Received a letter in my letterbox in regards to what they say is an outstanding debt, allegedly. They want me to contact the energy company or are going to install a pay as you go meter.
If that is not possible, they will get a warrant.
There has been some contact with the energy company over the years as they have sent someone to read the meters once a few years back. They have contacted me by telephone but when I pointed out that the amount stretches past the statute of limitations and mentioned the back billing rule and heard a few cuss words and they hung up. That was also a few years ago. I have not made any payments to any energy company (the account has switched hands) for over a decade now as the dispute originated that the energy companies bungled the switchover of the account. After the ombudsman got involved they finally acknowledged this but did not implement their decision. They instead set much higher tariffs that weren't mutually agreed to and made erroneous calculations.
I would like to point out that there is someone in the property that uses medical equipment that requires electricity to be used overnight. The energy company have not been informed as of yet and they have never asked about it but it is mentioned in the letter from the recovery firm, stating I should contact the energy company. They have provided a generic email address.
My own thoughts are that the energy company has no grounds to recover anything that is over six years old and that no detailed invoices have been sent. I am aware of the back billing rule and feel that it does apply in this instance, but a judge could decide otherwise.
I am hesitant to contact the energy company to tell them about the individual with the medial condition as that might somehow be used in court that the alleged debt has been acknowledged and thus no grounds left to argue that. I do not acknowledge the debt.
After reading through other posts here I can ask the energy company to send a detailed breakdown of aforementioned alleged debt and would think that they would send it. At that point I could dispute it and mention the statute of limitations and then mention the back billing rule in further correspondence.
Any advice would be appreciated as to what my next actions should be at this point.
If that is not possible, they will get a warrant.
There has been some contact with the energy company over the years as they have sent someone to read the meters once a few years back. They have contacted me by telephone but when I pointed out that the amount stretches past the statute of limitations and mentioned the back billing rule and heard a few cuss words and they hung up. That was also a few years ago. I have not made any payments to any energy company (the account has switched hands) for over a decade now as the dispute originated that the energy companies bungled the switchover of the account. After the ombudsman got involved they finally acknowledged this but did not implement their decision. They instead set much higher tariffs that weren't mutually agreed to and made erroneous calculations.
I would like to point out that there is someone in the property that uses medical equipment that requires electricity to be used overnight. The energy company have not been informed as of yet and they have never asked about it but it is mentioned in the letter from the recovery firm, stating I should contact the energy company. They have provided a generic email address.
My own thoughts are that the energy company has no grounds to recover anything that is over six years old and that no detailed invoices have been sent. I am aware of the back billing rule and feel that it does apply in this instance, but a judge could decide otherwise.
I am hesitant to contact the energy company to tell them about the individual with the medial condition as that might somehow be used in court that the alleged debt has been acknowledged and thus no grounds left to argue that. I do not acknowledge the debt.
After reading through other posts here I can ask the energy company to send a detailed breakdown of aforementioned alleged debt and would think that they would send it. At that point I could dispute it and mention the statute of limitations and then mention the back billing rule in further correspondence.
Any advice would be appreciated as to what my next actions should be at this point.


Comment