Is there a forum policy on this?
I have just had to inform a poster that I do not advise by PM, and have added a signature to state this.
Advising by PM increases risk. I wonder if any of us are insured in respect of our contributions here. I am not.
My approach is that I am happy to discuss in public, for the benefit of all who read. Before joining this place, for about 15 years I had been doing this elsewhere, in a forum that has now closed.
Advising by PM
Collapse
Loading...
X
-
Originally posted by atticus View PostIs there a forum policy on this?
I appreciate Des's point about there being a value in users being able to provide information that they otherwise wouldn't or couldn't in public and with that we would simply ask the more experienced members to exercise caution.
In a way I'm the worst offender in that as I openly ask users who have issues with particular companies to email me personally but that's because we have an intel gathering relationship with the regulator which has been very effective.
- 1 thank
-
The forum policy was always to discourage PMs, partly because of the possible dangers to both parties but also because it restricts the advice given.
On the open forum it is not uncommon for contrary views to be given, for corrections to inaccurate/inappropriate comments to be made.
If conversations are limited to PMs, those corrections cannot be made.
However on the other hand, some posters are reluctant to post all their details on open forum, and PMs can be useful for them to tell their story, including personal back details.
That info can then be filtered by the member who can post responses on the open forum thread for reviewe by other members.
Leave a comment:
-
We useed to have a mantra - a poster here does not know who he is talking with - their qualifications, experience or insurance, and a replier can never know the detail he could pick up in a few minutes face to face and with the documents.
In other words, what is posted here can sometimes be very helpful, but really should not be relied upon.
- 1 thank
Leave a comment:
-
Same here Atticus. It may help to add to your status to say your replies are to help but cannot be relied upon legally? Best to always avoid PM.
Leave a comment:
-
It defeats the object of having a forum, so definitely not to be encouraged.
- 2 likes
Leave a comment:
View our Terms and Conditions
LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.
If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.
If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Court Claim ?
Guides and LettersSHORTCUTS
Pre-Action Letters
First Steps
Check dates
Income/Expenditure
Acknowledge Claim
CCA Request
CPR 31.14 Request
Subject Access Request Letter
Example Defence
Set Aside Application
Witness Statements
Directions Questionnaire
Statute Barred Letter
Voluntary Termination: Letter Templates
A guide to voluntary termination: Your rights
Loading...
Loading...
Leave a comment: