We are in the process of taking a trader to small claims court. We've filed our claim and they've filed their defence which runs into several pages.
But something has just dawned on me. My claim was just a couple of sentences outlining the basic issue whilst their defence goes into great detail.
Should my claim have been a lot more detailed? Clearly outlining the back-and-forth? Should I have also filed all my evidence (copies of emails/photos etc.)?
I ask because I've since noticed that the Civil Practice Rules 8.5 (1) states:
"The claimant must file any written evidence on which he intends to rely when he files his claim form."
It's going to be pretty hard to fight my case without being able to show any evidence.
But something has just dawned on me. My claim was just a couple of sentences outlining the basic issue whilst their defence goes into great detail.
Should my claim have been a lot more detailed? Clearly outlining the back-and-forth? Should I have also filed all my evidence (copies of emails/photos etc.)?
I ask because I've since noticed that the Civil Practice Rules 8.5 (1) states:
"The claimant must file any written evidence on which he intends to rely when he files his claim form."
It's going to be pretty hard to fight my case without being able to show any evidence.
Comment