• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Bailiff tries to force entry whilst a mother carries her 9 week old daughter

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • teaboy2
    replied
    Re: Bailiff tries to force entry whilst a mother carries her 9 week old daughter

    Originally posted by ExBailiff31 View Post
    Scared Mother,

    The reason why the Bailiff wont accept a payment plan on a parking fine is because he can only claim his fees LAST meaning once the debit is paid in full but for debts such as council tax it's fees first which is why they will set up payments with people example you owe £155 fine plus £125 costs total £280 if you paid the £155 over 3 installments of £51.66 the fine would be paid and the warrant cleared making it very hard for the Bailiff to claim his fees which is why they won't do it or they will clamp your car (and charge you any where from £125 to £225 to remove it!
    My advice to you is to contact the council direct and pay it either over the phone or send them postal orders to the value of the fine and court costs only this will stop Bailiff action and further costs.
    Sorry exbailif but i don't follow you there.

    You say on council tax he can claim his fees first, yet on parking fines he claims his fees last. I fail to see how that is true unless their is legislation to such effect - its quite obvious that fees are in addition to the outstanding debt or fine, and are added on top of the debt or fine in both cases. So long as the charges and fees are not disapportionate from the debt then the charges/fees are also collectable by the baliff. Nothing in law that am aware of states a baliff can collect fees prior to council tax debt or that a baliff must collect the debt prior to fees for magistrate court fines. In fact in magistrate court fine cases the fees are agreed between the bailiff and the court. So unless you can provide legislation to back up what you said above then i would be inclined to see that as a poor excuse for them not allowing a repayment plan.

    So it would certainly be interesting to see such legislation or regulations that confirms what you posted.

    Am not doubting your knowledge by the way, just i find that somewhat hard to believe to be honest.
    Last edited by teaboy2; 19th September 2011, 12:59:PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • ExBailiff31
    replied
    Re: Bailiff tries to force entry whilst a mother carries her 9 week old daughter

    Scared Mother,

    The reason why the Bailiff wont accept a payment plan on a parking fine is because he can only claim his fees LAST meaning once the debit is paid in full but for debts such as council tax it's fees first which is why they will set up payments with people example you owe £155 fine plus £125 costs total £280 if you paid the £155 over 3 installments of £51.66 the fine would be paid and the warrant cleared making it very hard for the Bailiff to claim his fees which is why they won't do it or they will clamp your car (and charge you any where from £125 to £225 to remove it!
    My advice to you is to contact the council direct and pay it either over the phone or send them postal orders to the value of the fine and court costs only this will stop Bailiff action and further costs.

    Leave a comment:


  • Amy
    replied
    Re: Bailiff tries to force entry whilst a mother carries her 9 week old daughter

    Wendy is exactly right. If this was a fine for a driving offence then it will be a magistrates’ fine and the rights of entry are different.

    However, a peaceful entry for the first warrant does not give the bailiff automatic right of entry for the parking fine despite what he may tell you. The two are entirely separate, so don’t worry about this.

    Has the initial driving offence fine now been paid and are we now only dealing with the parking fine?

    The filing of an N245 is when you admit to a debt for which a judgment has previously been granted and would like to suspend the warrant of execution because you wish to make an offer to the court to pay via installments.

    It is not possible to file an N245 if you wish the warrant to be suspended and/or revoked due to the debt either having been previously paid or not being your debt in the first place. Instead, you would file an N244 for this and you would attend a hearing to decide the merits, or lack thereof, of the warrant.

    Since this is a parking fine this is superfluous not to mention irrelevant.

    You should indeed complain to the court where this bailiff is certificated. His behaviour is wholly unacceptable. You should also complain to the local authority where the parking fine was issued since they are liable for the bailiffs in their employ.

    As per my email, please see my general bailiff guide here (previously posted by Tuttsi) Bailiff Guide - Legal Beagles Consumer Forum and my parking fine guide here Parking Fine Guide - Legal Beagles Consumer Forum

    If you could answer the outstanding questions, either here or by email, then we can help further.

    Leave a comment:


  • WendyB
    replied
    Re: Bailiff tries to force entry whilst a mother carries her 9 week old daughter

    Can I clarify, when you say driving offence, has this fine been through magistrates court, as if so, this will make a difference to the powers of entry. I'm presuming it has as the N245 is a court form. Was it the bailiff who advised you to submit the N245 form?

    Leave a comment:


  • enaid
    replied
    Re: Bailiff tries to force entry whilst a mother carries her 9 week old daughter

    Hi scaredmum,
    Apologies for how the thread went, it has been sorted now as you can see.
    Sometimes people jump in when they don't actually know how to help the OP and so discussions and sometimes differences of opinions follow.
    Enaid x

    Leave a comment:


  • Scared Mother
    replied
    Re: Bailiff tries to force entry whilst a mother carries her 9 week old daughter

    Hi All

    Apologises for the delay in response - the warrant he was executing at the time was for the unpaid fine on a driving offence. The new warrant is for an unpaid parking ticket. I'd said to the Bailiff from Marston's that as soon as I spoke to my OH he would submit the N245. He is certified and I am also complaining to the court who licensed him.

    I did not pay the second warrant as it's not mine or to do with me.

    My OH had tried to arrange a payment plan with Marston's but they wouldn't accept it.

    I will get the sworn stateent regarding what is ine asap.

