• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

LOWELL PORTFOLIO I LTD vs musicmonkey

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • LOWELL PORTFOLIO I LTD vs musicmonkey

    Received a claim? Yes
    Issue Date: 7th September 2018
    Have you Acknowledged the Claim?: Yes - 19th September 2018 - I have been on holiday so only just seen it today, still within the timeframe though fortunately
    Total Amount Claimed: £317.33
    Claimant’s Name: Lowell Portfolio I Limited
    Solicitors Firm: Lowell Solicitors Limited
    Original Creditor: BT PLC
    Original Debt (eg. Credit card/Loan/Overdraft) : telephone account
    Particulars of Claim: Please type out in full excluding names/account numbers: 1) The defendant entered into an agreement with BT PLC under account reference XXXXX ('the agreement'). 2) The Defendant failed to maintain the required payments and the service was terminated. 3) The Agreement was later assigned to the Claimant on 27/03/2017 and notice given to the Defendant. 4) Despite repeated requests for payment, the sum of £224.38 remains due and outstanding. And the Claimant claims: a) The said sum of £224.38 b) Interest pursuant to s69 County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue, accruing at a daily rate of £0.049, but limited to one year, being £17.95. c) Costs

    Is the debt Statute Barred (have you had any contact with the creditor or claimant over the last 6 years?): Not sure when money was last paid on this, but the account was probably 2012/13 at a guess.
    List any letters you have sent (eg: CCA/ CPR ) - I'm posting a CPR 31.14 to solicitors + SAR to BT PLC - doing this tomorrow (20th sept)
    Any Other Information or Background Details:
    I believe this account is from when I was living with a friend, I was not listed on the tenancy so there is no record of me living there (long story to do with their mortgage/ her parents) I wanted the internet so I set up the BT account but then when I moved out I just left them to carry on paying things which then they obviously didn't. Sure this doesn't make a difference to the claim against me but thought I would write it for you helpful bunch!
    Tags: None

  • #2
    An update on the above.
    I acknowledged the claim and I calculated the date I have to submit my defence as 10th october?
    Today (28/9/18) i got a letter from Lowell Solicitors saying I had not responded to the claim and that if I do not contact them or dispute the claim by 5th oct then the will issue CCJ. is this just a scare letter?
    As well as acknowledging the claim I sent a CPR 31.14 to Lowell solicitors and also an SAR to BT. This was done 20/9/18

    Am I ok to just continue with submitting my defence on 10th Oct or should I be replying this letter? Any reassurance would be appreciated.
    thanks

    Comment


    • #3
      Hiya, sorry your original post was missed. It is likely a scare letter, you submitted your acknowledgement of service in time, two days before the deadline of 21st Sept ( though they wouldn't be able to have got a default judgment for another two days to allow service time).

      You are fine putting your defence in before the 10th but if you have it ready earlier - say the Monday - that'd be fine too... you don't have to wait for the last minute, just haven given them time to respond to the information requests.

      You don't really know what happened with the account after you left the property where the broadband service was provided so the SAR should be important.
      #staysafestayhome

      Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

      Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Amethyst View Post
        Hiya, sorry your original post was missed. It is likely a scare letter, you submitted your acknowledgement of service in time, two days before the deadline of 21st Sept ( though they wouldn't be able to have got a default judgment for another two days to allow service time).

        You are fine putting your defence in before the 10th but if you have it ready earlier - say the Monday - that'd be fine too... you don't have to wait for the last minute, just haven given them time to respond to the information requests.

