• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Wintebourne -very harrowing - PLEASE sign

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Wintebourne -very harrowing - PLEASE sign

    http://www.change.org/en-GB/petition...share_petition

    Please will anyone who agrees with the above sign the petition?

    I warn you that the report makes harrowing - heartbreaking - reading
    Tags: None

  • #2
    Re: Wintebourne -very harrowing - PLEASE sign

    Signed

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Wintebourne -very harrowing - PLEASE sign

      Tweeted as well xx
      #staysafestayhome

      Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

      Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Wintebourne -very harrowing - PLEASE sign

        Thanks so much both - and thanks for tweeting it, too Ame. I think they "only" need 400 more sigs for it to make an impact...

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Wintebourne -very harrowing - PLEASE sign

          I think they will need a bit more than that, sadly.

          Anyway more reading if it's a subject people are interested in

          3 April 2014: Government launch 'Positive and Proactive Care'
          Following increasing concerns about the inappropriate use of restrictive interventions across health and care settings; including ‘Transforming Care: a national response to Winterbourne View Hospital’ (DH 2012), ‘Mental Health Crisis Care: physical restraint in crisis’ (Mind 2013), and a recent inspection of inpatient learning disability services by the Care Quality Commission the Department of Health today launched its new guidance about reducing restrictive interventions.
          The Royal College of Nursing led on reviewing, consulting and developing the new guidance. BILD was involved in the development of both pieces of work through the steering group for Skills for Care and the Expert Reference Group for the DH guidance.

          Download:



          ‘Lack of action’ on moving people out of Winterbourne-style institutions cannot continue, warns Lamb

          Minister's comments follow latest figures showing 7% of learning disabled hospital patients on course to meet government target to move by June

          By mithran samuel on March 20, 2014 in Adults, Disability, Mental Health, Social care leaders




          ‘The lack of action’ on moving people with learning disabilities or autism out of hospitals into community-based care cannot continue, care minister Norman Lamb has warned after NHS England figures exposed the lack of progress.
          Despite a government target to move all patients placed inappropriately in hospitals into community settings by 1 June 2014, as part of its response to Winterbourne View, just 7% were due to move before this date, according to NHS England.
          And though the figures date from 31 December 2013, the head of the programme charged with supporting commissioners to make the changes, Bill Mumford, said there was likely not to have been much change between then and now.
          Data submitted by 169 of the 211 clinical commissioning groups and the ten NHS England specialised commissioning teams identified 2,577 relevant patients with learning disabilities or autism and additional mental health problem, in hospitals as of 31 December 2013. Of these, 260 were due to transfer out of inpatient care, and 172 had a transfer date before 1 June.
          Of the others, 1932 did not have a transfer date and, for the remaining 385, an inexact response was provided by commissioners to NHS England about their transfer plans. The biggest reason for the lack of a transfer date – in 1108 cases – was a clinical decision.
          ‘Lack of action cannot continue’ – Lamb
          Lamb, who has made the programme a personal priority, said: ”I realise that for some people, doctors have decided that the best thing for them is to stay where they are and for some who are subject to Ministry of Justice restrictions [relating to criminal justice], it would be inappropriate to move. Making sure the right care is provided is a complex process.
          “However, assessment, care plans and transfer dates are key and it’s taking some commissioners too long to do them. This lack of action cannot continue.”
          “What we have is extremely disappointing,” said Mumford, director of the Department of Health-funded Winterbourne View Joint Improvement Programme (WVJIP), in a blog published yesterday. “In summary we are we faced with a significant failing in the discharge planning for June and, perhaps more importantly, the returns raise a major question as to whether we will make significant progress in reducing reliance on in-patient care beyond June.”
          NHS England has been asked to produce these figures on a quarterly basis to enable the WVJIP and the Department of Health to track progress against their objectives. Mumford, who said this month said some commissioners were ‘complacent’ about making progress on this issue, said he was “realistic” that there is unlikely to have been significant progress between December and March.
          The data also showed that:
          • More patients (247) were admitted to inpatient settings than transferred out of them (124) from October to December 2013;
          • Over a quarter of patients were not recorded as being on a register of people with learning disabilities or autism and mental health conditions in NHS-funded care, despite the NHS having had to have developed registers covering this population by April 2013;
          • More positively, 2315 of the patients (90%) had a care co-ordinator and 2408 (93%) had access to independent advocacy.

