• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Used car advise.

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Used car advise.

    Hi,

    First time using this forum so hello to everyone and thanks in advance for any help you may be able to give re below.

    My wife and I bought a used car (a 2006 mazda 5 1.8) last week from a trader with 86,000 miles recorded. He advertised the car as being mechanically 100% and it looked and drove great when we went to test drive it. We traded in our old car, paid a deposit then picked the car up a couple of days later, paying the remainder of the balance in cash, being given a receipt.

    A couple of days later, I'd noticed the oil on the dipstick measured low. I figured I would top it up (with the manufacturer recommended oil mentioned in the manual) and monitor this to make sure it wasn't just a one off before contacting the trader again. I had to top up again - albeit not much, as the car only does 20 or so miles per day, nursery run, work then home.

    Three days after collecting the car it juddered and misfired on changing down from 5th to 4th and the engine management light came on. I'd noticed some smoke coming out of the exhaust too. I read the code with a bluetooth code reader which was reported as "P0304 - Cylinder 4 Misfire"

    It was at this point that I contacted the trader and arranged with him that I would have my own mechanic look at it, and if it turned out to be something relatively easy to fix, such as spark plugs / leads - he would send a cheque to cover the costs. If my mechanic found that it was something more serious I agreed to let the trader know and he would arrange for his own mechanic to look at it.

    My wife left the car in and our mechanic advised that the cause of the fault was that there was oil around the spark plugs, causing the misfire, indicating that there was potentially a more serious problem with the engine. He advised that the fault could be fixed temporarily by replacing the spark plugs but that in all likelihood, was going to re-occur suggesting a new engine or a complete engine overhaul should sort it.

    Our mechanic was asked to not do anything further and I explained to him the car had only been bought a week ago and was advertised with a 30 day warranty. He suggested we ask for our money back and to be wary of any quick fix, such as simple spark plug replacement and mopping up of excess oil around the top of the engine block.

    On thinking about it and on the back of this advice, my wife and I would prefer a refund to allow us to go buy something else that would hopefully be less of a headache!

    A refund was mentioned to the trader who was quick to say "that is not my policy" and attempting to claim we had caused the damage to the car (later backtracked). From what we've researched on the Sale of Goods Act, we are perfectly entitled to a refund and he was informed of this - he then said he did not have the money and it would be a couple of weeks before he would have.

    We then agreed to have his (the trader's) mechanic look at the car as he assured us he would put it right. Not 100% happy, I told him that as long as it was put right properly (and not a quick-fix) there would be no issue and asked if he would stand-over any repairs, by way of warranty should any issue re-occur. He said we would have his word.

    The car was left with him and he got back to us the following day saying that his mechanic has given the engine a full flush and put in a "special oil" (his exact words!) specially designed to cure piston ring issues, he says the misfire is completely gone but the exhaust is still slightly smokey. His mechanic assures him that this is normal until it begins to work on the engine and after a few miles should subside and if if not he'll have to strip the engine. He also said his mechanic cleaned the spark plugs.

    Would he not have been better getting his mechanic to strip the engine and repair it properly like he said he would do? I told him that I was not happy with this so called repair and asked for my money back, we left him a letter rejecting the car and asking for a refund.

    He said he would give us our refund when he had the money as he claims he does not have the funds at the minute and would need to sell a couple of cars first and offered no other solution to us. When asked how long it would take to get us our money back he was unable to tell us.

    This was last Saturday. As the car was with him while we rejected it, he still has it which leaves us in the position of having no car nor any refund. I suggested to him on Sunday that, rather than give us our full refund back, he give us our traded in car back as well as the money he was given which equates to the same as a refund (our trade in value was £1500 and we paid cash £1500 bring total paid to £3000). He flat out refused this stating that he had fully serviced our traded in car and done other minor repairs including painting the boot, which had a minor dent in it.

    He told us that we would get a refund once he sells the faulty mazda we rejected (he has actually re-advertised it for more than we bought it for!)

    My question now is, how much time do i give him to be able to get the funds to give us a refund before going through the small claims court? I find it difficult to trust him or believe anything he says now due to his 'special-oil' fix and the fact he's actually re-advertised advertised the car knowing it's faulty and has been rejected.
    Tags: None

  • #2
    Re: Used car advise.

    Hi and welcome.

    My attitude would be "refund now". No ifs, buts or later.
    Refer to trading standards and see if they already know this "dealer".

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Used car advise.

      Thanks for the reply.

      That's what we did do, after he was given opportunity to repair properly. Unfortunately, he says he doesn't have the money and I cannot extract it from him nor prove that he does indeed have it. He did say he would give us the refund as soon as he has it, but like I say I find him hard to trust now.

      Trading standards weren't interested and advised me only what I knew already - they didn't even ask his name and suggested I simply keep in contact with him and take it to small claims court if I had to.

