• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum. Please register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
  • LegalBeagles® is a free forum, founded in May 2007, providing legal guidance and support to consumers and SME's across a range of legal areas.

    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Letter from Direct Collections Baliffs/Regent Parking

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Project101
    started a topic Letter from Direct Collections Baliffs/Regent Parking

    Letter from Direct Collections Baliffs/Regent Parking

    Hi guys,

    Hope all is well - just a bit of help required on this one.

    I have received a letter from Direct collections baliffs limited a few days ago and was really confused as to what it was for because it simply displayed no detail.

    I have since called them and asked them what it is regarding and they mentioned a 'PCN' which I could not recall

    They have now sent me an email with quite a few different letters from different collection agencies. The original 'PCN' seems to be from a company called Regent parking and it is from 2017.

    I have attached relevant letters, can someone point me in the right direction as to who I should be writing to as there seems to be a few parties involved in this process and also from which angle I respond.

    Any help is greatly appreciated.

    Thanks,
    Tags: None

  • charitynjw
    replied
    Direct Collections appear to be acting in the capacity of 3rd party debt collectors.
    If so, they have no legal standing or authority in your case, as they are not party to the alleged contract.

    Leave a comment:


  • ostell
    replied
    The original PCN failed to comply with the requirements of POFA on 2 counts that I can see on a quick scan. No period of parking and the warning of keeper liability is incorrect tly worded.

    The sign is also a prohibiting sign in that it is only offering parking to permit holder. There is no offer of a contract to park to non permit holders. No contract then there can be no breach. To claim a contract exists when it is expressly forbidden would be perverse.

    Leave a comment:


  • Project101
    replied
    Hey guys,

    any help on this?

    thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • Project101
    replied
    Also sign attached

    Leave a comment:


  • Project101
    replied
    Sorry forgot to attach!
    3 5 2

    Leave a comment:

View our Terms and Conditions

LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Court Claim ?

Guides and Letters



Search and Compare fixed fee legal services and find a solicitor near you.

Find a Law Firm


Loading...
Working...
X