• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

court form from mortimer clarke

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Re: court form from mortimer clarke

    SAR Request been sent again with copy of PP to cap1 see if they agree to send me the details this time, also not sure when my defence has to be in by is it 28 days from date of court claim form?
    Also this is what i have come up with for my defence can somebody have a read see if anything i need to add or delete at the moment thanks

    In the Northampton County Court (CCBC)

    CaseNumber: ######

    BETWEEN
    ##########(Claimant)
    ############

    -AND-
    ##########(Defendant)


    Defence
    1: I received the claim ####### from the Northampton County Court on 3rd February 2017

    2: Each and every allegation in the Claimants statement of case is denied unless specifically admitted in this Defence.

    3: This claim is for a Credit Card agreement regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

    4: It is admitted that the Defendant has previously entered into an agreement with Capital one for provision of credit.

    4: The Claimants statement of case fails to give adequate information to enable me to properly assess my position with regards the claim.

    5. It is denied that Capital one served any Default notice on the Defendant pursuant to s87 Consumer Credit Act 1974. The Claimant is required to prove that a compliant Default Notice was served upon the Defendant.

    6: On the 3rd February 2017 I sent a request for inspection of documents mentioned in the claimants statement of case under Civil Procedure Rule 31.14 to Mortimer Clarke Solicitors I requested the Claimant provide copies of the Agreement, Formal demand, Default Notice and Notice of Assignment .

    7. Mortimer Clarke Solicitors has sent only Agreement, Formal Demand, Notice of Assignment

    8. Under Civil Procedure Rule 16.5 (4) Where the claim includes a money claim, a defendant shall be taken to require that any allegation relating to the amount of money claimed be proved unless he expressly admits the allegation. Therefore It is expected that the Claimant be required to prove the allegation that the money is owed as claimed.

    9. I request the court orders the Claimants to provide the necessary documentation in order for me to fully plead my case else the Claim should stand struck out.

    10. In the event that the relevant documents are received from the Claimants I will then be in a position to amend my defence, and would ask that the Claimants bear the costs of the amendment.

    11. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief as claimed or at all.

    Statement of Truth

    The Defendant believes that the facts stated in this Defence are true.



    Signed …………………………………………

    Dated .................................................. ....

    Comment


    • #47
      Re: court form from mortimer clarke

      Why have you not mentioned the CCA request?
      CAVEAT LECTOR

      This is only my opinion - "Opinions are made to be changed --or how is truth to be got at?" (Byron)

      You and I do not see things as they are. We see things as we are.
      Cohen, Herb


      There is danger when a man throws his tongue into high gear before he
      gets his brain a-going.
      Phelps, C. C.


      "They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance!"
      The last words of John Sedgwick

      Comment


      • #48
        Re: court form from mortimer clarke

        Originally posted by charitynjw View Post
        Why have you not mentioned the CCA request?
        Not sure what im meant to use out of this? help appreciated
        10. On the [Date] I sent a formal request for a copy of the original agreement to [Claimant] pursuant to section [77 or 78] of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 along with the statutory £1 fee.

        11. The Claimant has failed to comply with [s77 (1) / s 78 (1)] Consumer Credit Act 1974 and by virtue of [s77 (4) / s 78 (6)] Consumer Credit Act 1974 cannot enforce the agreement.

        Comment


        • #49
          Re: court form from mortimer clarke

          It's a credit card, so s78 applies.
          Scrub references to s77.
          CAVEAT LECTOR

          This is only my opinion - "Opinions are made to be changed --or how is truth to be got at?" (Byron)

          You and I do not see things as they are. We see things as we are.
          Cohen, Herb


          There is danger when a man throws his tongue into high gear before he
          gets his brain a-going.
          Phelps, C. C.


          "They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance!"
          The last words of John Sedgwick

          Comment


          • #50
            Re: court form from mortimer clarke

            Originally posted by charitynjw View Post
            It's a credit card, so s78 applies.
            Scrub references to s77.
            wll amend and post tomorrow also not sure when my defence has to be in by is it 28 days from date of court claim form?

            Comment


            • #51
              Re: court form from mortimer clarke

              Originally posted by baldy1967 View Post
              not sure when my defence has to be in by is it 28 days from date of court claim form?
              It's 33 days from the claim Issue Date (on the top right corner of the first page N1).

              Di
              Last edited by Diana M; 14th February 2017, 10:22:AM. Reason: typo

              Comment


              • #52
                Re: court form from mortimer clarke

                have amended defence does this seem ok have i missed anything out now
                In the Northampton County Court (CCBC)
                CaseNumber: ######

                BETWEEN
                ##########(Claimant)
                ############

                -AND-
                ##########(Defendant)


                Defence
                1: I received the claim ####### from the Northampton County Court on 3rd February 2017

                2: Each and every allegation in the Claimants statement of case is denied unless specifically admitted in this Defence.