      Would a solicitors LBA carry any weight rather than an LBA from myself? Does anyone know roughly how much would this cost?

      Is there anyway I can prove that he does have the means to give us our refund?

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Used car advise.

        There is something called an Oral Examination. It sounds like something that a dentist carries out and, in a way, it is, but is done at a court, not a dentist's surgery.
        Life is a journey on which we all travel, sometimes together, but never alone.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Used car advise.

          Originally posted by bluebottle;443648[B
          ]There is something called an Oral Examination[/B]. It sounds like something that a dentist carries out and, in a way, it is, but is done at a court, not a dentist's surgery.
          Actually, it sounds a bit risque, BB

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Used car advise.

            Originally posted by PaulMc81 View Post
            Thanks for the reply.

            That's what we did do, after he was given opportunity to repair properly. Unfortunately, he says he doesn't have the money and I cannot extract it from him nor prove that he does indeed have it. He did say he would give us the refund as soon as he has it, but like I say I find him hard to trust now.

            Trading standards weren't interested and advised me only what I knew already - they didn't even ask his name and suggested I simply keep in contact with him and take it to small claims court if I had to.

            Would a solicitors LBA carry any weight rather than an LBA from myself? It shouldn't, but sadly it might. Does anyone know roughly how much would this cost? The solicitor should tell you in advance when you instruct him - but it shouldn't be more than, say, half his hourly rate.

            Is there anyway I can prove that he does have the means to give us our refund? I don't think it makes much difference - he's only going to pay if you intimidate him into doing so, IMVHO
            Not much but HTH x

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Used car advise.

              Originally posted by MissFM View Post
              Actually, it sounds a bit risque, BB
              Risky more than risque, MissFM. The defendant and claimant appear before the court, usually, before the Chief Clerk of the county court. The defendant is required to bring with them to the OE details of all liquid assets, stocks, shares and other income. Withholding information is a Contempt of Court and also Perjury.

              If a defendant fails to appear at an OE, the OE is adjourned. The defendant is then sent a notice, giving the date of the adjourned hearing with a warning that if they do not appear at the adjourned hearing, they will be in Contempt of Court.

              Failure to appear at the adjourned hearing means the claimant may then apply to the court for a Committal Order. This is then passed to the court bailiffs who then go out and arrest the defendant and bring them before the court to purge their contempt. A Committal Order is a type of civil arrest warrant.
              Life is a journey on which we all travel, sometimes together, but never alone.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Used car advise.

                I may well be wrong, but I thought an oral examination could only take place if the OP had first got a CCJ against the garage in the small claims court.

                http://www.compactlaw.co.uk/free-leg...forcement.html

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Used car advise.

                  Originally posted by Wombats View Post
                  I may well be wrong, but I thought an oral examination could only take place if the OP had first got a CCJ against the garage in the small claims court.

                  http://www.compactlaw.co.uk/free-leg...forcement.html
                  No your not wrong of course

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Used car advise.

                    Originally posted by Wombats View Post
                    I may well be wrong, but I thought an oral examination could only take place if the OP had first got a CCJ against the garage in the small claims court.

                    http://www.compactlaw.co.uk/free-leg...forcement.html
                    That was the case some years ago, Wombats. I can't say whether it is the same now, however. Best thing to do is check with the county court. There must be some provision to check whether it is viable to issue proceedings against a potential defendant under Civil Procedures Rules
                    Life is a journey on which we all travel, sometimes together, but never alone.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Used car advise.

                      Originally posted by bluebottle View Post
                      That was the case some years ago, Wombats. I can't say whether it is the same now, however. Best thing to do is check with the county court. There must be some provision to check whether it is viable to issue proceedings against a potential defendant under Civil Procedures Rules
                      Found it! Form N316 in a County Court ( http://hmctsformfinder.justice.gov.u...s/n316-eng.pdf ).

                      I think the way to check whether it is viable to issue proceedings is called 'a solicitor!'

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Used car advise.

                        Originally posted by bluebottle View Post
                        That was the case some years ago, Wombats. I can't say whether it is the same now, however. Best thing to do is check with the county court. There must be some provision to check whether it is viable to issue proceedings against a potential defendant under Civil Procedures Rules
                        It would be a gross infringement of civil liberties BB if someone could force the disclosure of income and expenditure without first proving that they owe any debt, don't you think ?

                        :der:

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Used car advise.

                          If it is a debt collection agency as a claimant, then I would agree with you. However, the OP's case involves the Sale of Goods Act and the supply of goods by way of trade which have shown to be not fit for purpose. Nothwithstanding, the trader is claiming not to have the money, which is a common tactic used to avoid having to make a refund.
                          Life is a journey on which we all travel, sometimes together, but never alone.

                          Comment

                          View our Terms and Conditions

                          LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                          If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                          If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
                          Working...
                          X