Court Claim - SLL Capital Limited / Full Pocket Ltd (dissolved in 2014) - 20-3-2015

[FlamingParrot]

Re: Court Claim - SLL Capital Limited / Full Pocket Ltd (dissolved in 2014) - 20-3-2

Thanks, will do. The hearing is in just over 4 weeks... I could presumably just show the judge my bank statements showing my benefits if absolutely necessary. Hopefully the DWP send out confirmation letters on request just in case.

You can ask the DWP to provide you with a letter stating you are on receipt of benefits, you should be able to get one printed out for you at the Jobcentre. :typing:

Having said that, being in receipt of benefits is not really a defence to the claim, the claimant can still obtain judgment if the judge finds the agreement, the assignment, etc. are all kosher. The court can't order you to pay what you haven't got but you could still get a CCJ, even if you only pay £1/month towards it.

[nemesis45]

Re: Court Claim - SLL Capital Limited / Full Pocket Ltd (dissolved in 2014) - 20-3-2

Check out the event history of 'Simpsons Legal Limited' - http://companycheck.co.uk/company/08...-LEGAL-LIMITED

The double act are up to something fishy here as well. They've also ceased trading from Safeloans Limited, yet that website redirects to 'Mr Lender' another payday lender. Got their filthy mitts in many pies.

I know I beginning to wonder how they are getting away with all this.
The ins and outs of the board make interesting reading on both " companies".

nem

[highwire]

Re: Court Claim - SLL Capital Limited / Full Pocket Ltd (dissolved in 2014) - 20-3-2

Shah and Bryant a poor double act and really need reporting to the FCA for their appalling conduct.
A poacher turned gamekeeper of the worst sort.

I think he's toned down his approach somewhat of late!!

nem

Check out the event history of 'Simpsons Legal Limited' - http://companycheck.co.uk/company/08...-LEGAL-LIMITED

The double act are up to something fishy here as well. They've also ceased trading from Safeloans Limited, yet that website redirects to 'Mr Lender' another payday lender. Got their filthy mitts in many pies.

[nemesis45]

Re: Court Claim - SLL Capital Limited / Full Pocket Ltd (dissolved in 2014) - 20-3-2

Shah and Bryant a poor double act and really need reporting to the FCA for their appalling conduct.
A poacher turned gamekeeper of the worst sort.

I think he's toned down his approach somewhat of late!!

nem

[highwire]

Re: Court Claim - SLL Capital Limited / Full Pocket Ltd (dissolved in 2014) - 20-3-2

Mr Shah is a one man band basically I have had " experiences" with him over the years, at one point not to long ago a company check showed he had left the board a short time later he " joined" the board again I trust him not.

What professional Debt Collection has the company " owner" shouting down the phone " pay me".

Any info you think relevant re his behaviour and the conduct of his business should be reported to the FCA " for information".

nem

Thanks nem. I'd love to hear some of your experiences with the man. I've also dealt with Mark Bryant who seems slightly more human but still completely dismissive of the laws and regulations they are bound by. There is only one way to describe this outfit, and that is COWBOYS.

There is not one shred of professionalism with this lot. Apparently they operate from a Portacabin yet claim to have over '50,000 customers'. They also claim to 'help customers become debt free', yet their registered company name is Safe Loans Limited, a payday lender. A conflict of interest that a judge should know about too me thinks :tinysmile_twink_t2:

[nemesis45]

Re: Court Claim - SLL Capital Limited / Full Pocket Ltd (dissolved in 2014) - 20-3-2

Thanks, will do. The hearing is in just over 4 weeks... I could presumably just show the judge my bank statements showing my benefits if absolutely necessary. Hopefully the DWP send out confirmation letters on request just in case.

I will report them to the FCA again. Ravi Shah is the person I've been dealing with. He has complete dismissal for everything I send to him. It's like a parrot's conversation back and forth with mind numbing repetition -
- "Pay me"
- "You haven't proved my liability to you and either way I have no money"
- "Pay me"
- "You haven't proved my liability to you and either way I have no money"-
- "Pay me"

And so on and so forth

Mr Shah is a one man band basically I have had " experiences" with him over the years, at one point not to long ago a company check showed he had left the board a short time later he " joined" the board again I trust him not.

What professional Debt Collection has the company " owner" shouting down the phone " pay me".

