• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Something i have been trying to work out for a while

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Something i have been trying to work out for a while

    I have been trying to work this out for a while now. If you have a mobile phone contract which you could not pay, you would get a letter demanding payment. Now we know that in response to this it is no use sending a CCA request (i know i've done it) they just write back and tell you that "this is not covered by the Consumer Credit Act".

    So if this is the case how come that when the account defaults they then send a default notice under section 87 CCA, after having already saying that this account has no bearing on the CCA. Either the account is covered by the act or it isn't.? Then to top it all they would register this default with a Credit Reference Agency.

    This has happened to me in the past and is something i have never quite been able to understand. Don't know if anybody else has had the same..??
    Servo Fides

View our Terms and Conditions

LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
Working...
X