Re: Claim form - Letter structure help *urgent*
Thank you very much!
Originally posted by emanresu
View Post
Ok, I don't see the EXCEL bit, what does that mean for me: Read the particulars on the claim form (N1) again - Sorry what's this?! :\ do you have a way of seeing all the evidence and defence? or only what I've put on here?
The representative is a paralegal - "to the supervision of my principal".: Can a paralegal who wrote the WS supervise another paralegal that is presenting the case. Ask the judge about that. I didn't make this clear. - extract as it is - "I am a paralegal in the employment of BW legal for the claimant... I have conduct of this action subject to the supervision of my principal and the matters to which i refer are within the scope of my instructions save where expressively stated to the contrary and are true to the best of my knowledge"
lost you on the privy to the workings of VCS.: If VCS wrote the Witness Statement the evidence is first hand. The person writing the WS is not employed and is writing on the instructions of someone within VCS so it is second hand. The person presenting at court tomorrow is presenting information that has been through two sets of hands so third hand. Just call it hearsay so the judge knows that it is not a direct quote of the claimant. Sure
photographic evidence of blatantly obvious wrong location: That is the killer. You have to point out that the paralegal was clearly not supervised and is spouting information that they could not have known as they do not work for VCS and the court should not rely on their evidence. - Can I take in an iPad with google maps to reference differences, there's almost 20 pages to print each if not to compare errors.
The representative is a paralegal - "to the supervision of my principal".: Can a paralegal who wrote the WS supervise another paralegal that is presenting the case. Ask the judge about that. I didn't make this clear. - extract as it is - "I am a paralegal in the employment of BW legal for the claimant... I have conduct of this action subject to the supervision of my principal and the matters to which i refer are within the scope of my instructions save where expressively stated to the contrary and are true to the best of my knowledge"
lost you on the privy to the workings of VCS.: If VCS wrote the Witness Statement the evidence is first hand. The person writing the WS is not employed and is writing on the instructions of someone within VCS so it is second hand. The person presenting at court tomorrow is presenting information that has been through two sets of hands so third hand. Just call it hearsay so the judge knows that it is not a direct quote of the claimant. Sure
photographic evidence of blatantly obvious wrong location: That is the killer. You have to point out that the paralegal was clearly not supervised and is spouting information that they could not have known as they do not work for VCS and the court should not rely on their evidence. - Can I take in an iPad with google maps to reference differences, there's almost 20 pages to print each if not to compare errors.
Comment