        You don't really know what happened with the account after you left the property where the broadband service was provided so the SAR should be important.
        Hello and thank you for the reply - I am just about to put my defence together based on templates on here, I had the below from Bt and Lowell in reply to my SAR and CPR31.14 requests.
        BT - response to SAR request - usually takes 1 month but we are seeing unusually high requests and need extra time, it should be no more than 3 months
        Lowell - For avoidance of any doubt, we confirm that our client has at no time claimed to have entered into any contract directly with you, nor to have been a party to your contract with original creditor. We repeat that the benefit of that contract was lawfully assigned to our clieent pursuant to Section 136 of the Law of Property Act 1925, the required Notice of Assignment being sent to you. We have also requested a copy of this document from our client, which will be sent to you on receipt.
        As this is a former telecommunications matter it is not regulated by the consumer credit act 1974, the original creditor is therefore not required to retain a copy of the agreement. Subsequently, we are unable to request a copy of this document. A default notice is a techincal documen that is applied to a credit agreement should a customer fail to repay the account. As mobile phones have a service agreement and not a credit agreement, a default notice does not apply and is therefore not issued. We confirm however, that we have requested statements from the original creditor and when a response is received we shall contact you.
        Notification of you having filed to Acknowledgment of Service has been received and you are now required to respond to the outstanding County Court claim within the timescale specified by the court.


        (I think i may have asked for some extra things on my letter to them which is why they have taken the time to explain a default agreement etc.)

        I shall post my defence statement here later this evening. Thanks for reading.


        Comment


        • #5
          They seem to believe it's a mobile phone ....
          #staysafestayhome

          Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

          Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by musicmonkey View Post

            Hello and thank you for the reply - I am just about to put my defence together based on templates on here, I had the below from Bt and Lowell in reply to my SAR and CPR31.14 requests.
            BT - response to SAR request - usually takes 1 month but we are seeing unusually high requests and need extra time, it should be no more than 3 months
            Lowell - For avoidance of any doubt, we confirm that our client has at no time claimed to have entered into any contract directly with you, nor to have been a party to your contract with original creditor. We repeat that the benefit of that contract was lawfully assigned to our clieent pursuant to Section 136 of the Law of Property Act 1925, the required Notice of Assignment being sent to you. We have also requested a copy of this document from our client, which will be sent to you on receipt.
            As this is a former telecommunications matter it is not regulated by the consumer credit act 1974, the original creditor is therefore not required to retain a copy of the agreement. Subsequently, we are unable to request a copy of this document. A default notice is a techincal documen that is applied to a credit agreement should a customer fail to repay the account. As mobile phones have a service agreement and not a credit agreement, a default notice does not apply and is therefore not issued. We confirm however, that we have requested statements from the original creditor and when a response is received we shall contact you.
            Notification of you having filed to Acknowledgment of Service has been received and you are now required to respond to the outstanding County Court claim within the timescale specified by the court.


            (I think i may have asked for some extra things on my letter to them which is why they have taken the time to explain a default agreement etc.)

            I shall post my defence statement here later this evening. Thanks for reading.

            Hi again Amethyst I hope you can help? I have used the defence template and filled it in / crossed out what I dont think I require, any help would be really appreciated. It is for a telephone / broadband so I think credit act doesnt count? The bits in red are the bits I think should be removed but happy for any and all advice.


            1.I received the claim XXX from the Northampton County Court on 7th September 2018.

            2.Each and every allegation in the Claimants statement of case is denied unless specifically admitted in this Defence.

            3.This claim [is for/ appears to be for] a [Credit Card / Loan / Catalogue Account] agreement regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

            4.It is denied that the Defendant has previously entered into an agreement with BT PLC/Lowell Portfolio I Ltd for provision of credit.

            5.The Claimants statement of case fails to give adequate information to enable me to properly assess my position with regards the claim.

            6.The Claimant’s Particulars of Claim fail to state when the agreement was entered into.

            7.[The Defendant contends the alleged debt is statute barred by virtue of Section 5 of the Limitations Act 1980 in that no payment or acknowledgment has been made for over 6 years]

            8.The Claimants statement of case states that the account was assigned from BT PLC Ltd to Lowell Portfolio I Ltd on 27/03/2017. The Defendant does not recall receiving notice of this assignment.