Any info you think relevant re his behaviour and the conduct of his business should be reported to the FCA " for information".

nem

[highwire]

Re: Court Claim - SLL Capital Limited / Full Pocket Ltd (dissolved in 2014) - 20-3-2

Thanks, will do. The hearing is in just over 4 weeks... I could presumably just show the judge my bank statements showing my benefits if absolutely necessary. Hopefully the DWP send out confirmation letters on request just in case.

I will report them to the FCA again. Ravi Shah is the person I've been dealing with. He has complete dismissal for everything I send to him. It's like a parrot's conversation back and forth with mind numbing repetition -
- "Pay me"
- "You haven't proved my liability to you and either way I have no money"
- "Pay me"
- "You haven't proved my liability to you and either way I have no money"-
- "Pay me"

And so on and so forth

[FlamingParrot]

Re: Court Claim - SLL Capital Limited / Full Pocket Ltd (dissolved in 2014) - 20-3-2

So I emailed them my most recent letter from DWP today confirming my benefit entitlements and what I get paid a week.... SLL emailed me straight back stating that my 'evidence was outdated' and that it is their understanding that I am currently employed. WTF!!

Whatever their understanding is, has very little relevance in court, it's all about facts, not opinions.

The letter I sent them is dated May this year, how are they taking this to mean that I am by some miracle now employed?! They go on to ask me to come to a payment arrangement with my surplus income. I think they may be slightly retarded, bless them.

:sad:

I've lost all patience with this lot now. I can't wait to see what a judge makes of them. My witness statement is quite brutal and includes all their unlawful threats (they told me a bailiff could break in to recover goods if I didn't settle their judgement against me!) - What judgement, it hasn't been heard in court yet!!
:juge:

That sort of threat should be reported to the FCA, they don't act for you personally but will consider such reports when it comes to renewing consumer credit licenses. I would have thought that goes against the principles set out here: https://fshandbook.info/FS/html/FCA/CONC/7/3

A firm must treat customers in default or in arrears difficulties with forbearance and due consideration.

Examples of treating a customer with forbearance would include the firm doing one or more of the following, as may be relevant in the circumstances:

(1) considering suspending, reducing, waiving or cancelling any further interest or charges (for example, when a customer provides evidence of financial difficulties and is unable to meet repayments as they fall due or is only able to make token repayments, where in either case the level of debt would continue to rise if interest and charges continue to be applied);

[nemesis45]

Re: Court Claim - SLL Capital Limited / Full Pocket Ltd (dissolved in 2014) - 20-3-2

So I emailed them my most recent letter from DWP today confirming my benefit entitlements and what I get paid a week.... SLL emailed me straight back stating that my 'evidence was outdated' and that it is their understanding that I am currently employed. WTF!!

The letter I sent them is dated May this year, how are they taking this to mean that I am by some miracle now employed?! They go on to ask me to come to a payment arrangement with my surplus income. I think they may be slightly retarded, bless them.

I've lost all patience with this lot now. I can't wait to see what a judge makes of them. My witness statement is quite brutal and includes all their unlawful threats (they told me a bailiff could break in to recover goods if I didn't settle their judgement against me!) - What judgement, it hasn't been heard in court yet!!
:juge:

I would make a formal request to SLL as a separate matter over the allegations that you are lying requiring
them to disclose where they are getting this information.
Mr RS Shah used to be the king pin at SLL so take it to him personally.
nem

[jon1965]

Re: Court Claim - SLL Capital Limited / Full Pocket Ltd (dissolved in 2014) - 20-3-2

I would give the DWP a call and ask them for a current entitlement letter. Also once you have a court date get another one for the judge. He might have words to say to them

[highwire]

Re: Court Claim - SLL Capital Limited / Full Pocket Ltd (dissolved in 2014) - 20-3-2

So I emailed them my most recent letter from DWP today confirming my benefit entitlements and what I get paid a week.... SLL emailed me straight back stating that my 'evidence was outdated' and that it is their understanding that I am currently employed. WTF!!

The letter I sent them is dated May this year, how are they taking this to mean that I am by some miracle now employed?! They go on to ask me to come to a payment arrangement with my surplus income. I think they may be slightly retarded, bless them.

