• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Atos again

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Atos again

    http://www.private-eye.co.uk/section...k=in_the_back&

    Tender is the blight
    Disability, Issue 1343
    TRICKY questions over the decision to award a new £184m disability assessment contract to the Eye’s favourite outsourcing giant, Atos, are to be raised in the Lords this week.
    The French service company has already been roundly condemned for the way it mishandled work capability assessments for disabled people (see another shocking example below). But now cross-party peers are concerned that Atos has failed to fulfil the promises made in its tender to run one of four regional contracts to assess the eligibility of hundreds of thousands more disabled people for the new personal independence payments (PIP) – a failure that will cause disabled clients extreme difficulties.
    Atos claimed in the tender that it had “contractually agreed” with 22 NHS and private health subcontractors to provide a network of 740 assessment centres across London and the south of England. But in reality there are only eight subcontractors and neither Atos nor the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is able to say how many of the promised 740 centres will actually materialise. Thus many disabled people with mobility and care needs will face longer journeys – up to 90 minutes by public transport – to reach their assessment appointments, rather than the maximum 60 minutes originally promised by Atos.
    Dropped out
    In the document, Atos claimed it had an “extensive” network of 16 NHS trusts, two private hospital chains and four physiotherapy providers ready to provide sites for assessments. But nearly a year after it was awarded the contract it has emerged that 12 of the trusts and both the private healthcare providers have dropped out, leaving Atos with just four NHS and four physiotherapy providers. Many of the NHS trusts named in the tender have also said that they did not, as Atos had claimed, “contractually agree to providing accommodation”.
    The disparity has come to light as the DWP begins to roll out assessments for PIP, which replaces the working-age disability living allowance, across the country.
    Atos insisted there were “absolutely no misrepresentations made to DWP throughout the year-long procurement process”. It said the government “fully appreciated” that formal agreements with subcontractors could not be in place at the time of the submission of the tender “but that trusts should be named in the tender in any event”.
    But peers will want to know why the government was in such a hurry to rush through its changes that it was prepared to accept incomplete tenders based only on “initial exploratory discussions” which, it seems, bear no relationship to reality.


    Stairs in their eyes
    NEWS reaches the Eye of yet another bungled medical assessment by Atos, which compounded the problems faced by one of its disabled clients. Gareth Brumby gave up his job as an assistant in a hospital operations department because of worsening ankylosing spondylitis, a painful and chronic arthritis affecting parts of the spine and connecting muscles and ligaments. He also suffers from osteoarthritis and recurrent Kohler’s disease, affecting the bones in the feet.
    Last year he was judged fit for work at an Atos centre in Halifax, despite reports from his doctor, and lost his employment support allowance. He said that when he read the Atos medical report it was “full of inaccuracies and mistakes”, some of which proved difficult to challenge because it was his word about what transpired at the assessment against that of the Atos practitioner.
    Depression
    But one element of Mr Brumby’s lengthy complaint that the DWP was forced to concede was the finding by the health worker that she had personally observed that Mr Brumby “did not appear to have any difficulty managing stairs”. There are no stairs at the Halifax office where he was assessed. The DWP dismissed this as an “error”.

    With no prospect of improvement in his health, and left with just £56 a week to survive on, Mr Brumby fell into depression.
    The appeal process was taking so long that Mr Brumby abandoned his appeal and started a new claim – and at his latest Atos examination, thanks to depression on top of his physical disabilities, he scored enough Atos points to qualify for employment support allowance!


    CAVEAT LECTOR

    This is only my opinion - "Opinions are made to be changed --or how is truth to be got at?" (Byron)

    You and I do not see things as they are. We see things as we are.
    Cohen, Herb


    There is danger when a man throws his tongue into high gear before he
    gets his brain a-going.
    Phelps, C. C.


    "They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance!"
    The last words of John Sedgwick
    Tags: None

  • #2
    Re: Atos again

    So, it is evident ATOS has mislead the government tendering body in order to secure a contract? On top of that, those they claimed they had secured premises from have pulled out, which isn't surprising when you consider who would want to be associated with an organisation that has been shown to be actively- involved in the falsification of medical reports and causing others loss, as well as exposing them to risks to their safety and health.

    The government must terminate ATOS's contracts immediately.

    If they don't, I can see the public clamour for them to do so getting louder and louder until the politicians find themselves being bombarded with some very awkward questions as to why they are reluctant to terminate ATOS's contracts. That should be interesting. Popcorn, anyone?
    Life is a journey on which we all travel, sometimes together, but never alone.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Atos again

      Shove over & let me sit down, mate.
      & pass the popcorn!

      It's past time that Atos should've had their tree shaken.
      I'd love to see what (or who) falls out!
      CAVEAT LECTOR

      This is only my opinion - "Opinions are made to be changed --or how is truth to be got at?" (Byron)

      You and I do not see things as they are. We see things as we are.
      Cohen, Herb


      There is danger when a man throws his tongue into high gear before he
      gets his brain a-going.
      Phelps, C. C.


      "They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance!"
      The last words of John Sedgwick

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Atos again

        A number of protests at Atos premises (during which disabled protestors were manhandled by the police), were never reported in the national press, or by the BBC.

        Odd that.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Atos again

          Now the Libel Reform Act is in force, ATOS cannot bully their critics into silence anymore. I do not feel the doctor who blew the whistle on their shenanigans with medical reports will be the last person to expose ATOS's questionable practices and it will only be a matter of time before the GMC, NMC and HCPC really bugger things up for them by making conducting any form of assessment for ATOS professional misconduct. No doctor, nurse, midwife or healthcare professional is going to risk their career for that. A GP in Plymouth, who used to conduct medicals for the DWP's forerunner, the DHSS, was struck-off the register for six months, required to work under supervision for two years after his strike-off period had expired and was banned from conducting any such assessments for life. His transgression? Falsifying reports so they were favourable to the DHSS who could then deny benefits to the appellant, even when the evidence available indicated to the contrary...... exactly what the good doctor exposed in the media a few weeks ago.
          Life is a journey on which we all travel, sometimes together, but never alone.

          Comment

          View our Terms and Conditions

          LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

          If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


          If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
          Working...
          X