Hi everyone
We filed for probate only to find another family member had already filed a caveat in advance without knowing
The testator had an Accountancy company handling his financial and administrative affairs. The executor who is handling the probate is employed by them and met him on a fairly regular basis to look at his finances so I would assume she would not merely be classed as a “lay executor”.
From the exchanges to date, the caveator was only interested in obtaining a copy of the will and advised more than once that unless she was given a copy of the will she would not lift the caveat.
The executor has advised the caveator that GDPR ceases upon death, but client confidentiality extends beyond that and that she is bound by that confidentiality. We are aware that legally we are not obligated to share the will before probate is granted but some threads on here and say it’s advisable to share the will - what about in this case where it’s an instruction from the testator?
The testator had advised that the will was not to be distributed prior to the granting of probate and the executor has repeatedly advised the caveator that she is merely following his instructions. Would this be grounds for not sharing the will?
The executor has also advised the caveator that if her aim is to see the will that can be accomplished simply by removing the caveat.
The paper trail is briefly this
Caveat lodged 2 weeks before probate application - caveator at that point not aware;
a) whether or not a will existed
b) who had applied for the probate
c) who the executors were
1Letter from executor to caveator advising their position and what can be done to resolve the situation - at that point caveator would now be aware there was a will
2Response from caveator stating usual coercion and vulnerability
3Response from executor advising her position as accountant and asked who caveator thought had coerced him
4Response from caveator now stating their rights a family member
5Response from executor advising legally not obligated to share will and was under direct instruction from testator not to do so until probate granted
6Response from caveator asking for info about drafting of will including “am I named in the will” - thats cleary an inheritance act issue is it not?
7Response from executor advising she could not share details as confidentiality still applied as he was a client, and, due to the fact we had reached an impasse a warning was issued
We were asking for guidance on another matter from probate registry and they advised us caveat is now permanent - but we have not had a copy of the appearance served on us yet
Any suggestions on how to proceed both with issuing a copy of the will and to date a lack of a served appearance
Thanks in advance
We filed for probate only to find another family member had already filed a caveat in advance without knowing
The testator had an Accountancy company handling his financial and administrative affairs. The executor who is handling the probate is employed by them and met him on a fairly regular basis to look at his finances so I would assume she would not merely be classed as a “lay executor”.
From the exchanges to date, the caveator was only interested in obtaining a copy of the will and advised more than once that unless she was given a copy of the will she would not lift the caveat.
The executor has advised the caveator that GDPR ceases upon death, but client confidentiality extends beyond that and that she is bound by that confidentiality. We are aware that legally we are not obligated to share the will before probate is granted but some threads on here and say it’s advisable to share the will - what about in this case where it’s an instruction from the testator?
The testator had advised that the will was not to be distributed prior to the granting of probate and the executor has repeatedly advised the caveator that she is merely following his instructions. Would this be grounds for not sharing the will?
The executor has also advised the caveator that if her aim is to see the will that can be accomplished simply by removing the caveat.
The paper trail is briefly this
Caveat lodged 2 weeks before probate application - caveator at that point not aware;
a) whether or not a will existed
b) who had applied for the probate
c) who the executors were
1Letter from executor to caveator advising their position and what can be done to resolve the situation - at that point caveator would now be aware there was a will
2Response from caveator stating usual coercion and vulnerability
3Response from executor advising her position as accountant and asked who caveator thought had coerced him
4Response from caveator now stating their rights a family member
5Response from executor advising legally not obligated to share will and was under direct instruction from testator not to do so until probate granted
6Response from caveator asking for info about drafting of will including “am I named in the will” - thats cleary an inheritance act issue is it not?
7Response from executor advising she could not share details as confidentiality still applied as he was a client, and, due to the fact we had reached an impasse a warning was issued
We were asking for guidance on another matter from probate registry and they advised us caveat is now permanent - but we have not had a copy of the appearance served on us yet
Any suggestions on how to proceed both with issuing a copy of the will and to date a lack of a served appearance
Thanks in advance


Comment