I recently saw that uber drivers are again taking uber to court after their supreme Court case win defining them as workers.
This made me look at their tribunal ruling and has me questioning the definition of my current employment.
I work as and consider myself a sole trader as a flooring installer(carpet, laminate etc).
I only work for 1 shop, never do any private work nor advertise as such, this is mainly as the shop has me working 5 days 1 week, 6 days the next not allowing for independent work. I can take time off as and when I see fit providing enough notice is provided that I will be unavailable.
the shop sets all the prices for installation and these are non-negotiable.
the shop determines what work I do, where I work and how much, work cannot be rejected or refused.
failure to complete the work to a satisfactory standard can result in financial penalties, or restriction/removal of work.
The shop also runs a "free fitting" service. This works by the customer of the shop being given a total price for carpet, accessories and installation then the price of installation being taken off the total leaving a "balancing payment" to be paid on the day direct to myself, the store is effectively paying for the work.
Given the tribunal rulings for uber, and definitions I could find on the citizens advice website I am curious given how this business model is setup whether or not I am classed as a employee, worker or contractor and entitled to the rights therein, such as holiday pay.
To clarify yes I am registered self employed and provide my own vehicle, tools etc but the store provides all materials required.
This made me look at their tribunal ruling and has me questioning the definition of my current employment.
I work as and consider myself a sole trader as a flooring installer(carpet, laminate etc).
I only work for 1 shop, never do any private work nor advertise as such, this is mainly as the shop has me working 5 days 1 week, 6 days the next not allowing for independent work. I can take time off as and when I see fit providing enough notice is provided that I will be unavailable.
the shop sets all the prices for installation and these are non-negotiable.
the shop determines what work I do, where I work and how much, work cannot be rejected or refused.
failure to complete the work to a satisfactory standard can result in financial penalties, or restriction/removal of work.
The shop also runs a "free fitting" service. This works by the customer of the shop being given a total price for carpet, accessories and installation then the price of installation being taken off the total leaving a "balancing payment" to be paid on the day direct to myself, the store is effectively paying for the work.
Given the tribunal rulings for uber, and definitions I could find on the citizens advice website I am curious given how this business model is setup whether or not I am classed as a employee, worker or contractor and entitled to the rights therein, such as holiday pay.
To clarify yes I am registered self employed and provide my own vehicle, tools etc but the store provides all materials required.
Comment