I would agree with your solicitor as it is for the challengers to prove their case, so sit tight.
However, no matter how strong your case, it can be cheaper to enter into a compromise rather than contentious litigation.
Unfortunately some act in this manner (threatening litigation when their case is poor) hoping to frighten the other side into compromise so that they do receive some sort of legacy rather than nothing
However, no matter how strong your case, it can be cheaper to enter into a compromise rather than contentious litigation.
Unfortunately some act in this manner (threatening litigation when their case is poor) hoping to frighten the other side into compromise so that they do receive some sort of legacy rather than nothing
Comment