  • If you need direct help with your employment issue you can contact us at admin@legalbeaglesgroup.com for further assistance. This will give you access to “off-forum” support on a one-to- one basis from an experienced employment law expert for which we would welcome that you make a donation to help towards their time spent assisting on your matter. You can do this by clicking on the donate button in the box below.

Unfair Dismissal (April 2012 changes)

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Unfair Dismissal (April 2012 changes)

    Judges to sit alone in unfair dismissal cases.
    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2012/988/made

    Qualifying period for unfair dismissal now 2 years for persons employed after 6th April 2012.
    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2012/989/made
    CAVEAT LECTOR

    This is only my opinion - "Opinions are made to be changed --or how is truth to be got at?" (Byron)

    You and I do not see things as they are. We see things as we are.
    Cohen, Herb


    There is danger when a man throws his tongue into high gear before he
    gets his brain a-going.
    Phelps, C. C.


    "They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance!"
    The last words of John Sedgwick
    Tags: None

  • #2
    Re: Unfair Dismissal (April 2012 changes)

    The 2 years is an absolute disgrace, some employers will be busy around the 23rd month having a clear out to evade the law.

    Also Charity - can you clarify the pros and cons of judges sitting alone for me (I need the idiots' guide).

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Unfair Dismissal (April 2012 changes)

      Hi Shadowcat,

      Previously, the panel consisted of the Tribunal Judge & 2 lay 'wing' members, one from the 'employer's' field, one from the 'employees'.
      This latest development is probably a cost-saving measure.
      CAVEAT LECTOR

      This is only my opinion - "Opinions are made to be changed --or how is truth to be got at?" (Byron)

      You and I do not see things as they are. We see things as we are.
      Cohen, Herb


      There is danger when a man throws his tongue into high gear before he
      gets his brain a-going.
      Phelps, C. C.


      "They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance!"
      The last words of John Sedgwick

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Unfair Dismissal (April 2012 changes)

        http://www.morgan-cole.com/services/...ilchanges.html


        The Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) (Amendment) Regulations 2012 come into force on 6 April and for cases presented on or after 6 April 2012 the Regulations provide for the following:
        • Deposit orders - the maximum deposit Employment Tribunals can order a party to pay if their case has little reasonable prospect of success increases from £500 to £1,000
        • Cost awards - the maximum amount of costs Employment Tribunals can award increases from £10,000 to £20,000.
        • Witness statements - these are taken 'as read' unless the Employment Judge directs otherwise.
        • Witness expenses - these are no longer to be funded by the state and Employment Tribunals have the power to direct the parties to bear the cost of witnesses’ attendance.
        • Employment Judges sitting alone in unfair dismissal cases rather than with two lay members - this applies for cases heard on or after 6 April 2012 unless the Employment Judge directs otherwise. The government will review this provision after a year.
        CAVEAT LECTOR

        This is only my opinion - "Opinions are made to be changed --or how is truth to be got at?" (Byron)

        You and I do not see things as they are. We see things as we are.
        Cohen, Herb


        There is danger when a man throws his tongue into high gear before he
        gets his brain a-going.
        Phelps, C. C.


        "They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance!"
        The last words of John Sedgwick

        Comment

        View our Terms and Conditions

        LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

        If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


        If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.

        Announcement

        Collapse

        Welcome to LegalBeagles


        Donate with PayPal button

        LegalBeagles is a free forum, founded in May 2007, providing legal guidance and support to consumers and SME's across a range of legal areas.

        See more
        See less

        Court Claim ?

        Guides and Letters
        Loading...



        Search and Compare fixed fee legal services and find a solicitor near you.

        Find a Law Firm


        Working...
        X