    Please don't argue amongst yourselves - Had enough dispute and conflict - and I appreciate all those who have responded.

    Thanks you

    Leave a comment:


  • ExBailiff31
    replied
    Re: Bailiff tries to force entry whilst a mother carries her 9 week old daughter

    Firstly may I say what vile behaviour came from what should be a professional Bailiff who should be Certificated through a court and therefore should be an ambassador to them.
    You don't state what type of debt this was for? and I wonder how many visits this Bailiff had made to the property before?, you should know this as each time he visits he should be leaving a letter stating what the debt is for, what company he is from, how much is owed and his contact details all of which give you the chance to contact him and make arrangements.
    The Bailiff is obliged to carry his Certificate at all times and any company I.D which he should produce upon request but if you don't ask then he probably won't.
    You also mention at the end he said there was another debt for £395 but if you paid £195 he would clear it now, it may seem like a lot to think about in the situation but can I just ask why you never paid this or made an arrangement there and then?, as he will now probably return at some point and add further fees to the account and are you aware if he levied your goods or not (he should have given you a form with a list of your goods written on it and a break down of the debt)
    It is often a response from people in your situation to call the police if only to remove said Bailiff from your property however it's important to remember that they have no right to do this as the Bailiff is acting under a warrant issued by a court, they can only intervine if the Bailiff breaks the law in some way and as distressing as your experience was he didn't do.
    You also state that your partner owns little to no property only his clothes, some books and a few C.D's, well if it were ever to come to the point of removal you would have to prove on paper who owns what in the property or it can be reasonably assumed that you jointly own it all for example you can prove who owns a car because you have log books and paper work but how would you go about proving who owns the T.v or Microwave or sofa or pictures etc this is a very difficult thing to prove my advice to you is DO NOT LET THE BAILIFF IN talk to him through a window he can post any paperwork through the door to you which you can read or you can make an arrangement, he will be reluctant to do this as he can't charge fees and so will try to scare you into opening the door by saying things like "i'm going to get a lock smith and drill the looks out" or he may even make a fake phone call to another Bailiff pretending to be a lock smith etc but unless he has had previous access to your property he CANNOT ENTER.
    Further to all of this I would advise making a written log of what happened and call the authority directly who actioned the Bailiff and complain very strongly about his discussting behaviour and offer to set up a payment plan direct with them (which they cannot refuse) but they may also tell you to speak to the Bailiff office.
    Once again I'm so sorry to hear that you have been subjected to bully boy tactics from this man if you can see his Bailiffs General Certificate next time make a note of the details and complain to the court from where it was issued (it will state this on the certificate) chances are this is his M.O and ther may be other complaints logged about him as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • teaboy2
    replied
    Re: Bailiff tries to force entry whilst a mother carries her 9 week old daughter

    Originally posted by Amy View Post
    Teaboy, read my guide that Tutts has kindly posted, for further information.
    Just did, and edited my earlier post to show.

    So basically assuming that the debts in question are loans or credit card debt, then a walk in possession order is what the balliff would have had in which he would have needed a peaceful entry prior to taking any property or goods. I woud hardly call his attempt of entry peaceful though.

    Scared Mother, can you confirm what the actual debt the baliff was collecting on where i.e. loan, credit card, council tax, parking fine etc

    Leave a comment:


  • Amy
    replied
    Re: Bailiff tries to force entry whilst a mother carries her 9 week old daughter

    Teaboy, read my guide that Tutts has kindly posted, for further information.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Re: Bailiff tries to force entry whilst a mother carries her 9 week old daughter

    Guide to Bailiffs http://www.legalbeagles.info/forums/...ead.php?t=1411

    Certificated Bailff register http://www.legalbeagles.info/forums/...ad.php?t=18331
    Last edited by TUTTSI; 18th September 2011, 13:41:PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • teaboy2
    replied
    Re: Bailiff tries to force entry whilst a mother carries her 9 week old daughter

    Originally posted by Amy View Post
    Not strictly true, it depends what the debt is for.
    So what your saying is they can force their way in without prior entry to the property - Which debts are they allowed to do this for? As i always thought they had to have prior entry to your property i.e. valution of goods etc, before they could force their way in through unlocked doors or windows, and assuming the OP's partners debts sound more like credit card and loan debts, i see no reason that would allow them to force entry without prior access. Though i could be wrong since i don't deal in baliff issues.

    Scratch that, it makes it clear in the guide of yours that Tuttsi provided the link too.

    Leave a comment:


  • Amy
    replied
    Re: Bailiff tries to force entry whilst a mother carries her 9 week old daughter

    Originally posted by teaboy2 View Post
    By the way you are quite right he can not force his way into your home since he had not been inside prior to that.
    Not strictly true, it depends what the debt is for.

    Leave a comment:


  • teaboy2
    replied
    Re: Bailiff tries to force entry whilst a mother carries her 9 week old daughter

    I am absolutely appalled at this mans actions, this guys should be sacked for this and no doubt will be by the time we have helped you resolve this issue. Now admittely dealing with baliffs are not my area, as my legal knowledge is pre-court and court cases on debts and employment matter, not on baliff issues.

    But can you tell us who this guy worked for and what the debt was for and what the other debt he said he had an outstanding warrant was for? That should give the guys that deal with baliff issues somewhere to start on.

    By the way you are quite right he can not force his way into your home since he had not been inside prior to that.

    Leave a comment:

View our Terms and Conditions

LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
Working...
X