• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Lowell Portfolio v pecpec

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Lowell Portfolio v pecpec

    Received claim on 16/02/2017
    Issue date: 14/02/2017
    Approx amount: £290
    Claimant: LOWELL PORTFOLIO I LTD
    Solicitor: Cohen Cramer

    Particulars of Claim:

    "The claim is for the sum of £199 due by the Defendant under an agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 for a Provident Personal Credit Limited account with an account reference #########. The Defendant failed to maintain contractual payments required by the agreement and a Default Notice was served under s.87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 which has not been complied with. The debt was legally assigned to the claimant on 26/Jun/2015, notice of which has been given to the defendant. The claim includes statutory interest under S.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue of these proceedings in the sum of £15.92. The Claimant claims the sum of £214.92."

    I'm not certain that the claim is statute barred. Repayments were made in cash, and the last payment was a few months before the date of default, which is July 2011. Borderline.

    Acknowledged claim on MCOL - 16/02/2017

    Letters sent:
    1. CCA request to Claimant plus £1 uncrossed postal order (18/02/2017)
    2. CPR request to Claimant's Solicitors + copy of CCA plus £1 uncrossed postal order (18/02/2017)

    Letters received:
    27/02/2017 - Response from Solicitor
    "We have received your letter in which you make a request for documents and have notified our client Lowell Portfolio I Ltd of this request. Documents in support of our client's claim will be disclosed on or before disclosure as directed by the Court. In the meantime, please file your response to the Claim Form in accordance with the Court timetable. If you require further time to prepare your response, please let us know as we may be able to agree a short extension to the Court time table."
    Tags: None

  • #2
    Re: Lowell Portfolio v pecpec

    Could really do with some help at this stage.

    The Claimants Solicitor has now denied the CPR request twice, the MCOL defence due date is rapidly approaching and I'm unsure about the best way forward from here.

    Anybody?

    Comment

    View our Terms and Conditions

    LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

    If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


    If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.

    Announcement

    Collapse

    Support LegalBeagles


    Donate with PayPal button

    LegalBeagles is a free forum, founded in May 2007, providing legal guidance and support to consumers and SME's across a range of legal areas.

    See more
    See less

    Court Claim ?

    Guides and Letters
    Loading...



    Search and Compare fixed fee legal services and find a solicitor near you.

    Find a Law Firm


    Working...
    X