            9.It is denied that [Original Creditor] served any Default notice on the Defendant pursuant to s87 Consumer Credit Act 1974. The Claimant is required to prove that a compliant Default Notice was served upon the Defendant. The Claimant is required to prove that the any Default notice relied upon complied with the requirements of s88(4A) Consumer Credit Act 1974 and that the notice was in the prescribed form as required by The Consumer Credit Enforcement Default and Termination Notice Regulations 1983.

            10.On the 20th September 2018 I sent a request for inspection of documents mentioned in the claimant’s statement of case under Civil Procedure Rule 31.14 to Lowell Solicitors Limited. I requested the Claimant provide copies of the Agreement and Notice of Assignment.

            11.Lowell Solicitors Limited has not sent any of these documents to me.

            12.On the [Date] I sent a formal request for a copy of the original agreement to [Claimant] pursuant to section [77 or 78] of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 along with the statutory £1 fee.

            13.The Claimant has failed to comply with [s77 (1) / s 78 (1)] Consumer Credit Act 1974 and by virtue of [s77 (4) / s 78 (6)] Consumer Credit Act 1974 cannot enforce the agreement.

            14. I have asked the Claimant if we may agree to extend the time period allowed for filing of my defence pending receipt of documents (as allowed under CPR 15.5), but they have declined. [The Parties agreed to an extension to the time period allowed for filing of my defence under CPR 15.5 to allow the Claimants additional time to produce the relevant documentation to evidence their claim, however they have failed to do so.]

            15.Under Civil Procedure Rule 16.5 (4) Where the claim includes a money claim, a defendant shall be taken to require that any allegation relating to the amount of money claimed be proved unless he expressly admits the allegation. Therefore, it is expected that the Claimant be required to prove the allegation that the money is owed as claimed.

            16.I request the court orders the Claimants to provide the necessary documentation in order for me to fully plead my case else the Claim should stand struck out.

            17.In the event that the relevant documents are received from the Claimants I will then be in a position to amend my defence, and would ask that the Claimants bear the costs of the amendment.

            18.It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief as claimed or at all.

            Statement of Truth

            The Defendant believes that the facts stated in this Defence are true

            Signed: NAME

            Dated: 9th October 2018

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by musicmonkey View Post

              Hello and thank you for the reply - I am just about to put my defence together based on templates on here, I had the below from Bt and Lowell in reply to my SAR and CPR31.14 requests.
              BT - response to SAR request - usually takes 1 month but we are seeing unusually high requests and need extra time, it should be no more than 3 months
              Lowell - For avoidance of any doubt, we confirm that our client has at no time claimed to have entered into any contract directly with you, nor to have been a party to your contract with original creditor. We repeat that the benefit of that contract was lawfully assigned to our clieent pursuant to Section 136 of the Law of Property Act 1925, the required Notice of Assignment being sent to you. We have also requested a copy of this document from our client, which will be sent to you on receipt.
              As this is a former telecommunications matter it is not regulated by the consumer credit act 1974, the original creditor is therefore not required to retain a copy of the agreement. Subsequently, we are unable to request a copy of this document. A default notice is a techincal documen that is applied to a credit agreement should a customer fail to repay the account. As mobile phones have a service agreement and not a credit agreement, a default notice does not apply and is therefore not issued. We confirm however, that we have requested statements from the original creditor and when a response is received we shall contact you.
              Notification of you having filed to Acknowledgment of Service has been received and you are now required to respond to the outstanding County Court claim within the timescale specified by the court.


              (I think i may have asked for some extra things on my letter to them which is why they have taken the time to explain a default agreement etc.)

              I shall post my defence statement here later this evening. Thanks for reading.

              I have definitely never had a mobile phone with BT, unless someone did it in my name. I think our posts crossed slightly, I just posted my defence.

              Comment


              • #8
                Amethyst i was wondering if you or any of the helpful folks are able to help with defence statement? I want to get it submitted today ideally. Thanks!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Sorry, indeed I'd missed that - I'll have a mooch through it now xxx
                  #staysafestayhome

                  Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

                  Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

                  Comment


                  • #10

                    1.The Defendant received the claim XXX from the Northampton County Court on 7th September 2018.

