• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Car rejection: Vehicle not of satisfactory quality. Court or Ombudsman as next step?

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Hi Des - Both. In the same claim. Should add the response I reference above was from the finance house. Nothing from the dealer. Request for judgement was submitted for each.

    Comment


    • #17
      Even if a judgement is entered, the defendant could apply for set aside.so you might as well agree (altho' I wonder what reason a professional outfit could give for missing a court deadline)


      In HANSON v CARLINO (https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2019/1940.html) an application for an extension of time, made after a default judgement had been requested,
      was refused. However there was history in that case, and it was decided the claimant would be prejudiced if the extension was allowed.

      Comment


      • #18
        Thanks Des. Appreciate the insights. I’ll share an update of how things evolve…

        Comment

        View our Terms and Conditions

        LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

        If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


        If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
        Working...
        X