Re: No signed Contract of Employment + overpayment
About time I updated this.
From the start (ie original Grievance Procedure) to finish (Employment Tribunal hearing) was just over 2 years.
Claim was for constructive dismissal + disability discrimination (under pre Equality Act law).
Claimant was LIP.
All the ducks were in a row (after extensive research on Employment law legislation & case law).
ACAS - all they did was contacted by post on a few occasions with the latest paltry Part 36 offer.
DD knocked out at a Pre-Hearing Review - despite a ton of supporting evidence & legal precedent.
Then at the main hearing, now down to constructive dismissal only, it was made very clear (insinuated) by the Tribunal that if my friend did not come to an out-of-court settlement, the Tribunal's decision would probably not be..................(I don't think I need to go further, you can probably sense the same sinking feeling!)
I won't bore you with the numerous details of legal sophistry & shennanigans leading up to this.
What I will say, though, is that I doubt whether either the ET or the respondents sols would have dared to act in this manner if there had been legal representation for the claimant.
& yes, Without Prejudice agreement made!
About time I updated this.
From the start (ie original Grievance Procedure) to finish (Employment Tribunal hearing) was just over 2 years.
Claim was for constructive dismissal + disability discrimination (under pre Equality Act law).
Claimant was LIP.
All the ducks were in a row (after extensive research on Employment law legislation & case law).
ACAS - all they did was contacted by post on a few occasions with the latest paltry Part 36 offer.
DD knocked out at a Pre-Hearing Review - despite a ton of supporting evidence & legal precedent.
Then at the main hearing, now down to constructive dismissal only, it was made very clear (insinuated) by the Tribunal that if my friend did not come to an out-of-court settlement, the Tribunal's decision would probably not be..................(I don't think I need to go further, you can probably sense the same sinking feeling!)
I won't bore you with the numerous details of legal sophistry & shennanigans leading up to this.
What I will say, though, is that I doubt whether either the ET or the respondents sols would have dared to act in this manner if there had been legal representation for the claimant.
& yes, Without Prejudice agreement made!
Comment