• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Court bars claimant from seeking further recovery

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Court bars claimant from seeking further recovery

    ''A High Court judgment handed down yesterday confirms that a claimant who accepts a final decision from the Financial Ombudsman Service is bound by it and will not subsequently be able to bring a civil claim in relation to the same matter.''

    United Kingdom, Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration, Financial Ombudsman Award Bars Further Recovery in Civil Proceedings - CMS Cameron McKenna LLP - 08/11/2010, Arbitration & Dispute Resolution, Banking/ Finance

    FTAdviser.com - Court ruling on the Fos and civil claims
    Tags: None

  • #2
    Re: Court bars claimant from seeking further recovery

    Only if they accept the decision - I thought that was a given already tbh but good to have it definitive.
    The case is Andrews v SBJ Benefit Consultants [2010]
    3rd Nov 2010 ... TLC 319/10 Andrews v SBJ Benefit Consultants. COURT 59. Before MR J RANDALL QC (Sitting as a Deputy Judge of the Chancery Division)

    Cases refered to Bunney v Burns Anderson plc [2007] EWHC 1240 (Ch)
    http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2007/1240.html
    The Financial Services Ombudsman did not have the power to make a direction under s 229(2)(b) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 that would require a respondent to make a money award exceeding the statutory cap provided in the Ombudsman scheme rules.
    #staysafestayhome

    Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

    Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Court bars claimant from seeking further recovery

      Originally posted by Amethyst View Post
      Only if they accept the decision
      Indeed.

      It's being covered on Money Box today BBC News - Identity protection dispute

      Also looks like identity fraud insurance mis-selling is creeping in to replace PPI.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Court bars claimant from seeking further recovery

        Identity fraud insurance ? ffs how do people get conned in to buying these crap products. Absolutely unecessary.
        #staysafestayhome

        Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

        Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Court bars claimant from seeking further recovery

          Originally posted by Amethyst View Post
          Identity fraud insurance ? ffs how do people get conned in to buying these crap products. Absolutely unecessary.
          It's complete b******s.

          You are automatically protected from fraud by FSA requirements that banks have to reimburse any loss unless they can prove you are culpable.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Court bars claimant from seeking further recovery

            It seems that credit card providers such as Barclaycard, HSBC, Egg, RBS & Santander are farming out their card verification services to an outfit called CPP http://www.cppbusinesspartners.co.uk/

            So when you receive your credit card you are told to call a number to verify the card, but the number is in fact that of CPP - an identity & card insurance company who give the bank a commission on every policy sold thus allowing the banks to wash their hands of any subsequent mis-selling.

            It's the first item on the Money Box programme BBC iPlayer - Money Box: 13/11/2010
            Last edited by EXC; 13th November 2010, 15:56:PM.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Court bars claimant from seeking further recovery

              This makes the so-called regulators even more of an irrelevance

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Court bars claimant from seeking further recovery

                will the banks be able to wash there hands over any possible mis selling though if it was they that gave the number for verification ? Im not so sure they can
                ------------------------------- merged -------------------------------
                surely the banks and cpp would be jointly liable
                Last edited by pompeyfaith; 14th November 2010, 00:40:AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
                If you think nobody cares if you're alive, try missing a couple of payments.

                sigpic

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Court bars claimant from seeking further recovery

                  Originally posted by pompeyfaith View Post
                  will the banks be able to wash there hands over any possible mis selling though if it was they that gave the number for verification ? Im not so sure they can
                  Yes, a fiduciary duty of care owed by the cc companies to the consumer, as it is they who are introducing their customer to a thrd party agency?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Court bars claimant from seeking further recovery

                    Correct me if 'm wrong but I think you'll find that lenders only owe a fiduciary duty to their investors/savers & not to their borrowers
                    ------------------------------- merged -------------------------------
                    White & Case LLP - Publications - Does a Lender Owe a Duty of Care to a Borrower When Exercising Security Granted in Support of that Debt?
                    Last edited by righty; 14th November 2010, 01:56:AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Court bars claimant from seeking further recovery

                      Originally posted by righty View Post
                      Correct me if 'm wrong but I think you'll find that lenders only owe a fiduciary duty to their investors/savers & not to their borrowers
                      ------------------------------- merged -------------------------------
                      White & Case LLP - Publications - Does a Lender Owe a Duty of Care to a Borrower When Exercising Security Granted in Support of that Debt?

                      Hi. Well that was what the "?" was for at the end of my sentence. I'm sure you are right that they owe no fiduciary duty of care, but do they owe a "duty of care" (or something similar, outside of any regulatory rules) to their customers per se? It would be incredible to think that a high street bank could sell credit, gain commission on it, package that product up as theirs and not owe a duty of care to the consumer who bought it. That was what I was trying to ask, albeit not very well!
                      Last edited by The Debt Star; 14th November 2010, 10:56:AM.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Court bars claimant from seeking further recovery

                        The answer is in the judgment No duty is owed

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Court bars claimant from seeking further recovery

                          would the insurance regulator hold this data? Would be interesting to know if the FOS has recieved any complaints and if they are on the rise will check out there complaint reports later
                          If you think nobody cares if you're alive, try missing a couple of payments.

                          sigpic

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Court bars claimant from seeking further recovery

                            Originally posted by pompeyfaith View Post
                            would the insurance regulator hold this data? Would be interesting to know if the FOS has recieved any complaints and if they are on the rise will check out there complaint reports later
                            That would be FSA but I doubt they'd hold that data.

                            As for complaints to the FOS I'm not sure they would break down complaints on insurance to that degree but worth a check.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Court bars claimant from seeking further recovery

                              yup Exc it is probably under the heading of "General Insurance" which says a lot lol
                              If you think nobody cares if you're alive, try missing a couple of payments.

                              sigpic

                              Comment

                              View our Terms and Conditions

                              LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                              If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                              If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
                              Working...
                              X