I've lost all patience with this lot now. I can't wait to see what a judge makes of them. My witness statement is quite brutal and includes all their unlawful threats (they told me a bailiff could break in to recover goods if I didn't settle their judgement against me!) - What judgement, it hasn't been heard in court yet!!
:juge:

[jon1965]

Re: Court Claim - SLL Capital Limited / Full Pocket Ltd (dissolved in 2014) - 20-3-2

Thanks FP, I did indeed mean the Deed of assignment . The original ruling relied on was made by Lord Denning and although it is an idea put forward by the FMOTL movement whose ideas are in most part dangerous I was assured by someone who is respected and works in this field that they do have a legal basis.

Highwire, I agree with you that to a great extent once you take control of your debts and stop being intimidated by the creditors it is empowering . I will admit I have written the odd letter that were probably best left unwritten and I would not want them to be shown in court , I think I called one manager at a recently purchased large debt purchaser a ****wit , true but hardly professional . I also believe that where court action is concerned creditors go for the easy pickings, those with assets, those that completely ignore them etc although I do know people who do ignore them.
Best of luck and I hope it works out for you, if we can help further just shout

[highwire]

Re: Court Claim - SLL Capital Limited / Full Pocket Ltd (dissolved in 2014) - 20-3-2

I'll send them my DWP award forms and explain (for the nth time) that they have little chance of ever recovering their court fees let alone the sum claimed for. See what they come back with. A CCJ won't affect me in the slightest. I have 5 recent defaults, over 12k of debts and DCAs chasing left right and centre. This is the first court proceedings I've had though.

Tbh, if I did get a CCJ i'd probably be in a position whereby a Debt Relief Order would sort me out. Would still be 6 years of no access to further debt (via a good credit file) and save all the hassle of further imminent court claims :tea:.

When you're so deep in the s**t, it actually becomes easier to wave two fingers at the lot of them (DCAs). They can try their best, but they can't squeeze me for what I haven't got. It might seem like a really odd thing to say, but I actually quite enjoy dealing with these parasites just to see what dirty move they try to pull next!

[FlamingParrot]

Re: Court Claim - SLL Capital Limited / Full Pocket Ltd (dissolved in 2014) - 20-3-2

I must admit I did send a copy of my award letter from the DWP to some, it did seem to work.

Providing the Notice of assignment is a moot point but I believe they should provide it even if redacted. I know PT2537 agreed with that (unless he was humouring me as he knows I do not have the proverbial pot)

There is no issue with the notice of assignment or any reason why it should be redacted, what PT was referring to was the deed of assignment which could include other accounts purchased at the same time and other commercially sensitive information regarding a contract between two parties not including the defendant. If I remember correctly, it was the judge who agreed with that idea. :grin:

I think a problem is that they can probably be able to get away with sending the documents after you put in your defence unless you had requested an extension and stay but that area is not my best area.

The can send the documents at any time, regardless of whether an extension was agreed or not, and there's a case that had been stayed for months because the claimant had not replied to the defence, they've now supplied the documents (well, at least some of them).

The problem with relying purely on ss77-79 CCA issues is that non-compliance doesn't make the account irredeemably unenforceable, the breach can be rectified at any time. Of course there will always be some claimants who can't obtain any documents from the original lender who no longer has an interest in the account and have to be discontinued. ray:

I know getting a CCJ is a pain but they will lose out, lets face it it will take them 10 years to get the fees back at which point you could possily stop paying and they would be stuffed

A CCJ can have more or less impact depending on your circumstances. In some cases, you may even lose your job or not be able to find another one for six years whilst it's on record. On the other hand, there are many people who are not affected by them at all, they just pay whatever they can every month, it can be as little as £1 a month as long as the instalments are agreed with the court and backed with an income and expenditure statement. :thumb:

[jon1965]

Re: Court Claim - SLL Capital Limited / Full Pocket Ltd (dissolved in 2014) - 20-3-2

I must admit I did send a copy of my award letter from the DWP to some, it did seem to work.

Providing the Notice of assignment is a moot point but I believe they should provide it even if redacted. I know PT2537 agreed with that (unless he was humouring me as he knows I do not have the proverbial pot)

I think a problem is that they can probably be able to get away with sending the documents after you put in your defence unless you had requested an extension and stay but that area is not my best area.

I know getting a CCJ is a pain but they will lose out, lets face it it will take them 10 years to get the fees back at which point you could possily stop paying and they would be stuffed