• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

MKDP LLP v's ij28 - County Court Business Centre Claim

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: MKDP LLP v's ij28 - County Court Business Centre Claim

    Originally posted by nemesis45 View Post
    OK, you need to inform the court of the agreed extension in writing asap e-mail with a copy of the letter attached
    is ok, just ask for confirmation of receipt.

    nem
    My AOS was done online - can I do this bit online or will I need to compose an email separately?

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: MKDP LLP v's ij28 - County Court Business Centre Claim

      Originally posted by ij28 View Post
      My AOS was done online - can I do this bit online or will I need to compose an email separately?
      It would be best done separately mentioning the claim number and sent by signed for post can't guarantee that it
      will be acted upon immediately via MCOL.

      nem

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: MKDP LLP v's ij28 - County Court Business Centre Claim

        Many thanks for the swift responses.

        I have written to the solicitor again for confirmation of the extension of time - for avoidance of doubt
        I have emailed and sent mailed copies of the 1st solicitors letter to the court for the extension of time
        I am still awaiting a response form Hoist Portfolio for a copy of the credit agreement
        I am still awaiting copies of documents requested from the solicitor Agreement, Default Notice and Assignment

        So as I see it I have 2 weeks to receive everything and to submit the defence.

        Thank you all so much for all your help so far.

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: MKDP LLP v's ij28 - County Court Business Centre Claim

          Originally posted by ij28 View Post
          Many thanks for the swift responses.

          I have written to the solicitor again for confirmation of the extension of time - for avoidance of doubt
          I have emailed and sent mailed copies of the 1st solicitors letter to the court for the extension of time
          I am still awaiting a response form Hoist Portfolio for a copy of the credit agreement
          I am still awaiting copies of documents requested from the solicitor Agreement, Default Notice and Assignment

          So as I see it I have 2 weeks to receive everything and to submit the defence.

          Thank you all so much for all your help so far.

          Happy to help!!

          The non compliance with the CCA request renders the debt unenforceable until the agreement is found, so don't chase it.
          This will be part your defence.

          nem

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: MKDP LLP v's ij28 - County Court Business Centre Claim

            I have had no responses - should I start to create my defence now?

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: MKDP LLP v's ij28 - County Court Business Centre Claim

              Hi

              We have received the attached letter today. Will the courts accept this as it may be delayed weeks ?

              scan-forlegalbeagels.pdf

              The CCA request was posted on 12/2/2016 and nothing has been received back in relation to this.
              Last edited by ij28; 25th February 2016, 20:15:PM.

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: MKDP LLP v's ij28 - County Court Business Centre Claim

                [MENTION=6]Amethyst[/MENTION] [MENTION=55034]nemesis45[/MENTION]

                Can you advise please. I am wondering if I should try to create my defence but do I still need to submit it on the date I originally agreed to or do I wait for further responses from the claimants?

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: MKDP LLP v's ij28 - County Court Business Centre Claim

                  Originally posted by ij28 View Post
                  Hi

                  We have received the attached letter today. Will the courts accept this as it may be delayed weeks ?

                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]22707[/ATTACH]

                  The CCA request was posted on 12/2/2016 and nothing has been received back in relation to this.
                  You have a 14 day extension it seems you must inform the court in writing of the extension e-mail with a copy
                  of the letter attached is fine.

                  nem

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: MKDP LLP v's ij28 - County Court Business Centre Claim

                    Hi

                    Yes I have advised the courts and it has been added to the file. I will try to create a defence.

                    Regards

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: MKDP LLP v's ij28 - County Court Business Centre Claim

                      Hi - Can anyone help me please.

                      The only response I have had since they agreement for an extension of time was received is from

                      Robinson Way
                      Debt Collectors

                      They have returned the £1 postal order sent off to Hoist Portfolio

                      It states that the account is with Howard Cohen and they have sent the request to them and that a general extension of time has been agreed.

                      No documents that have been requested have been provided so do I submit my defence on this basis and get it over with?
                      [MENTION=6]Amethyst[/MENTION] [MENTION=55034]nemesis45[/MENTION]

                      Help appreciated as I feel I am going to make a mistake.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Re: MKDP LLP v's ij28 - County Court Business Centre Claim

                        Originally posted by ij28 View Post
                        Hi - Can anyone help me please.

                        The only response I have had since they agreement for an extension of time was received is from

                        Robinson Way
                        Debt Collectors

                        They have returned the £1 postal order sent off to Hoist Portfolio

                        It states that the account is with Howard Cohen and they have sent the request to them and that a general extension of time has been agreed.

                        No documents that have been requested have been provided so do I submit my defence on this basis and get it over with?
                        @Amethyst @nemesis45

                        Help appreciated as I feel I am going to make a mistake.
                        OK this stinks of playing silly buggers. I would expect Cohen to have to pass the CCA request to Hoist now.

                        No agreement no enforcement. When was the letter dated?

