Inocent until proven guilty

[Hay hay]

Not having a go sir, but do you think the licence should be granted or not?

[R0b]

That's not an answer I nor anyone else can give. Applications are granted on the basis of the licensing objectives under the 2003 Act taking into account both positive and negative representations from both parties as to why the licence should or should not be granted.

I suggest you do your own reading and the guidance issued by the government, particularly the chapters on personal licences, applications for premises licences, determining applications, and appeals. The link is below.

Revised Guidance issued under section 182 of the Licensing Act 2003 (publishing.service.gov.uk)

[MIKE770]

end of subject:-

[atticus]

Not quite. The OP should be prepared to respond to and deal with objections. He should consider the objectors' evidence and challenge it where he can.

[Hay hay]

Then dose obstructing a police constable count as a relivent offence then?

[Hay hay]

Then can anyone advice on my legal standing about having a purpose built weapon on private property
thanks

[des8]

Offences weapons Act 2019
sec 46 (2) (1A) Any person who possesses a weapon to which this section applies in private is guilty of an offence

And somewhere I'm pretty sure taping a knive onto a pole, turning it into a makesift pike, will make it a prohibited offensive weapon

[Hay hay]

So I guess I'm banged to rights then

[Hay hay]

The likely hood is they will try and pull something off at the hearing on Friday (since they have gone to such purgary allready)

Do you think they might arrest us for it then and keep me in the cells all weekend

[des8]

Sorry, but just don't know what likely outcome might be

[islandgirl]

I do hope you do not mean magistrates like me when you write "The problem hear Mike is that there is no judge! It's a panel of crooks made up of bent coppers and crypt people from the labor party" as I am none of the above! I rarely sit on these type of decisions but I think it entirely reasonable to await the outcome of the trial in this case. I am sure it would be the same if someone were applying for a taxi licence for example. And forget anything to do with Magna Carta and the Freeman on the Land rubbish - it simply does not work.

[MIKE770]

I do hope you do not mean magistrates like me when you write "The problem hear Mike is that there is no judge! It's a panel of crooks made up of bent coppers and crypt people from the labor party" as I am none of the above! I rarely sit on these type of decisions but I think it entirely reasonable to await the outcome of the trial in this case. I am sure it would be the same if someone were applying for a taxi licence for example. And forget anything to do with Magna Carta and the Freeman on the Land rubbish - it simply does not work.

I concur

[dslippy]

To grant the licence they have to judge your character. A big question mark hangs over that. They are right to do just what they have done. It is very unfortunate for you that this has fallen in the middle of a huge delay in criminal hearings.

They are not judging you innocent or guilty, and a court does not find you innocent.
Talk to your lawyer about whether the trial can be fast tracked.

[dslippy]

Then dose obstructing a police constable count as a relivent offence then?

Certainly. It is part of a licence holder's duties to enforce the law and to work well alongside others doing the same.

[Hay hay]

No quote vacilities hear so point for point
#41 no it is not a magistrates court at all. It is a pannel of who ever they wish to choose. That is why i have requested that it goes to a magistrates for a fairer hearing

ok so let forget sill old rubbish like magna carta presumptions of inocent and old twadal like 10 maximus of law no.2 all are equil in the law. The police are judge juary and executioner and hence I will loose the case tommorow