• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Witness order

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Witness order

    A quick question. Can a tribunal of its own accord send a witness order without an application from either side?
    Tags: None

  • #2
    Yes a witness order can be issued on the initiative of an employment judge.


    I do not provide advice by PM although I may on occasion ask you to send me documents this way but any related advice will be provided back on your thread.

    I do my best to provide good practical advice, however I do so without liability.
    If you have any doubts then do please seek professional legal advice.


    You can’t always stop the waves but you can learn to surf.

    You are braver than you believe, smarter than you think and stronger than you seem.



    If we have helped you we'd appreciate it if you can leave a review on our Trust Pilot page

    Comment


    • #3
      Thanks ULA.

      Comment


      • #4
        ULA, in this case what has happened is we have a whistleblowing unfair dismissal and detriment claim against the company and an individual, who has now left the company.
        Their solicitor is representing them both still. The final hearing is next Tuesday. On Friday I hand delivered our statements to the tribunal office at around 12pm. At 3.15pm I got a notice from the tribunal that a witness order has been sent to the respondent who is the individual.

        she was obviously already named as a witness and has produced a witness statement. Her conduct in the matter in question has been shocking to say the least. Do you think the judge would have made the order to make sure she attends ? I can’t see their solicitor asking for the order as to me, that would seem like a sign of guilt ?

        Comment


        • #5
          The whole basis of a witness order is to compel a witness to attend a hearing and if they fail to attend without reasonable excuse it is a criminal offence. So on that basis I would assume the judge has done this to ensure that the person attends.


          I do not provide advice by PM although I may on occasion ask you to send me documents this way but any related advice will be provided back on your thread.

          I do my best to provide good practical advice, however I do so without liability.
          If you have any doubts then do please seek professional legal advice.


          You can’t always stop the waves but you can learn to surf.

          You are braver than you believe, smarter than you think and stronger than you seem.



          If we have helped you we'd appreciate it if you can leave a review on our Trust Pilot page

          Comment


          • #6
            ULA, as a respondent would she not have been compelled to be there without the order ?

            Comment


            • #7
              In isolation of any other information I cannot say whether there has been an indication that one of the respondent's was not intending to be present at the hearing and just be represented by the solicitor. This will ensure this does not happen and they will be in attendance to present their evidence.


              I do not provide advice by PM although I may on occasion ask you to send me documents this way but any related advice will be provided back on your thread.

              I do my best to provide good practical advice, however I do so without liability.
              If you have any doubts then do please seek professional legal advice.


              You can’t always stop the waves but you can learn to surf.

              You are braver than you believe, smarter than you think and stronger than you seem.



              If we have helped you we'd appreciate it if you can leave a review on our Trust Pilot page

              Comment


              • #8
                Makes more sense now. The first respondent have basically threw the individual respondent under the bus and blamed her for everything. The tribunal must be dubious of this, as I am, so want her there to see if that is the case.

                Comment

                View our Terms and Conditions

                LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
                Working...
                X