                    2.Each and every allegation in the Claimants statement of case is denied unless specifically admitted in this Defence.
                    The Claimants statement of case fails to give adequate information to enable the Defendant to properly assess his position with regards the claim.

                    3. The claim is said to be for an agreement with BT PLC. The Claimant does not state the type or nature of that agreement.

                    4. The Claimant's statement of case states that the Defendant failed to maintain the required payments, although does not state what the payments were, what the service alleged to have been provided was, nor give any date of entry into the agreement or details of the termination.

                    5. The Claimant states a sum of £224.38 is claimed however gives no detail how that sum has been calculated. The Claimant is required to evidence the amount claimed.

                    6.The Claimants statement of case states that the account was assigned from BT PLC Ltd to Lowell Portfolio I Ltd on 27/03/2017. The Defendant has not received any notice of assignment from BT PLC.

                    7. In order to try and find out more information regarding the Claim, on the 20th September 2018 the Defendant sent a request for inspection of documents mentioned in the Claimant’s statement of case under Civil Procedure Rule 31.14 to Lowell Solicitors Limited, requesting the Claimant provide copies of the Agreement & Terms, Default/Termination Notices and Notice of Assignment.

                    8. The Defendant has previously had a standard BT telephone line and internet service, however not since around 2011/12, and is unaware of any outstanding debts.

                    9. The Claimant responded on the xxx October 2018 where they indicated the claim was for a 'Mobile Phone' and as such documents could not be provided and that the Consumer Credit Act 1974 did not apply. They state they have requested statement copies from BT Plc.

                    10. It is denied that the Defendant has ever had a mobile phone with BT Plc (or any of its subsidiaries).

                    11. Under Civil Procedure Rule 16.5 (4) Where the claim includes a money claim, a defendant shall be taken to require that any allegation relating to the amount of money claimed be proved unless he expressly admits the allegation. Therefore, it is expected that the Claimant be required to prove the allegation that the money is owed as claimed.

                    12.IThe Defendant requests the court orders the Claimants to provide the necessary documentation in order for me to fully plead my case else the Claim should stand struck out.

                    13.In the event that the relevant documents are received from the Claimants I will then be in a position to amend my defence, and would ask that the Claimants bear the costs of the amendment.

                    14.It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief as claimed or at all.

                    Statement of Truth

                    The Defendant believes that the facts stated in this Defence are true

                    Signed: NAME

                    Dated: 9th October 2018
                    #staysafestayhome

                    Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

                    Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Amethyst View Post
                      1.The Defendant received the claim XXX from the Northampton County Court on 7th September 2018.

                      2.Each and every allegation in the Claimants statement of case is denied unless specifically admitted in this Defence.
                      The Claimants statement of case fails to give adequate information to enable the Defendant to properly assess his position with regards the claim.

                      3. The claim is said to be for an agreement with BT PLC. The Claimant does not state the type or nature of that agreement.

                      4. The Claimant's statement of case states that the Defendant failed to maintain the required payments, although does not state what the payments were, what the service alleged to have been provided was, nor give any date of entry into the agreement or details of the termination.

                      5. The Claimant states a sum of £224.38 is claimed however gives no detail how that sum has been calculated. The Claimant is required to evidence the amount claimed.

                      6.The Claimants statement of case states that the account was assigned from BT PLC Ltd to Lowell Portfolio I Ltd on 27/03/2017. The Defendant has not received any notice of assignment from BT PLC.

                      7. In order to try and find out more information regarding the Claim, on the 20th September 2018 the Defendant sent a request for inspection of documents mentioned in the Claimant’s statement of case under Civil Procedure Rule 31.14 to Lowell Solicitors Limited, requesting the Claimant provide copies of the Agreement & Terms, Default/Termination Notices and Notice of Assignment.

                      8. The Defendant has previously had a standard BT telephone line and internet service, however not since around 2011/12, and is unaware of any outstanding debts.

