Hi All
As some will know, those of us who borrowed money from the Student Loans Company have had our debts transferred to a debt collection company called Erudio, a subsidiary of Arrow Global.
I took out student loans in the 1990s and have not paid them back because first, I spent many years after my degree gaining a master's degree and a doctorate, and therefore earned nothing, and then after a series of very poorly paid jobs in the British public sector (universities) I moved overseas and became a stay at home Dad. In the past it has been a simple case of deferral every year, on the grounds I do not meet the threshold for repayment. For now, I am comfortable with this arrangement.
However, things with Erudio have not started well. First, they didn't send me a deferral letter, only a demand for money. For this reason we couldn't defer in time. Second, when we did send a deferral letter it was ignored and we got another threat. We are sending one more signed deferral notice to them, and if that is ignored I will refer the matter to Zachary Lewy, the owner of the debt collection company Arrow Global, of which which Erudio is a subsidiary, as I say. I will also write to my MP, who is the Prime Minister.
The reason I am writing on here, however, is that I have been alarmed by the behaviour of Erudio, which I believe constitutes harassment and intimidation:
1. They are threatening to refer people who defer their loans to credit reference agencies. The sharing of financial data in this way is obviously unethical, but may be legal and within the T&C of the contracts, however, I feel their using this as an instrument of intimidation on specific customers constitutes harassment. I defer so I feel this is relevant to me, although they have not made this threat to me yet.
2. They are demanding I reinstate a direct debit. The issue I have is that I was forced to cancel the DD after the previous company started taking money unlawfully by claiming I had not deferred when I had. I cancelled this DD after telephone consultation with the previous company many years ago, and this therefore constitutes a verbal contract. I will not be reinstating any DD and will close down my UK accounts if necessary. I do not live in the UK, by the way.
3. They are threatening some people with termination of the automatic debt-cancelling clause after they reach a certain age. This outrage obviously speaks for itself.
So in addition to these (threatening reference to CRAs, demanding direct debits when they have no right under the T&Cs to access the accounts, the age cancellation) I thought it might be useful if we could start a coherent list of examples of intimidation, harassment, or any other unlawful acts, so we can build a strong case against them. It might be useful in the future. Also, are they behaving lawfully? I can hardly believe the law allows some of the things they are doing.
I add here that it seems to me that I never signed, and would never sign an agreement with a debt collection agency, so I am rightly angered this is who I have forced to deal with now.
Thanks all - I have made a similar post on Mumsnet as well, in the hope of reaching a wide range of people. Hope this is OK.
Finally, does anyone know if there are copies of the original contracts of the SLC from the late 1990s online? I can't find mine (moved house nine times since then) and I would like to review the original T&C.
Many thanks and kind regards to all
As some will know, those of us who borrowed money from the Student Loans Company have had our debts transferred to a debt collection company called Erudio, a subsidiary of Arrow Global.
I took out student loans in the 1990s and have not paid them back because first, I spent many years after my degree gaining a master's degree and a doctorate, and therefore earned nothing, and then after a series of very poorly paid jobs in the British public sector (universities) I moved overseas and became a stay at home Dad. In the past it has been a simple case of deferral every year, on the grounds I do not meet the threshold for repayment. For now, I am comfortable with this arrangement.
However, things with Erudio have not started well. First, they didn't send me a deferral letter, only a demand for money. For this reason we couldn't defer in time. Second, when we did send a deferral letter it was ignored and we got another threat. We are sending one more signed deferral notice to them, and if that is ignored I will refer the matter to Zachary Lewy, the owner of the debt collection company Arrow Global, of which which Erudio is a subsidiary, as I say. I will also write to my MP, who is the Prime Minister.
The reason I am writing on here, however, is that I have been alarmed by the behaviour of Erudio, which I believe constitutes harassment and intimidation:
1. They are threatening to refer people who defer their loans to credit reference agencies. The sharing of financial data in this way is obviously unethical, but may be legal and within the T&C of the contracts, however, I feel their using this as an instrument of intimidation on specific customers constitutes harassment. I defer so I feel this is relevant to me, although they have not made this threat to me yet.
2. They are demanding I reinstate a direct debit. The issue I have is that I was forced to cancel the DD after the previous company started taking money unlawfully by claiming I had not deferred when I had. I cancelled this DD after telephone consultation with the previous company many years ago, and this therefore constitutes a verbal contract. I will not be reinstating any DD and will close down my UK accounts if necessary. I do not live in the UK, by the way.
3. They are threatening some people with termination of the automatic debt-cancelling clause after they reach a certain age. This outrage obviously speaks for itself.
So in addition to these (threatening reference to CRAs, demanding direct debits when they have no right under the T&Cs to access the accounts, the age cancellation) I thought it might be useful if we could start a coherent list of examples of intimidation, harassment, or any other unlawful acts, so we can build a strong case against them. It might be useful in the future. Also, are they behaving lawfully? I can hardly believe the law allows some of the things they are doing.
I add here that it seems to me that I never signed, and would never sign an agreement with a debt collection agency, so I am rightly angered this is who I have forced to deal with now.
Thanks all - I have made a similar post on Mumsnet as well, in the hope of reaching a wide range of people. Hope this is OK.
Finally, does anyone know if there are copies of the original contracts of the SLC from the late 1990s online? I can't find mine (moved house nine times since then) and I would like to review the original T&C.
Many thanks and kind regards to all
Comment