I understand that as co-executor I am obliged to distribute the estate, and as co-beneficiary I'm supposed to ensure everyone (two of us in this case) gets as much as they can fairly claim for the estate. The issue is that the estate includes property, and my co-executor / beneficiary and I don't agree on the property price, they want full ownership, but are fixated on one price only for my 'share' of ownership, and we are in dispute over what to do.
As we argue over money and getting solicitors involved... it occurs to me, why do I even have to do this? Can I just refuse to execute or sell my ownership until I get a figure in the right ballpark? I don't actually need the estate money, nice as it would be, I have a decent job already. Same for my co-executor / beneficiary. Is there danger in this? Could I be removed as executor for refusing to sell my co-ownership and so not distributing the estate?
As we argue over money and getting solicitors involved... it occurs to me, why do I even have to do this? Can I just refuse to execute or sell my ownership until I get a figure in the right ballpark? I don't actually need the estate money, nice as it would be, I have a decent job already. Same for my co-executor / beneficiary. Is there danger in this? Could I be removed as executor for refusing to sell my co-ownership and so not distributing the estate?


Comment