                      9. The Claimant responded on the xxx October 2018 where they indicated the claim was for a 'Mobile Phone' and as such documents could not be provided and that the Consumer Credit Act 1974 did not apply. They state they have requested statement copies from BT Plc.

                      10. It is denied that the Defendant has ever had a mobile phone with BT Plc (or any of its subsidiaries).

                      11. Under Civil Procedure Rule 16.5 (4) Where the claim includes a money claim, a defendant shall be taken to require that any allegation relating to the amount of money claimed be proved unless he expressly admits the allegation. Therefore, it is expected that the Claimant be required to prove the allegation that the money is owed as claimed.

                      12.IThe Defendant requests the court orders the Claimants to provide the necessary documentation in order for me to fully plead my case else the Claim should stand struck out.

                      13.In the event that the relevant documents are received from the Claimants I will then be in a position to amend my defence, and would ask that the Claimants bear the costs of the amendment.

                      14.It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief as claimed or at all.

                      Statement of Truth

                      The Defendant believes that the facts stated in this Defence are true

                      Signed: NAME

                      Dated: 9th October 2018
                      If I could kiss you I would Amethyst thank you so much, I am really really grateful - thanks for clarifying for me x

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Obvs I've just gone through what you've got on the thread, so check I haven't misunderstood anything - you're signing the statement of truth - basically the point being that Lowell haven't shown at all that anything is owed to BT or what it is for - and their pointless template they sent you just shows how little they know about what they are claiming - but expect you to poo your pants and pay them just because they say to. They might come up with everything and you'll then have to negotiate settlement out of court ( not worth getting a CCJ over ) but BT are pants and simply may not provide the details. And of course you'd left the property before any sums were actually owing. So we shall see ... as always try keep money aside over next couple months to settle if necessary xxx
                        #staysafestayhome

                        Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

                        Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Amethyst View Post
                          Obvs I've just gone through what you've got on the thread, so check I haven't misunderstood anything - you're signing the statement of truth - basically the point being that Lowell haven't shown at all that anything is owed to BT or what it is for - and their pointless template they sent you just shows how little they know about what they are claiming - but expect you to poo your pants and pay them just because they say to. They might come up with everything and you'll then have to negotiate settlement out of court ( not worth getting a CCJ over ) but BT are pants and simply may not provide the details. And of course you'd left the property before any sums were actually owing. So we shall see ... as always try keep money aside over next couple months to settle if necessary xxx
                          Yeah thats all correct. i have the money to pay but i do not know what its for, I genuinely have never had a BT mobile. The house that I lived in a few years back had BT internet which I may have set up, but I didnt think anything was owed. Plus there is no proof I ever lived at that residence due to the set up I had with a friend, both parties wanted to keep it unofficial. I will see what comes back, at the end if i have to pay I have to pay but they can bloody well show me what its for before I do.

                          Again, thank you so much for the help, you are a very kind person.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Great that's exactly what I thought.... they need to tell you what it is and show it isn't just randomly plucked out the clouds before they can expect you to pay a sausage.

                            Good luck .... just shout when you hear back from them or the court xxx
                            #staysafestayhome

                            Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

                            Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Hi Amethyst following on from submitting my defence, I got the acknowledgment from the court saying they had it all fine. I have then on 23rd Oct had a letter from Lowell Solicitors with a Directors Questionnaire saying I should fill this in for mediation / setllement. I still havent had any information about what the debt is and the breakdown etc. Do I have to do anything with this letter? I can scan in and show you a copy if it helps?
                              Any help is as always much appreciated.

                              Comment

                              View our Terms and Conditions

                              LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                              If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                              If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.

                              Announcement

                              Collapse

                              Support LegalBeagles


                              Donate with PayPal button

                              LegalBeagles is a free forum, founded in May 2007, providing legal guidance and support to consumers and SME's across a range of legal areas.

                              See more
                              See less

                              Court Claim ?

                              Guides and Letters
                              Loading...



                              Search and Compare fixed fee legal services and find a solicitor near you.

                              Find a Law Firm


                              Working...
                              X