Bujon - Employment Tribunal Help Please

[Amethyst]

Re: Hello All

Probably best not to mention them ( have removed name)

[Bujon]

Re: Hello All

And yes, I don't want to give too much away as any XYZ litigation members on here will no doubt put two and two together due to the unusual characteristics of the claim, which is very strong from my perspective by the way, so am keen to take them on at the tribunal. :-)

[Kati]

Re: Hello All

Hello All, new to the site. I'm looking at posting some info and getting some advice for my upcoming ET, where I will be self-representing and taking on who have been assigned to represent the respondent....hope there is some keen help out there

Link to your other thread for ease - http://www.legalbeagles.info/forums/...091#post566091

[Bujon]

Re: Assistance advice required on an unusal set of circumstances

I should perhaps add the my ex-employers are housed in the same premises as X's employers, but don't think that would make any difference, as the two companies are not part of the same group.

[Kati]

Re: Assistance advice required on an unusal set of circumstances

No worries ... I got a bit lost on the forum to start with to be honest (it takes a bit of time to get used to it) :tinysmile_twink_t2:


I'm sure you'll get lots of help and advice soon xx

[Bujon]

Re: Assistance advice required on an unusal set of circumstances

Brill! I did try that but had a 'hanging' issue, will be more patient next time lol

[Kati]

Re: Assistance advice required on an unusal set of circumstances

And how do I keep my paragraphs within the post??

If you click "go advanced" at the bottom of the text box there is an option to preview before posting

- - - Updated - - -
[MENTION=19071]teaboy2[/MENTION] [MENTION=67649]matt3942[/MENTION] [MENTION=48758]stevemLS[/MENTION] ... any ideas??

[Bujon]

Re: Assistance advice required on an unusal set of circumstances

And how do I keep my paragraphs within the post??

[Bujon]

Assistance advice required on an unusal set of circumstances

Hello, I'm hoping somebody out there has the knowledge to assist with this enquiry.

Having submitted an ET1 form and am awaiting the ET3 form in response, but in the meantime I am trying to put together my plan of attack, and I have one element which I really need clearing up and it involves the mechanics of my previous employers staffing design.

I was under supervision of person X (who I have highlighted as perpetrator of bullying and harassment in my claim for constructive dismissal), however person X as far as I am aware is not actually an employee of my ex-employer. X is the FD of another firm, whose owners happen to have a financial stake my ex-employer.

I have stated that because of this fact, that my ex-employers are not in a position to offer me a duty of care whilst investigating my allegations against X who is clearly above and beyond their control. Is this a sound argument?

despite asking for clarification of X's employment status, this has been denied. Can I insist on this information?

It surely highlights a conflict of interest at the very least, no?

Should X even have line management responsibilities of staff members from a firm to which X is not an employee?

Someone point me in the right direction, as I don't wish to waste too much time barking up a dead end.