                3: This claim is for a Credit Card agreement regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

                4: It is admitted that the Defendant has previously entered into an agreement with Capital one for provision of credit.

                4: The Claimants statement of case fails to give adequate information to enable me to properly assess my position with regards the claim.

                5. It is denied that Capital one served any Default notice on the Defendant pursuant to s87 Consumer Credit Act 1974. The Claimant is required to prove that a compliant Default Notice was served upon the Defendant.

                6: On the 3rd February 2017 I sent a request for inspection of documents mentioned in the claimants statement of case under Civil Procedure Rule 31.14 to Mortimer Clarke Solicitors I requested the Claimant provide copies of the Agreement, Formal demand, Default Notice and Notice of Assignment .

                7. Mortimer Clarke Solicitors has sent only Agreement, Formal Demand, Notice of Assignment

                8. Under Civil Procedure Rule 16.5 (4) Where the claim includes a money claim, a defendant shall be taken to require that any allegation relating to the amount of money claimed be proved unless he expressly admits the allegation. Therefore It is expected that the Claimant be required to prove the allegation that the money is owed as claimed.


                9. On the 3rd February 2017 I sent a formal request for a copy of the original agreement to cabot financial uk limited pursuant to section 78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 along with the statutory £1 fee.

                10. The Claimant has failed to comply with s 78 (1) Consumer Credit Act 1974 and by virtue of s 78 (6) Consumer Credit Act 1974 cannot enforce the agreement.

                11. I request the court orders the Claimants to provide the necessary documentation in order for me to fully plead my case else the Claim should stand struck out.

                12. In the event that the relevant documents are received from the Claimants I will then be in a position to amend my defence, and would ask that the Claimants bear the costs of the amendment.

                13. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief as claimed or at all.

                Statement of Truth

                The Defendant believes that the facts stated in this Defence are true.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Re: court form from mortimer clarke

                  Before you send anything off (you have plenty of time yet), have you explored the statute-barred angle?
                  A statement which has been provided (post #7) indicates payments made Feb 2011 (2 x £80?).
                  Did you?
                  CAVEAT LECTOR

                  This is only my opinion - "Opinions are made to be changed --or how is truth to be got at?" (Byron)

                  You and I do not see things as they are. We see things as we are.
                  Cohen, Herb


                  There is danger when a man throws his tongue into high gear before he
                  gets his brain a-going.
                  Phelps, C. C.


                  "They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance!"
                  The last words of John Sedgwick

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Re: court form from mortimer clarke

                    Originally posted by charitynjw View Post
                    Before you send anything off (you have plenty of time yet), have you explored the statute-barred angle?
                    A statement which has been provided (post #7) indicates payments made Feb 2011 (2 x £80?).
                    Did you?
                    Really dont know why there are 2 x £80 on same date but wouldnt be SB untill 17 feb and they have started the court claim before this date so wouldnt it be within time limit IE before the 6 years
                    just looked at statment again seems if most things are x2 on there
                    just been trough my bank statement and yes 17 feb 2011 was last payment but only x1

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Re: court form from mortimer clarke

                      then what is the £ 80.00 x 2 on there??? did you make the payments ?

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Re: court form from mortimer clarke

                        if you did not make the payments then you would insert i.e. regarding alledged payments 2 x £80.00 that they be put to strict proof to show how paid by whom and payment method etc?

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Re: court form from mortimer clarke

                          i made 1 payment of £80 on feb 17th 2011 just checked my bank statements, but defo not x2

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Re: court form from mortimer clarke

                            well 2 payment showing as paid by you then your advantage as they would credit payments twice.!

                            - - - Updated - - -

                            so SB if court papers issued stops the SB issue at the moment.

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Re: court form from mortimer clarke

                              Had this back from cabot today re CCA, Do i need to do anything? [MENTION=87380]Diana M[/MENTION]
                              Attached Files
                              Last edited by baldy1967; 15th February 2017, 13:39:PM.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Re: court form from mortimer clarke

                                got another letter from cabot today excatly same as above with another £1 postal order

                                Comment

                                View our Terms and Conditions

                                LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                                If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                                If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.

                                Announcement

                                Collapse

                                Support LegalBeagles


                                Donate with PayPal button

                                LegalBeagles is a free forum, founded in May 2007, providing legal guidance and support to consumers and SME's across a range of legal areas.

                                See more
                                See less

                                Court Claim ?

                                Guides and Letters
                                Loading...



                                Search and Compare fixed fee legal services and find a solicitor near you.

                                Find a Law Firm


                                Working...
                                X