                        nem

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Re: MKDP LLP v's ij28 - County Court Business Centre Claim

                          Originally posted by nemesis45 View Post
                          OK this stinks of playing silly buggers. I would expect Cohen to have to pass the CCA request to Hoist now.

                          No agreement no enforcement. When was the letter dated?

                          nem
                          Their letter was dated 04/03/2016




                          my defense letter is as below


                          IN THE NORTHAMPTON COUNTY COURT CCBC
                          CASE NO. xxxxx

                          BETWEEN

                          HOIST PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS LTD
                          CLAIMANT
                          AND

                          xxxxx
                          DEFENDANT


                          1: I received the claim xxxxx from the Northampton County Court Business Centre on 9th February 2016.

                          2: Each and every allegation in the Claimants statement of case is denied unless specifically admitted in this Defence.

                          3: This claim appears to be for a Credit Card agreement regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

                          4: It is denied that the Defendant has entered into an agreement with the Claimant for provision of credit.

                          4: The Claimants statement of case fails to give adequate information to enable me to properly assess my position with regards the claim.

                          5. The particulars of claim fail to state when the agreement was entered into.

                          6. The Claimants statement of case states that the account was assigned from HSBC to MKDP LLP. The Defendant does not recall receiving notice of this assignment.

                          7. It is denied that HSBC/MKDP LLP served any Default notice on the Defendant pursuant to s87 Consumer Credit Act 1974. The Claimant is required to prove that a compliant Default Notice was served upon the Defendant.

                          8: On the 9/2/2016 I sent a request for inspection of documents mentioned in the claimants statement of case under Civil Procedure Rule 31.14 to HOWARD COHEN AND CO. I requested the Claimant provide copies of the Agreement, Default Notice and Notice of Assignment.

                          9. Howard Cohen and Co has not sent any of these documents to me.

                          10. On the 9/2/2016 I sent a formal request for a copy of the original agreement to Hoist Portfolio Holdings 2 Ltd pursuant to section 78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 along with the statutory £1 fee.

                          11. The Claimant has failed to comply with s 78 (1) Consumer Credit Act 1974 and by virtue of s 78 (6) Consumer Credit Act 1974 cannot enforce the agreement.

                          12: The Parties agreed to an extension to the time period allowed for filing of my defence under CPR 15.5 to allow the Claimants additional time to produce the relevant documentation to evidence their claim, however they have failed to do so.

                          13. Under Civil Procedure Rule 16.5 (4) Where the claim includes a money claim, a defendant shall be taken to require that any allegation relating to the amount of money claimed be proved unless he expressly admits the allegation. Therefore it is expected that the Claimant be required to prove the allegation that the money is owed as claimed.

                          14. I request the court orders the Claimants to provide the necessary documentation in order for me to fully plead my case else the Claim should stand struck out.

                          15. In the event that the relevant documents are received from the Claimants I will then be in a position to amend my defence, and would ask that the Claimants bear the costs of the amendment.

                          16. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief as claimed or at all.

                          Statement of Truth

                          The Defendant believes that the facts stated in this Defence are true.



                          Signed …………………………………………

                          Dated : 10th February 2016

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Re: MKDP LLP v's ij28 - County Court Business Centre Claim

                            [MENTION=55034]nemesis45[/MENTION] I am panicking I think I should have filed this yesterday

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Re: MKDP LLP v's ij28 - County Court Business Centre Claim

                              Ok Take out para 3. The claimant inherited the rights an obligations of the original agreement on buying the debt.

                              Para 7 remove MKDP it cannot send a default notice on an already defaulted debt.

                              It would be worth adding this latest nonsense with the CCA request under para 11 as 11 9(a)

                              One xxxx I received a reply to my CCA request which was sent to the claimant on xxxxx , however the reply came from Robinson Way Ltd an associate company of the claimant, Included with this reply was my £1 statutory fee for the request and it was stated my request had been forwarded to the claimants solicitors. I aver this action has been taken to frustrate my request for documents.

                              nem

                              - - - Updated - - -

                              Submit online asap should be safe.

                              nem

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Re: MKDP LLP v's ij28 - County Court Business Centre Claim

                                Originally posted by nemesis45 View Post
                                Ok Take out para 3. The claimant inherited the rights an obligations of the original agreement on buying the debt.

                                Para 7 remove MKDP it cannot send a default notice on an already defaulted debt.

                                It would be worth adding this latest nonsense with the CCA request under para 11 as 11 9(a)

                                One xxxx I received a reply to my CCA request which was sent to the claimant on xxxxx , however the reply came from Robinson Way Ltd an associate company of the claimant, Included with this reply was my £1 statutory fee for the request and it was stated my request had been forwarded to the claimants solicitors. I aver this action has been taken to frustrate my request for documents.

                                nem

                                - - - Updated - - -

                                Submit online asap should be safe.

                                nem
                                thank you so much I will amend and submit now .... still panicking :tinysmile_cry_t:

                                Comment

                                View our Terms and Conditions

                                LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                                If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                                If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
                                Working...
                                X