          Progress slowest in secure settings
          The lack of progress was greatest for placements commissioned by specialised NHS England commissioners, which tend to be in secure settings, rather than those purchased by local CCGs. Just 31 people of the 1407 patients whose placements were commissioned by NHS England had a transfer date. While some of this group are in medium and high secure settings and are prevented from leaving by a court order, most were in low secure settings.
          “This is despite a generally accepted understanding that there are likely to be high numbers of people currently in low secure settings who could safely be discharged to appropriate community settings,” said Mumford, whose programme is governed by NHS England and the Local Government Association.
          In response to the figures, Lamb said he had asked NHS England to develop “a clear plan to move things forward quickly, and to look closely at individual cases to make sure we make the best decision for everyone”. This was welcomed by Mumford.
          As part of this, NHS England said it would establish, for those without a transfer date, those who could move to community-based settings and those for whom the complexity of their needs meant they would need to stay in inpatient care.
          Moving to community-based care ‘can take several months’
          However, in a statement, it added: “Where it is agreed that a person should move into the community, it can take several months to find the right accommodation and ensure all the necessary arrangements are in place to support them.
          “For example, patients sometimes require a period of assimilation, with transition to the community phased over a period of months. In addition generic and specialist community based support needs to be in place to support individuals. Commissioners may not be able to set a transfer date until these issues have been resolved.”
          There are an estimated 3,200 relevant patients in England, and the difference between this and the 2,577 published by NHS England appears is accounted for by the lack of data from 42 CCGs in this week’s figures.
          #staysafestayhome

          Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

          Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Wintebourne -very harrowing - PLEASE sign

            Bless you, Ame.

            It's a subject so close to my heart I find it difficult (impossible) to be objective. But every sig will help and LB will make its mark, thanks to you xx

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Wintebourne -very harrowing - PLEASE sign

              signed

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Wintebourne -very harrowing - PLEASE sign

                signed x
                "Although scalar fields are Lorentz scalars, they may transform nontrivially under other symmetries, such as flavour or isospin. For example, the pion is invariant under the restricted Lorentz group, but is an isospin triplet (meaning it transforms like a three component vector under the SU(2) isospin symmetry). Furthermore, it picks up a negative phase under parity inversion, so it transforms nontrivially under the full Lorentz group; such particles are called pseudoscalar rather than scalar. Most mesons are pseudoscalar particles." (finally explained to a captivated Celestine by Professor Brian Cox on Wednesday 27th June 2012 )

                I am proud to have co-founded LegalBeagles in 2007

                If we have helped you we'd appreciate it if you can leave a review on our Trust Pilot page

                If you wish to book an appointment with me to discuss your credit agreement, please email kate@legalbeaglesgroup. com

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Wintebourne -very harrowing - PLEASE sign

                  Signed
                  Never give up, Never surrender.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Wintebourne -very harrowing - PLEASE sign

                    Signed, (but as it's a Welsh address it might be discounted)

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Wintebourne -very harrowing - PLEASE sign

                      Originally posted by des8 View Post
                      Signed, (but as it's a Welsh address it might be discounted)
                      Jolly well hope not Des - being in a not dissimilar siduation :tinysmile_aha_t:

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Wintebourne -very harrowing - PLEASE sign

                        Signed. Thanks for posting it MissFM :yo:

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Wintebourne -very harrowing - PLEASE sign

                          Signed.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Wintebourne -very harrowing - PLEASE sign

                            Signed

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Wintebourne -very harrowing - PLEASE sign

                              Over 4,000 signatures in 4 days!
                              Clare Lucas
                              Mencap and the Challenging Behaviour Foundation
                              Jun 06, 2014
                              6 Jun 2014 — We wanted to take a moment to thank each and every person who has signed and shared the petition so far. So far, over 4,000 of you have shown your support for the 3,250 people and their families who have been let down by the Government. We have not heard anything yet from the Prime Minister, so please keep signing and sharing to send a clear message; we will not stand by whilst the Government fails to meet the needs of people with a learning disability! Together, our voices cannot be ignored. Together, we can help bring about the change that was promised. Thank you.
                              #staysafestayhome

                              Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

                              Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

                              Comment

                              View our Terms and Conditions

                              LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                              If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                              If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
                              Working...
                              X