• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

N244

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • N244

    Hello all, long time reader, first time poster. I'm a claimant and I'm looking to compile an N244 to strike out a defence - any suggestions on how to compile this correctly - I know the points I need to raise but no idea on how to correctly write it?
    Tags: None

  • #2
    Hi LANGBANK

    Welcome to LB

    What you need to do is give your reasons / facts and the law as to why you seek a Strike Out of the Claim / case, there maybe evidence which might help your case and make reference to CPR Rule 3.4.

    https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/pr...t03/pd_part03a

    Although you've applied to Strike Out the case, doesn't mean it will.

    Comment


    • #3
      Thank you Echat,

      defendant's defence is a 'bare denial' there is no coherent statement of facts and no supporting evidence.

      Defendant waffles on about other parties and other events unrelated to the case so obstruction of just disposal of proceedings/abuse of court process.

      Defendant states claim is a vendetta however motive and intention to defendant is an irrelevant point

      Statement of truth at the end of the defence doesn't include the correct wording and as such contravenes CPR Part 22

      Multiple inaccuracies and false claims again with no evidence to support

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by langbank View Post
        Thank you Echat,

        defendant's defence is a 'bare denial' there is no coherent statement of facts and no supporting evidence.

        Defendant waffles on about other parties and other events unrelated to the case so obstruction of just disposal of proceedings/abuse of court process.

        Defendant states claim is a vendetta however motive and intention to defendant is an irrelevant point

        Statement of truth at the end of the defence doesn't include the correct wording and as such contravenes CPR Part 22

        Multiple inaccuracies and false claims again with no evidence to support
        In the N244 form, break down their 'defence as you have in post 3; explain why the 'defence' fails, refer to the relevant CPR 34 / 22 etc.

        Comment


        • #5
          Super, will do. Thank you for your help

          Comment

          View our Terms and Conditions

          LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

          If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


          If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.

          Announcement

          Collapse

          Support LegalBeagles


          Donate with PayPal button

          LegalBeagles is a free forum, founded in May 2007, providing legal guidance and support to consumers and SME's across a range of legal areas.

          See more
          See less

          Court Claim ?

          Guides and Letters
          Loading...



          Search and Compare fixed fee legal services and find a solicitor near you.

          Find a Law Firm


          Working...
          X